![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/left_span.gif) |
#116483 - 09/16/06 07:22 PM
Re: PA1X vs T2 for dance-trance music
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/10/04
Posts: 1247
Loc: New York
|
I actually don't agree with most of the comments here. As a T2 owner, I think the styles are good, but they are not supported by good multi-pads which would be a must for good trance-dance.
Put it this way, the demo that was posted above from YouTube, is pretty much representative of what the T2 can do. If you're happy with that, then the T2 is for you.
Ironically, the old Yamaha PSR 8000, had much better dance and trance styles, and tonnes of good quality dance multi-pads! (I'm talking about the arrangements - obviously the T2 'sounds' are better). I used to do full dance sets using these styles, but with the Tyros, I don't have as many options.
I'm not sure why they didn't upgrade these into the Tyros.
Chony
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/right_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/left_span.gif) |
#116486 - 09/16/06 09:07 PM
Re: PA1X vs T2 for dance-trance music
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14344
Loc: NW Florida
|
Although the T2 will import aif and wav, it does not import any multi-sample format, so to import a techno kit, for instance, or a good set of minimoog samples, whatever, you have to do a LOT of work to make your own keymaps, programming, etc.. Korg will import keymaps from Akai disks, amongst others, so a lot of the work is already done for you. That's what I mean by a closed system. It only reads T2 keymaps, no others.......
Wait til you try to program a good, multi-velocity drum kit by laboriously importing each and every wav, and prepare the keymap and velocity splits...... Talk about tedious!
Akai is the de facto standard for hardware samplers, and as such, any pro sampler should be able to import this format.......
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/right_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/left_span.gif) |
#116491 - 09/17/06 03:52 AM
Re: PA1X vs T2 for dance-trance music
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/16/05
Posts: 1116
Loc: Sydney, NSW, Australia
|
Originally posted by Diki: Yeah, right..... keep telling yourself that. Doesn't it burn you, though, to have paid for a feature that is, essentially, crippled?
No arguments about the sound quality of the internals, though. But there's always room for more......
Just keep asking Yamaha for Akai format reading..... Who knows? Enough of you ask, and Yamaha might add it (or get Chickensys to write a computer converter)....! Nah it doesnt burn me, neither does it burn other T2 owners. if we wanted a proper sampler then we would have bought a synth... cheers mate ![](http://www.synthzone.com/ubbs/smile.gif)
_________________________
Roland G70 / Roland BK9 / Roland GW-8L / Roland Fantom O6 / Yamaha Motif XS / Technics KN6500
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/right_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_2.gif) |
|
|