Originally Posted By Diki


Apparently, I won’t get much thanks for it, but make no mistake, you are all playing amazing machines (even if not using 10% of what they can do!) that are the result of people like myself that look to improving the breed.

You’re welcome! 😂🎹😎


WOW!!! your greatness is only exceeded by your humility smile smile smile. Diki, you've got me all wrong. I'm not opposed to any type of technological progress (okay, I'll pass on sex robots), I'm just saying that the 'average' arranger player (as I've come to know them over the years) is NOT going use his arranger to control a computer to produce his music, no matter how many assignable switches and buttons you put on it or how compatible you make it to Windows 13 Super Pro. Now if that fabulous sound that's embedded in that fabulous style can be accessed with one button push (thanks to YOUR relentless 'dogging' of the manufacturers), then yes, the average user will use it (even upgrade his 3-month old model to get it).

My point is, the "average arranger player' will use new technology BUT ONLY IF IT'S EASY TO USE. Arranger to 'average arranger-player brain to computer to audio interface to external sound system --- I don't think so. But just my opinion. I love discussions....where all opinions are valued.

chas
_________________________
"Faith means not wanting to know what is true." [Nietzsche]