|
|
|
|
|
|
#114332 - 10/27/03 11:09 PM
OT: Cell Phones & Service Provider Recommendations
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/01/99
Posts: 10427
Loc: San Francisco Bay Area, CA, US...
|
Who here owns a cell phone? Anyone here use or recommend 'Verizon Wireless' as their cell phone service provider? I've recently decided it's time I get a cell phone again (after several years w/o one), especially after just having missed an important call the other day which cost me losing a high paying gig to someone else because I wasn't immediately reachable by phone. I live in the major metropolitan area of San Francisco, CA, so there's quite a few cell phone service provider choices available here (AT&T Wireless, Verizon Wireless, Cingular Wireless, T-Mobile, and Sprint). Unfortunately, in my 'immediate' neighborhood, ONLY Verizon provides a dependable strong phone signal to my house. The others provide (to my area) a weak signal at best, resulting in frequent voice signal breakup & even total diconnection at times. I heard that AT&T, Cingular and T-Mobile exclusively utilize the newer GSM phones which unforutunately, because the technology is a lot newer, offers rather spotty cell phone coverage, while Verizon, which utilizes the older Digital technology phones, currently provides far better comprehensive coverage to all areas (including my neighborhood). The downside of going with Verizon is that their rates are substantially higher than the other mentioned cell phone service providers. I'm really interested in hearing from others here about 'your' experience with cell phone providers, as well as what your personal recommendation is on a brand/model cell phone. Many thanks, Scott
_________________________
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#114338 - 10/28/03 08:47 PM
Re: OT: Cell Phones & Service Provider Recommendations
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/24/99
Posts: 3305
Loc: Reseda, California USA
|
Scott, For years I was using AT&T. Then, last year my daughter started UCLA and at her apartment she had no service. We asked all the other student in the area which provider they used and all said Verizon was best is Westwood, Ca. I called AT&T and asked them about this problem and they admitted that there cells were not good in the area. I went to Verizon and purchased a new phone (Motorola V60i). I then realized that all the areas where I live that I got no service with AT&T now worked with Verizon. As each of my AT&T contracts have expired, I've switched to another Verizon phone. Now, I have 5 in my family. The other thing I like alot about Verizon is that when I have any problems with a phone, they simply replace it with a new one even if it is out of the warranty period or not. The only downsize is that here in LA, there are not very many Verizon stores and the lines can be quite long when I need to visit one. I am very pleased with their service here in Southern California. A few months ago, one of the local stations did a rating of all the cell providers and Verizon was the best. George Kaye Kaye's music Scene Reseda, California
_________________________
George Kaye Kaye's Music Scene (Closed after 51 years) West Hills, California (Retired 2021)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#114340 - 10/29/03 11:23 AM
Re: OT: Cell Phones & Service Provider Recommendations
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/01/99
Posts: 10427
Loc: San Francisco Bay Area, CA, US...
|
Thanks to everyone for your responses. As I mentioned, in my area, GSM coverage still hasn't reached maturity yet as there's still a lot of dead zones, especially in my neighborhood, so my choice is: going with Verizon (which uses CDMA) or AT&T, who offer you a choice between GSM or TDMA service. GSM may be the wave of the near future but coverage is currently spotty, and TDMA provides good area coverage NOW, because it's been around for so long (over 12 years). I like Verizon (they use CDMA) and are known in the industsry as providing the BEST coverage nationwide) but their rates (at least here in the Bay Area) suck. Their local calling area plan rate is MUCH higher than AT&Ts (TDMA) similarly equivilant plan, and Verizon's DOESN"T even INCLUDE free long distance as AT&T does. I'm currently auditioning the AT&T (TDMA type service) cell phone on a 14 day free trial and finding both the price and signal coverage throughout my area (East Bay) very good, and dramatically improved over the AT&T 'GSM' phone I auditioned earlier. My concern is whether going with a 'TDMA' type cell phone may result in outdated service sooner than later, as I hear (rumor?) that TDMA will be eventually phased out & completely REPLACED by GSM. The problem with cell phone carriers is that to get a real good deal (free phone & expensive activasion fees waived), you got to commit to a 2 year contract. If AT&T will be willing to migrate me over to GSM at a later date (9-12 months or after GSM towers become more implemented here) and not penalize me, as that means switching to a GSM phone & GSM service, I may go with AT&T TDMA phone service. Curious to hear what the cell phone experts here think about the TDMA/GSM issue. In closing, I realize many of you may be thinking this cell phone thing to be OT, but it's actually become an essential tool for gigging musicians. I'm quickly realizing that we can't live w/o one; just gotta remember to turn the dammed ringer off when performing. Scott
_________________________
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|