Originally posted by gilbert:
Bill,
It appears to me that your the one that is out of touch with the real world of arranger users.
Diki makes some very valid points regarding the needs of arranger players both Pro and Home player and and is not bashing the open keyboard but quite rightly identifies its shortcomings for arranger users. He has stated quite clearly what current arranger players would want from an open system before they would consider moving to an open system,that is, to be at least comparable with current top arrangers OTB.Which as yet is clearly not the case.
Diki point regarding nothing is really future proof speaks for itself and you don't have to look very far to see Why.
Bill I felt it was wholly wrong of you to ,Quote,> To say something is rubbish because YOU don’t like it, just gives the impression that only YOUR opinion counts<,
nowhere in his post did he mention anything was rubbish and it appears you have dismissed the whole context of his post in defence of the open sytem.I for one agree with this post,I am sure many more arranger players would also agree.
Gilbert.
[This message has been edited by gilbert (edited 09-25-2010).]
I think Bill’s comment to Diki that “To say something is rubbish because YOU don’t like it, just gives the impression that only YOUR opinion counts, and the rest of the world (Including those that have looked at the open concept) does not.”
Was referring to Diki’s thoughts that the open arranger’s OOTB do not meet the needs of the open arranger buyer who bought the open arranger.
Diki’s posts show a lack of understanding of the open arranger concept. It is not the content OOTB that matters to the buyer but what you can do to make the keyboard your own.
And, in all fairness, we have not seen any true arranger player here on SZ who bought an open arranger.
------------------
I have shortened my ID to TTG
Previous Topic
Index
