I suggest you reread a lot of the post that called for more content on the MS and less style editing. Rather than trying to rewrite history after the fact. I don't know why you now want to change your tone regarding development of the MS.

I am sure users can do a search for topics on the MS and see a constant theme for DOM to stop/slowdown (what ever term you want to use), the technology development on the MS.
But I guess all this discussion comes from members not understanding the concept of the MS.


Because when you do not recognize that �to add audio loop tools, multiple VSTi addressing form the styles and SMF's, and a plethora of other things,� is style editing and creation and not just OS development, and an ecentual selling point of the MS then I could somewhat understand the confusion and contradictions in most members postings hear on Synthzone regarding the MS and Audya.

You see, audio loop integration is and essential part of style editing and creation on the MS. VST integration is an essential part of style editing and creation on the MS.

Its all about understanding the concept.


And, if you think I am making these things up regarding understanding the concept of the MS, observe the following two statements in the same prier post by Diki:

�What there HAVE been (I should know, I posted them ) are threads asking for Dom to slow down the OS development, and concentrate on styles.�

And later down in that same post,

�But I assure you, wherever you have got the impression that anyone has asked Dom to slow down style editing tools, you are wrong....�


I never once said that user styles = suck. So I don�t know where you got that misconception from.

Oh and if you can not see that whether a style is useable for one but not useable for another is subjective, then��

I never compared user styles and factory styles in terms of �good� �better� �best�

So whether a style �suck� (what ever that means) is not the discussion I am having about user edited and created styles. To me, it is getting out of the arranger what works most comfortably for the user so that the user can satisfy their audience with the inclusions of styles.
You see, styles is just one part of the equation. What you do with them on stage is another important factor. What you are suggesting is that most persons on this forum have to have the styles doing every thing for them OOTB. That�s fine. It is just not how I work. To each his/her own.

I like to make it look and sound as if I am controlling the band not the band controlling me.


[This message has been edited by to the genesys (edited 06-06-2009).]