|
|
|
|
|
|
#114242 - 02/11/02 03:43 PM
Re: National Anthems ................USA
|
Member
Registered: 12/28/99
Posts: 86
Loc: Shreveport, LA, USA
|
The best vocal performances of the Star-Spangled Banner I have ever heard are done by high-quality Barbershop quartets. Until you have heard one of them do it, you don’t know what you’re missing! (DonM: I personally, along with about a dozen other River Cities Jubilee Barbershop Chorus members, will be performing it at the March 16 Mudbugs hockey game in the Bossier Arena, so reserve your tickets now! :-) ) Actually, IMHO, part of the problem is with the nature of the Anthem itself. Awhile back there was a movement to replace “The Star-Spangled Banner” with “America, the Beautiful” as our National Anthem (“The Star-Spangled Banner” would remain as a well-known patriotic song, just as “America, the Bautiful” is now). I must say I fully agree with that movement, and wish it would be done, for several reasons: - A National Anthem should be something that could be sung well by an average citizen. “The Star-Spangled Banner” does not qualify, due to its very wide pitch range (1½ octaves in the normal melody, two octaves when soloists try to get fancy-shmancy). “America, the Beautiful” does (only 1¼ octaves). The meter of “The Star-Spangled Banner” is also irregular, and its rhythm confusing, and its harmonic structure violates several accepted rules of harmonic progressions. Compare with “America the Beautiful,” which has CMD (Common Meter Doubled: 8686 8686) meter, and a harmonic structure which follows the usual rules, including resolutions from II7 or IIm7 chords back to the Tonic (I) down the Circle of Fifths. As for rhythm, we need not go past the very first note: “Oh—…” has to be stretched to cover two notes, while the very next time that melodic sequence occurs, it’s two syllables (words, actually): “Whose broad.…” This sort of thing is indicative of the greater underlying problem with our current Anthem, namely, that Francis Scott Key did not set out to write a song, but a poem. It was never meant to be set to music. To make matters worse, the music it is set to is the tune to an old English pub song. Sure, over the years we’ve gotten used to it being re-arranged into a martial maestoso-style National Anthem music with dramatic chord sequences, etc., but that doesn’t change the fact that underneath all the shiny chrome plating, it’s still an old drinking tune!
- A National Anthem should say something about the nation itself, not just a flag or a particular battle in a centuries-old war. Moreover, it should not insult a nation who was our enemy at that time but is an ally today, especially in these times when we need all the allies we can get. Have you ever read the third verse of “The Star-Spangled Banner” (note that most sheet music and hymnal versions omit the original third verse and renumber the fourth verse as verse #3)? The original third verse is very strongly anti-British, almost to the point of Anglophobia! Compare that with the third verse of “America, the Beautiful,” which could just as easily apply to the FDNY and NYPD and especially Flight 93 heroes of September 11, 2001, as to the Revolutionary War heroes: “Oh, beau-ti-ful, for he-roes proved / In lib-er-a-ting strife. / Who, more than self, their coun-try loved, / And mer-cy more than life!” And, of course, the whole song is very systematically about America as a whole.
[This message has been edited by COMALite J (edited 02-11-2002).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|