|
|
|
|
|
|
#111496 - 08/11/03 05:22 PM
Re: Vocal Recording Microphone
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/00
Posts: 43703
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111508 - 08/13/03 08:35 AM
Re: Vocal Recording Microphone
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/01/99
Posts: 10427
Loc: San Francisco Bay Area, CA, US...
|
I use an AKG 3000 condenser mic for recording and very happy with its performance. I actually had two, but accidently dropped one on stage, and it's now dead so I definitely don't recommend it for the rigors of live stage work. For live performance, I still utilize my old reliable & rugged (still working & sounding great for over 10 long years) EV 757 mic. Produces a sound (smooth) which seems to compliment my bari-tenor voice. Another thing I like is that it seems to produce the hottest output (strongest signal) of any other mic out there. This is a real plus, expecially when you like the convenience of plugging the mic directly into the keyboard without requiring a separate mic pre-amp. On my old Technics KN5000, only the EV757 provided enough signal output strength to the keyboard for adequate mic volume. Thankfully, the Yamaha Tyros includes a built in mic trim gain knob to boost the mic input signal, but I prefer not to rely too much on it, as I realize that this could potentially introduce added noise as well. After over ten years, I realize it's about time I update my EV mic, so seriously considering the Sennheiser E855, especially after hearing all the raves from Donny. I'm just curious what the 'signal output' level of the Sennheiser E855 is, and how it compares to EV brand mics. Another brand of mic (for stage performance) I've been considering moving to is Audix. All input appreciated. Scott
_________________________
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111518 - 08/14/03 07:30 AM
Re: Vocal Recording Microphone
|
Member
Registered: 07/23/02
Posts: 562
Loc: Oceanside, CA USA
|
Here is some information you may find enlightening:
GET CONDENSED Most stage mics are either dynamic or condenser. Dynamic mics offer rugged, reliable construction and a high performance-to-cost ratio. In fact, the use of lightweight neodymium magnets has allowed some dynamic mics to offer performance close to that of condensers.
Condenser mics offer excellent transient response and detail, extended high end, high output, and greater “reach” than dynamic mics. Once considered too fragile for gigging, a multitude of road-rugged condensers have been brought to market in recent years. Unlike dynamic mics, condenser mics require a power supply, which can take the form of an onboard battery, inline power supply or, most commonly in sound reinforcement applications, phantom power supplied by the mixing console via the mic cable.
Mics are designed with one of several possible pickup patterns (aka polar patterns) which determine how sensitive they are to sound coming from different directions. Just as higher frequencies beamed from an instrument or loudspeaker tend to be more directional than lows, mics tend more towards directionality at higher frequencies. Generally, the higher quality the mic, the more uniform the pattern at all frequencies.
The most common polar patterns for sound reinforcement are cardioid, hypercardioid, and supercardioid. A cardioid mic is most sensitive on-axis (the direction in which the mic is facing), about 6 dB less sensitive 90 degrees off-axis (directly to the side), and about 20 dB less sensitive 180 degrees off-axis (opposite to where the mic is pointed).
Supercardioid mics are less sensitive to the sides than are cardioid mics, but have a small lobe of sensitivity at 180 degrees off-axis. They are most insensitive at 120 degrees, as are hypercardioid mics. Hypercardioids are even less sensitive at 90 degrees than supercardioids, but more sensitive at 180 degrees.
Best regards, Mike
[This message has been edited by Idatrod (edited 08-14-2003).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|