Generally, I agree with the ease of use,navigation,and functionality of the TOTL arrangers.There are some,however, that want to delay obsolescence with added software enhancements. One can say that the software was not up to par with the arrangers, and they are trying to catch up, but some of these features have been added to vA2 eg,that only the most expensive keyboards can match. This is at a cost of $400 instead of $4000. Some would think this difference is worth a little quirkiness. Dan is a prime example of providing countless enhancements for free.
The other is from a physical standpoint of being vastly lighter and a small footprint. So, I think both markets are viable.
Bernie
Dont get me wrong, i think v-arranger is a great product at its price €350 +€100/sound set. However, what does it add for me as a Genos owner?
And if you consider it as an arranger module, how does it compare to hardware arranger modules? And how cheap is it if you want to run it on a dedicated laptop/tablet?
Thats why i think that they need to offer unique features to be a viable choice over hardware,... and yes there are 2 unique features on the v-arranger, vst support and support for all arranger brand styles... so thats a first step..
Previous Topic
Index
