|
|
|
|
|
|
#101371 - 02/11/04 07:40 AM
Re: Who uses a stand-alone digital recorder
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/08/02
Posts: 15576
Loc: Forest Hill, MD USA
|
Boo,
If you want simplicity with multi-track recording software, just download a copy of Audicity's latest program and you'll be absolutely amazed. Just a couple buttons to select from, all the expression features anyone really needs, and it's free.
I would have thought this was a dead subject after Terry posted his computer recorded and external recorded identical songs for everyone to vote on. Obviously, some folks have very short memories.
The results were clearly in favor of the the software recorded by a heavy margin. Nothing complicated about this type of poll--it's what you hear--kinda' like music. If what you hear don't sound good to your ears, then you use something that does sound good--it just makes good, common sense.
There's nothing complex about recording songs using your computer. If this were the case, then I would be in a world of trouble. Try the Audicity program, and if you get in trouble, email me and I'll walk you through the problems over the phone.
Good Luck,
Gary
_________________________
PSR-S950, TC Helicon Harmony-M, Digitech VR, Samson Q7, Sennheiser E855, Custom Console, and lots of other silly stuff!
K+E=W (Knowledge Plus Experience = Wisdom.)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#101373 - 02/11/04 11:26 AM
Re: Who uses a stand-alone digital recorder
|
Member
Registered: 08/01/02
Posts: 2683
|
Mike, The Tascam really is not 10x's going the software route....did you forget the pc or laptop cost? I have less $ in my Tascam than I do in my laptop,interface and software. Yes you can edit wav. files to your hearts content with the h/d recorder, pretty much most of the more pro ones anyway. We do still disagree on ease of use with less glitches. I have both and have run both extensively. A h/d system is easier, faster and has the added advantage of a tactile control surface. With the midi, again I have all three the Tyros, Tascam and software. The Tascam is still the easiest to record to for midi and far more flexibility and 8x's as many tracks. I'm not saying at all that software is junk or not powerful, just the opposite. All I contend is for ease of use the h/d recorder is easier, faster and no interferring glitches from the other things that computers do. It is a stand alone dedicated unit that it's only job is to record music. Terry ------------------ jam on, Terry http://imjazzed.homestead.com/Index.html
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#101377 - 02/11/04 05:51 PM
Re: Who uses a stand-alone digital recorder
|
Senior Member
Registered: 10/08/00
Posts: 4715
Loc: West Virginia
|
Boo, Trust me the MRS-4 or MR8 would work great for what you want to do. Plus the price is fair on both recorders.
Squeak
_________________________
GEAR: Yamaha MOXF-6, Casio MZX-500, Roland Juno-Di, M-Audio Venom, Roland RS-70, Yamaha PSR S700, M-Audio Axiom Pro-61 (Midi Controller). SOFTWARE: Mixcraft-7, PowerTracks Pro Audio 2013, Beat Thang Virtual, Dimension Le.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|