|
|
|
|
|
|
#113775 - 09/06/06 09:10 AM
Re: No step recording on G-70
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14269
Loc: NW Florida
|
Step recording? Can't say I've used that in 15 years. I always thought step recording was more for techno style music, something that would tend to lead you towards other, more cutting edge style keyboards rather than arrangers.
But hey, if you're looking for something to say negative about the G70 (and the lack of step recording DOES seem to be something of a stretch.....) how about 'it no longer has a Chord Sequencer'? Oh, that's right, YOUR arranger doesn't have one of those, either!
If you TRULY need step recording for trance and techno style musics, your best bet would be to use Fruity Loops or any of the MUCH better pattern and phrase-type softwares, and then transfer the SMF to a G70 for style conversion..... Step recording tends to be a very visual way of entering notes, and computer based softwares make this a MUCH easier process.
I must confess, sometimes people expecting these top of the line arrangers to do EVERYTHING seems a bit pointless. Anyone who can afford a $3500 arranger probably already has a computer (or two!), and weighing an arranger down with 'features' that can be done better, faster, and easier on a laptop of minimal specs seems to miss the point of the arranger.
Why spend countless R&D hours implementing a feature few users will use, when more time could be spent addressing the real needs of real arranger users. For every person who would actually use step recording (I know that if you use it, it seems a loss, but I still contend that nowadays, few arranger users use step mode anymore) there are dozens that would like more choices in patterns and fills, better ways to trigger the pattern or fill of your choice, easier ways to set up OTS settings, all the things that make an arranger work.......
HD recording, sampling, arpeggiation creation, step recording, all these 'features' are done FAR easier on a computer. Use the right tool for the job (at least it's easier to transfer from one to the other than it used to be!).......
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#113780 - 09/07/06 01:45 PM
Re: No step recording on G-70
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14269
Loc: NW Florida
|
The G70 DOES have a very good sequencer...... just no step-input capability (other than entering the notes manually in Micro Edit mode - a reasonable workaround).
But, as I said, step input only seems like a good way to enter music into the sequencer if you are going to do robotic types of music. You wouldn't want to step input a jazz tune, for instance. But other than step input, the G70's sequencer is very powerful, with the capability of recording live arranger play and then working further on the parts in 16 track sequencer mode.
It has a software style piano roll display if you like that, and a list edit facility, and pretty much all the usual editing tools you expect on a software sequencer. Just no step recording. Is that what you normally use? Probably not....... most of us PLAY our parts in (if it's complicated, just slow the tempo down!) and edit afterwards. Plus, there is an easy USB way to transfer sequences to and from a computer, for editing tasks that go beyond what the built-ins can do.........
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|