|
|
|
|
|
|
#111921 - 11/29/01 10:10 AM
Re: Falling off the psr2000 bandwagon!
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2195
Loc: Catskill Mountains, NY
|
I'm still happy with the 2000 and am keeping mine. A lot of bang for the buck and a very useful board for doing small gigs. Along side of the PA80, many of the sounds aren't as good in my ears, but they will do fine for a gig. For more professional composing, the PA80 is my baby. The PA80 will have it's OS updated shortly, and the styles will change because they will have 4 fills per style. In addition korg mentions easier shortcuts to functions, so I am eagerly anticipating how the board will function after the OS is installed.
As far as ths differences between the 9000 and the 2000, there are a few features the 9k has of course that the 2k doesn't. ( sampling, harddrive options etc..) As for the sounds / styles between the two, I suppose there are differences, but for me it isn't easy to tell from a distance ( not being played side by side ). I could never see spending the kind of money on the 9000 or 9k pro when I had my PSR740 ( and now my 2000 ) because for my own uses I just wasn't getting that much more to justify spending triple what the 740 cost. I have spend a good deal of time with the 9000 so at least from a distance the styles and sounds were rather similar to the 740. So for the price of one PSR 9k pro, this year I bought a PA80 and a 2000. I think ( again for my uses ) I did very well. I guess I could say that the jury is still out a bit though 'til OS3 arrives on the PA80. John, you are quite right though.. A very nice board for the buck and a great add on for me, but the 2000 could never replace my PA80. Nothing that I have ever played from Yamaha ( "pro" synth/ workstations included ) can replace it for my ears.
AJ
_________________________
AJ
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111926 - 11/29/01 01:48 PM
Re: Falling off the psr2000 bandwagon!
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/01/99
Posts: 10427
Loc: San Francisco Bay Area, CA, US...
|
J.Larry: I too initially thought the 2000's keys felt lightweight and flimsy with a spongy feel at the bottom of the keystsroke, especially if played without any sound. It wasn't till AFTER I loaded sounds in that I changed my tune (I mean opinion); but come to think of it, I did play a wide variety of tunes when I initally demoed it, too. For some reason, the keyboard feel (though admittedly lightweight) actually seems to work with the 2000's sounds and its' slight spongy feel contributed to playing expressively. I dunno, maybe it's just me. Afterall, I've had to adapt to plenty of terrible broken down, out of tune, house pianos over the years. My treasured Steinway B Grand has a fully weighted grand action so I certainly appreciate what it offers, but for some weird reason, the 2000's keyboard feel is acceptable to me. Go figure. The PSR2000 is less than 1/2 of the price of the Technics KN6500 or 9000pro. I figure I could easily get two 2000's and always have a backup on hand . . . a thought. All of these boards are sound great, but each has unique features geared to suit different peoples tastes and requirements. Larry, I agree that the KN6500 is the Lexus' of arrangers. I'm still happy though with my Camry, it certainly gets the job done (nicely).
_________________________
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|