Anyone that has heard a pair of TOTL speakers from say forty years ago, Klipsch, B&O, JBL, Koss electrostatics, as long as they haven't been thrashed to death, you are still hearing exceptional speakers, even by today's standards. TBH, a LOT more attention was payed to flatness and color back then than does now except at the audiophile end of the spectrum (completely out of the OP's price range).

The only shortcoming from them might be a lack of extended low end range, as mastering standards only had to deal with LP's back then.

To the OP (Cleon), I might suggest if you feel your low end isn't quite up to task (and that would probably only be if you are doing a fair amount of dance music!) that a small powered subwoofer be added to your current rig to add a hair more depth.

And, kudos for taking the time to THINK about whether you really need to upgrade, rather than rushing out to buy the first thing our somewhat gear-crazy forum suggests. We have a habit here of recommending what WE use far too readily, rather than taking a careful look at the poster's TRUE needs, as if that will somehow validate our purchase more...

Guys! C'mon..!

Don't you even REMEMBER B&O stuff? It was on the front page of audiophile magazines all through the seventies. You EVER seen a picture of a Logitech system on the front page of one of those? Things might have changed, but they haven't changed THAT much!

Don't get me wrong... Logitech stuff is a good bang for the buck, and a cheaper alternative to the overpriced sub and satellite systems that the arranger manufacturers would LIKE us to buy (theirs!), but hi-fi it is NOT...