|
|
|
|
|
|
#111010 - 02/26/00 07:08 AM
Re: Got Jammer Live Today!
|
Member
Registered: 02/17/00
Posts: 532
|
Dear Michael
The shortage of styles is a "short-term" problem. The styles that are available are more flexible than hardware styles. For example, they support probabilistic selection of riffs, so they are less monotonous.
In addition, Jammer Live makes it easy to mix parts of different styles. Yamaha lets you make a new style that mixes parts from different styles. But Jammer makes this much easier--it qualifies as a performance feature, not just a programming feature.
Conversion of styles, while not automated, is straightforward. The Jammer Live sytle format is a superset of Yamaha's. A Yamaha style basically includes instruments and parts. The instruments corresponding to JL's musician styles, and what the instruments play during a Yamaha part are JLs riffs. In the absence of a CASM converter, there will be tweaking necessary to get the style to function correctly. However, I would guess that all the CASM capabilities are provided in plain English by JL.
Further, Band In the Box styles should convert pretty well to JL. This would give a source of probabilistic styles.
I think the software autoaccompaniment future is bright.
Clif
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111017 - 02/28/00 12:32 AM
Re: Got Jammer Live Today!
|
Member
Registered: 02/19/00
Posts: 95
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111021 - 02/28/00 06:45 PM
Re: Got Jammer Live Today!
|
Member
Registered: 12/16/99
Posts: 140
Loc: Brooklyn NY
|
Hi Frank, I just don't get the problem. (Am I missing something?) Why do you have to send the right hand voice(es) through Jammerlive? Set up the controller so that it sends left hand (below the split point) to, lets say, midi channel 1 and right hand to channel 2. Now have Gigasampler use any voice you want for channel 2 (or you can use a second or third voice on channel 3 & 4 respectivally). Now have Jammerlive recieve from channel 1, and I don't know over which channels Jammerlive sends it's accompaniment (midi) signals (I suppose you can program them), but have Gigasampler use the voices you want for those channels (which is the accompaniment) lets say channels 8,9,10,11,12,13,14 and 15 (8 channels for your 8 part accomp.) Can't even a simple midi controller split the channels. I suppose that you can pick what should be sent over which channel from whatever program or controller. Thank you.
------------------ Jick
_________________________
Jick
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111029 - 02/29/00 04:41 PM
Re: Got Jammer Live Today!
|
Member
Registered: 02/17/00
Posts: 532
|
Below I quote what Nemesys says about laptops in their FAQ. Despite the negative answer, I would not be discouraged from trying a laptop, at least with an external harddisk. There must be at least one PMCIA soundard by now, and some laptops have built in sound. There is a PMCIA UW SCSI available. Also, there are firewire interfaces and disks available. So what if 500MHz laptops are slower than their like rated desktops. As long as they are fast enough. Also, I bet many laptops allow power management to be turned off, at least when the laptop is coupled to AC. On the other hand, the lunchbox computers recommended by Nemisis at www.bsicomputer.com may be an attractive option is an external harddisk is not desired. There is another laptop option to consider: while it may seem to defeat the main feature of gigasampler, one could load samples into RAM. For example, the 150 MB GM library would fit into a high-end laptop's RAM. Clif "Q: Do you recommend a laptop for portable use? A: Notebook\laptop computers are generally not recommended for running the GigaSampler. They tend to perform slower than their desktop counterparts of the same advertised speed. The miniaturization plays a part in slowing things down. Due to lack of readily available PCMCIA soundcards, the audio output on laptop computers doesn’t compare either. The power management will also cause major problems. There are two recommended options for portability. Portable computers and Rackmount systems."
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|