Donny, I'm not picking on you, just presenting an alternative viewpoint. First and foremost, when was it EVER a good idea to restrict the number of choices....for ANYthing? As a trained volunteer in a program sponsored by the Unitarian Church, I used to teach a course in decision making to inmates in our local prison (the program was called THRESHOLDS). The idea was that the cause of most of their problems was poor decision making. One of the main premises of the program was that the more possibilities one had to choose from, the better the decision-making process. This didn't GUARANTEE a good outcome but it did improve the chances. I think that theory applies here as well. Besides, it kind of arrogant to think, 'because I only need a few, you should also only need a few', don't you think? Freedom of choice, baby, that's 'where it's at' .

chas