I think I can chime in on this subject because in the past I have owned an SD1 and presently own a Tyros 2 and just ten days ago have added to it a Midjay. I bought it because I still have a lot of Ketron styles and they are really useful for some genres of music, like Country, Soul or Rhytm and Blues.
Since the first day I have owned it, I have found with the Midjay the same sensations I had in the past with the SD1 - positive and "not so positive". The positive ones are the impact of the styles and of the drums: especially the sampled grooves really add realism to a song. Speaking of the "less positive" ones, in the first place -like Manuel said- many sounds are dated while others, like the electric pianos, are simply not on the same level with other arrangers, not only the Tyros but also the Roland G 70 or the Korg PA 1X.
I agree that the sound quality is very subjective, but there are other things that are not so subjective, like the ease of use, the friendliness of the user interface, a well thought-out operative system, etc.
Here again, I think that Ketron in general leaves something to be desired and it takes a bit of time and patience to get used to the way things work (or sometimes don't work).
I think I can say that, while the Midjay is a great all-in-one machine, for this same reason is not so versatile as an arranger. For example, you can edit your styles only to a (very limited) degree, the chord recognition is fixed and cannot be modified and I am not even sure which one is, but have already seen that some chords are not recognized, etc.
So, while I am very happy to have a Ketron again in my home studio, I wouldn't be so happy if the Midjay was my one and only arranger.
[This message has been edited by Dreamer (edited 08-25-2006).]
_________________________
Korg Kronos 61 and PA3X-Pro76, Roland G-70, BK7-m and Integra 7, Casio PX-5S, Fender Stratocaster with Fralin pickups, Fender Stratocaster with Kinman pickups, vintage Gibson SG standard.