Sorry Groovyband, but you need to be more accurate when trying to put a competitor’s product down. The Ketron is quite capable of changing tempo on the audio loop. Not perhaps as much as a MIDI only arranger, but AJ and Sokratis are correct in saying tempo is adjustable. Probably as much as is likely to be practical (most MIDI styles sound stupid at more than 25% up or down from nominal as well). And I would like to hear why the comparison to a decades old arranger at the MUDI end of things..?

In fairness, ALL hardware arrangers are stuck in pretty much the same 4 Variations, 4-6 fills, 3-4 Intros and endings paradigm, including Genos and PA4X (although PA5x’s ‘two styles at a time, when finally fixed, offers the prospect of double this). You want to not sound petty, acknowledge that the MIDI end of things is on a par with the latest arrangers, minus the guitar mode capabilities.

And while 4 effect seems a bit light, it was all a PA4X had until the new model. And more than a PSRS950. So, you want to make disparaging comparisons, there’s no need to use a decades old model. The new Ketron’s MIDI arranger is comparable to arrangers only a year or two old.

I would prefer if acknowledged vendors don’t spam each other’s threads, you certainly don’t want AJ coming over to your threads and pointing out the advantages their new arranger may have over your product. Let’s keep it civil.

Thank you.