There isn't any point in me arguing this. I know that there is a difference and I heard it with my own ears. Perhaps, when I'm not quite as busy as I am right now, I will recreate the experiment and convert the midi to audio in one speaker and record my real time playing to the other speaker, and then save it so that others who don't believe or aren't sure can hear what I am talking about. On the other hand, even with this kind of proof I suspect I'd get an argument anyway. If 192 works for you, I'm all for it Frank. It just doesn't work for me. As much as I like arrangers in general and programs like Jammer Pro for composing, my chief problem with them is the lack of sequencer resolution and the mechanical sounds that they produce. If the Tyros has the tools and resolution that can help me to overcome this mechanical quality I hear in the current crop of machines ( mine included ), it would be well worth a look for me.

The trick for me is to find a balance between parts I can play in real time ( longer but far less editing ) or have programs help me to compose parts ( drumes in particular ) that I cannot play well ( initially faster but sometimes with a lot of editing required to help get rid of the mechanical qualities )

When I do electronic based stuff, mechanical isn't a bad thing at all. When I move more toward jazz fusion oriented stuff, mechanical and quantised is totally unacceptable.

AJ


[This message has been edited by Bluezplayer (edited 10-11-2002).]