SYNTH ZONE
Visit The Bar For Casual Discussion
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
#104551 - 12/15/04 01:08 AM HyperCanvas - WK 3500 comparison or maybe Softsynth vs Hardware
trident Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 08/22/04
Posts: 1457
Loc: Athens, Greece
A while ago, someone here posted the song "Brown Sugar", played on an Casio WK 3000/3500.

Since I have the midi file, which was made by Roland if I am correct, I downloaded HyperCanvas and used is to replay the song.

I was able to do a side by side comparison of sorts, playing it against the mp3 by Casio.

HyperCanvas seems to have "crisper" sounds (claims 26 MB samples linear equiv), although not that far better in quality compared to the Casio.

Casio seemed to have better, more "beefy" bass, but the leads used, were weaker. Also, Casio seemed to have a lot more reverb and also the line noise was noticeable.

I suspect the GM/GS midi, played straight through the Casio doesn't do it very much justice, since individual instrument levels are different and should be changer accordingly.

Anyway the HyperCanvas seems to have better sound overall.

I tried some other midis, also made by Roland, "Careless whisper" comes to mind... It was almost identical to the "real" version, until the sax line came in which was not enough.

Are there better GM softsynths around?

Top
#104552 - 12/15/04 05:47 PM Re: HyperCanvas - WK 3500 comparison or maybe Softsynth vs Hardware
rikkisbears Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/22/02
Posts: 6021
Loc: NSW,Australia
Hi Trident,
the only other gm software type synth that I've come across are soundfonts.
Most of the commercial midifiles I've collected over the years were created for roland gm/gs instruments.
I usually noticed they played back better on a roland sound source than they did on my korg/technic etc unless I tweaked them.

If you do find another GM soft synth, could you let me know too.

best wishes
Rikki

[QUOTE]Originally posted by trident:
[B]
_________________________
best wishes
Rikki 🧸

Korg PA5X 88 note
SX900
Band in a Box 2022

Top
#104553 - 12/15/04 09:58 PM Re: HyperCanvas - WK 3500 comparison or maybe Softsynth vs Hardware
Bluezplayer Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2195
Loc: Catskill Mountains, NY
I tend to go to "specialty" modules, sample sets, or soft synths for each particular group of sounds. For example I like Edirol's Super Quartet and Eve for piano sounds and acoustic guitars, Sonic Implants soundfonts and / or my Motif ES6 for Acoustic Drums and Electric guitars ( with amplitube as my virtual and real time electric guitar effects box ), RGC Pentagon, Pro 53, CSV80 and Moog Modular for analog synth sounds, VB1 for electric bass etc etc. The point being, other than the convenience factor, I don't care that much for using any one synth ( soft or hardware ) for all sounds. There just isn't any "all in one" solution that really seems to do it for me. I realize that what I do wouldn't work so well for someone who wants to play midifiles, unless of course you are willing to open the midifile in a vst host and then reassign specific parts to different modules ( A ton of work .. I know ).

There are a few decent GM softsynths out there, but I think some of the higher end soundfonts might sound better to me overall. Luxonix Ravity is pretty good, maybe overall better than Hyper Canvas. Plugsound makes a GM module, but I've never tried it. IK / Sonic Reality makes a higher end one as well ( Omni Synth ), but I haven't tried that one either, and I've seen mixed reviews from one end of the spectrum to the other.

You might want to research this more at KVR Audio. I'm sure there are some threads in their forums regarding GM synth modules,, and many modules are rated there and are available as demos to try out.


AJ


[This message has been edited by Bluezplayer (edited 12-15-2004).]
_________________________
AJ

Top
#104554 - 12/16/04 03:52 AM Re: HyperCanvas - WK 3500 comparison or maybe Softsynth vs Hardware
trident Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 08/22/04
Posts: 1457
Loc: Athens, Greece
Rikki,
AJ answered us both in one post, talk about efficiency. Thanks AJ.

I tried a demo version of Plugsound, they call it plugsound free, and it has a limited subset of the original sounds. They claim things like 6-8 MB for piano and copious amouns of memory for the other instruments as well, but I wasn't very pleased comparing to HyperCanvas. Going to try again though.

I am only playing at home AJ, so I am in no particular need for different sample sets to get the best of everything. A good GM GS, (wish that XG softsynth didn't have that lag), will probably suffice.

Going to search this KVR site soon
Thanks again, Theodore.

What about the subjective quality of soft synths? Are they generally better than the hardware ones?

Top
#104555 - 12/16/04 06:06 AM Re: HyperCanvas - WK 3500 comparison or maybe Softsynth vs Hardware
Frank L. Rosenthal Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 03/18/00
Posts: 1008
trident, it depends on which softsynths you plan on using. Softsynths like Kontakt, GigaStudio, Halion, etc. are many orders of magnitude superior to any hardware based (keyboards or modules) samplers on the market today. This also assumes you acquire very high quality virtual (sampled) accoustic instrumets (Bardstown Bosendorfer Piano, VSL Saxophones, Scarbee Base, etc. In addition, you also need to use very high quality effects (reverb, chorus, delay), for example, Pantheon Lexicon, Sonitus and others.

So if you get top of the line softsynth and assoiciated software you will greatly exceed any hardware based solutions. You can check this by listening to the various demos available on the internet, e.g., search Bardstown...., etc.

I hope this gives some useful information.

Top
#104556 - 12/16/04 03:58 PM Re: HyperCanvas - WK 3500 comparison or maybe Softsynth vs Hardware
rikkisbears Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/22/02
Posts: 6021
Loc: NSW,Australia
Hi Frank,
great to hear from you again.
Didn't want to get in too deep , just in case Trident asked me something I couldn't answer. It's been a while since I've had the time to even turn my computer on, so the brains getting a bit rusty again.

I tend think maybe a combination of the Hypercanvas and maybe some really good sound fonts for solo voices.
At least thats the way I hope to go in the long term.

The soft synths & xg piano will keep me busy for ages.

best wishes
Rikki

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Frank L. Rosenthal:
[B]
_________________________
best wishes
Rikki 🧸

Korg PA5X 88 note
SX900
Band in a Box 2022

Top
#104557 - 12/16/04 08:37 PM Re: HyperCanvas - WK 3500 comparison or maybe Softsynth vs Hardware
rikkisbears Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/22/02
Posts: 6021
Loc: NSW,Australia
Hi Trident,
meant to ask, did you mainly want it for midifiles?
I'm intending on using the Hypercanvas & some good quality soundfonts for my software based arranger setup( OMB ).

best wishes
Rikki



[This message has been edited by rikkisbears (edited 12-16-2004).]
_________________________
best wishes
Rikki 🧸

Korg PA5X 88 note
SX900
Band in a Box 2022

Top
#104558 - 12/17/04 03:46 AM Re: HyperCanvas - WK 3500 comparison or maybe Softsynth vs Hardware
trident Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 08/22/04
Posts: 1457
Loc: Athens, Greece
Hi Rikki,
I have a 10 yr old Casio CTK-750. GM set, some nice solo sounds (for the money and time I bought it, you can't use them along with styles though) and 128 Styles.

My playing ability hasn't exactly surpassed it, but there are new toys in town that I am drooling over, you can say that I am bored with it.

I am not a musician, I just play at home for myself, usually try to learn songs that I like, always using built-in styles, never going to gig. Maybe once or twice a year, I will play along 1-2 guitars in a gathering at a friend's house, so the things that Frank describes in his (Thanks Frank!!) are more suited to a professional, than me.

So, after reading around here in the forum, it seems like OMB and a decent softsynth (HyperCanvas sounds are miles ahead of my current Casio) may do the job as needed, excet the "portability" thing.

The "new portable toy" alternative would be a Casio WK 3500, or a PSR2100/3000 if I starve some months, money is a little tight

I suspect I would need to buy OMB & Forte & HyperCanvas, can you describe what else do I need If I go the software route??

Thanks for reading my life's story, hope you have the time to help.

Top
#104559 - 12/17/04 10:27 AM Re: HyperCanvas - WK 3500 comparison or maybe Softsynth vs Hardware
Bluezplayer Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2195
Loc: Catskill Mountains, NY
I agree with Frank about the sonic quality of high end sample sets vs hardware romplers / synths.

I can't argue against a PSR3000 Trident. I played one yesterday and it sounded pretty good to me. That said, I still probably will never own one. I still don't like the way the keys feel vs my Motif or PA80, but that's a personal choice and this topic has been the source of spirited debates here in the past. Not looking to do that again ( debate this ). It's just a personal preference.

I use the Yamaha syxg50 software xg module with OMB for starters. Most of the Yamaha styles play the "right" instruments in it. That said, to me, the sonic quality is fair. I wish Yamaha would release a better module for Windows XP/. I have the SYXG100, which I think is a step up in sound quality, but there is no support from Yamaha / Sondius for XP. Since I only haveXP, it's now useless to me.

Hyper Canvas sounds much better to me than the syxg50. I might tweak a little and add Super Quartet to the mix for pianos and guitars. Maybe the B4 for organs. Maybe a few nice samples in Kontakt as well. Etc..


OMB is portable for me since my primary music computer is a laptop. My laptop is by far the most powerful synth I've ever owned. There really is nowhere else for me to go with hardwre right now. The Motif ES, even with it's less than intuitive OS, still is easily my favorite choice vs any other rompler. Arrangers ? I like the Tyros a lot, and probably would like the PA1x`as well. I don't want to shell out that much cash for either. They are great arrangers, but at there pries too one dimensional for what I want and need. I love the Roland V synth too. Lots of cool and weird noises. I can do most of that with software though, at less than na tenth of the cost.

Sofware is my choice. I add and pay for what I want, and can leave out what I don't need.

The irony is, I had a nice discussion with the kb manager at my local store yesterday. He makes a living selling mostly hardware, but we were on the same page exactly with this.

AJ
_________________________
AJ

Top
#104560 - 12/18/04 11:55 PM Re: HyperCanvas - WK 3500 comparison or maybe Softsynth vs Hardware
rikkisbears Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/22/02
Posts: 6021
Loc: NSW,Australia
Hi Trident,
first up, you possibly could use your Casio with omb.( I assume it has midi & sends & receives ?, I think I read somewhere about it being able to use only 4 channels at a time??) Anyway it would just allow you to try it out & see how you like working with a software based arranger.

If in the end you ended up with a psr keyboard of some sort( psr 2000, 3000) , OMB wouldn't be a waste of money either, as you could always use it as a psr style editor.

If you ended up with the WK3500, OMB could be used with it also as a realtime arranger with the WK as your sound source. 2 arrangers for the price of software & an arranger.
Another option might be a DGX ( I've recently bought a dgx305 ( does it's midi thru usb & works with windows xp only, I think)
The dgx 300 had normal midi in/out.
DGX305 thru usb. Only loads 1 style at a time thru a smart media card, and only has 2 variations, 1 intro/ending. But midied up to OMB you get the 4 variations , 3 intro/ending that the normal psr styles have. Only has 32 note polyphony though, so there may be some compromises, but it is xg lite so psr styles don't need as much tweaking & editing as a gm sound source does.
I've used omb to edit & cut down a couple of my 9000pro styles.
Haven't had a great deal of time to spend on mine yet.

As for Hypercanvas, the psr styles will require some tweaking and some editing. Hypercanvas is GM2. Psrs use additional sounds & drums that are over & above the gm set.
There are demo's available for Forte http://www.brainspawn.com/products/forte/?op=download

Hypercanvas http://www.edirol.com/products/info/hyperCanvas.html


OMB http://www.1manband.nl/omb.htm

Midi Yoke ( Virtual midi cable) http://www.midiox.com/index.htm?http://www.midiox.com/myoke.htm

I also needed an asio driver for my laptop,
I managed to get this one to work.
http://michael.tippach.bei.t-online.de/asio4all/

Actually Frank & AJ helped me with all this soft synth stuff. ( they're the experts )It was a fair bit of trial and error on my part , but I eventually got it working.

If you actually have an SB Live soundcard in your computer, Synergi soundfonts may be another option for you. Again the psr styles will need tweaking.

best wishes
Rikki
[QUOTE]Originally posted by trident:
[B]Hi Rikki,
_________________________
best wishes
Rikki 🧸

Korg PA5X 88 note
SX900
Band in a Box 2022

Top
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >

Moderator:  Admin, Diki, Kerry 



Help keep Synth Zone Online