Hi AJ, Just noticed your posting 'after' I posted mine. Glad to see that we're in concurance on this ppq issue. 96 ppq is definitely NOT acceptable to my ears either. - Scott

Quote:
Originally posted by Uncle Dave:
In a players world, no one will notice the differance between a higher or a lower resolution.


I assume you're referring to LIVE arranger kb performance here, right? If so, I'll perhaps partly agree, because I realize the audience is typically (and should be) more focussed on your LIVE performance than the auto accompaniment styles.

Even so, auto accompaminent STYLES recorded LIVE (by a competent musician) at 1920 ppq sounds a lot more life like (capturing all the orignal timing nuances) than the same one recorded at 96 ppq. The audience may not consciously know the reason, but what they'll definitely notice is that the back up band (auto accomp) suddenly sounds a lot more 'emotionally' involving, and that's a really critical aspect to music performance to me.

Scott

[This message has been edited by Scottyee (edited 10-25-2003).]
_________________________