|
|
|
|
|
|
#108438 - 02/14/04 09:40 AM
Re: Does learning the piano make a better arranger player?
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/01/99
Posts: 10427
Loc: San Francisco Bay Area, CA, US...
|
Believe it or not, in addition to piano, I studied violin and performed in the school orchestra (4th thru 7th grade). Like Nigel, I think that every instrument has its own challenges. The primary difference between a string instrument (like the violin) & the piano (percussion) is that with a string instrument (like singing) you have to train your ear (listen) to reproduce the correct pitch, whereas when playing the piano, the pitch is fixed. This affords the beginning piano student to easily learn a simple song (in tune) whereas the violin requires technique & ear training to play that same tune. On the other hand, the piano requires the understanding of orchestration, chord mastery to balance inner voicings, and often multiple melodic/counter melodies, often emulating different orchestral instruments. On the other hand, violin is primarily a single melodic line (not chordal) instrument. The keyboard (piano/organ) was the sole 19th century instrument used to emulate the 'entire orchestra'. Many orchestral composers did their composing on the piano. Before the age of 20th century recording, the piano was the only way to hear what orchestrated music sounded in your home. All the classical compositions of the time were routinely transcribed for piano. The goal of classical composers/performers was to write/perform piano muisc to re-create the instruments of the orchestra. Piano Masters like Vladimir Horowitz were able to give the impression you are listening to an entire orchestra on the piano alone. Ok, for those of you who've already fallen asleep, you can wake up now. Class is OVER! - Scott
_________________________
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|