In response to Grandpa Doug's query as to why anyone would use styles other than the ones on the keyboard, I have to add my views. Over the years, while recording with my keyboards, I would pick a musical theme and go from there. I've done around 30 tapes and CD's filled with all sorts of songs, and as with my Country Gospel songs, I needed 59 styles that could be adapted to gospel music, and there just weren't that many on the keyboard. The same thing with the Polka songs - using onboard styles, I wouldn't be able to fill one side of a 60 minute tape. I never use the same style twice when I record, for the same reason any recording artist won't use the same music for each song they put out. They wouldn't be in business for long. Now, I won't argue the merits of Technics onboard styles, because I feel they are probably top-of-the-line for quality, but there are also others that are very good, and quite usable for recording. Most of the songs I do, all by easy record, are for the most part, to help supply extra styles for those who can't quite get the hang of converting. It's a snap for me now, but a few years ago it was very confusing and I didn't know how to build up a style pattern on my own. This is where the learning curve comes in and when new players don't need help with conversions, then I will spend less time on that phase, and more time on practice and recording. When I play for myself, I quite often use the onboard styles, but mostly I would prefer more and better sounding instruments. There is nothing wrong with the Technics styles, but I like to be able to chose from a field of likely candidates when I decide to record. Also, this doesn't even scratch the surface of all the midi files that are out there on the net waiting to be used. I hope this helps to clarify things.

[This message has been edited by Bud Whipple (edited 04-11-2003).]