I must be a different animal....none of the things you guys consider to be the "lifeline" are that important to me

I want a keyboard that works well on stage, a keyboard that can edit on the fly...a keyboard with a selected group of say 20-30 styles that are of high quality(..Can't use hundreds or thousands)..but if I did need them I have thousands on board.

I don't need or want a bunch of registrations, or one touch settings..or pads..
I already have this and there is no need to look to the future, my gear will still be doing this 5-10 years from now....just as well s it does now..
I guess I am saying I am already content, but for different reasons than you guys..
Wow! Fran, that is a wonderful endorsement for the G-70.
I feel the same way about my Tyros4.
I wouldn't say you're a "different animal"...most of us want,
and have, the same features that you enjoy with your G-70.
Considering it's age, it is still a viable arranger, and I'm sure you'll get many more years out of it...it's built like a tank, and will stand up to lots of use.
Having registrations, Pads, and One Touch Settings isn't
necessary, I suppose, but I am very glad that Yamaha arrangers feature them because it makes performing go much more smoother (in my opinion), but I'm sure, if I had a G-70 and had to perform without them, I'd have no trouble getting by.
Kudos to you for sticking by "old faithful" and candidly sharing your reasons for doing so.
The other thing about using the G-70, is that
you know it so well...you are probably
the most knowledgeable person on SZ in regards to the G-70, and that familiarity and degree of expertness translate into the instrument giving you and your audience the best possible sound and performance.
Roland should hire you as a promoter for their new product (really, they should), the
BK-7m, which, on the whole, appears to have a tad
more detail in the styles than earlier Roland arrangers, but would easily be a product you could showcase to it's best advantage.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Fran.
Ian