|
|
|
|
|
|
#119990 - 01/03/07 05:10 AM
My first 5 minutes with the SD5
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/24/99
Posts: 1675
Loc: Milford, CT, USA
|
Here goes,
picked it up, wow it's allot heavier than my T2.
Turned it on and the first thing I noticed was it was exactly like the SD1 display.
I did not have it hooked up to a PA yet, so I just had it playing through it's own speakers.
a funk style was already selected so I just hit a chord and my first reaction was " man these drums are going to blow these speakers "
went through a bunch of styles, played some sounds, screwed around with the midi files.
So as sounds go I found myself looking for the extras of the T2, especially in the guitar and trumpet sounds,. there were no extra vibrato or string slides and such.
Noticed I was spoiled with the realism of the solo sounds on the T2. I ketp saying to myself this sounds very synthy shen playing the SD trumpet and brass, the strings were very filling, big and thick sounding, not as detailed as the T2 but I think better for thickin up stuff.
Played a couple of organs which I was leaning towards the SD on these, they just seemed more pleasing to me and more real. I did notice that when I turned on the Rotor effect, there was a massive click then the sound was gone then came back, probably a software glitch.
I also miss or am spoiled from, the one touch settings linked to styles, or suggested sounds for a style, or maybe I just don't know how to activate it.
Also miss the ability to hit a variations and have a fill bring me into it. I know you can use the jump feature and a variation will bring you to the next variation but I liked determining where it was going first.
Not as many sounds as the SD1 or T2. the meat and potatoes sounds are there.
I still need to figure out the best way to switch from style to midi file to style for live playing. I'm not quite sure if they have changed the filing system or is it still constricted to 8 characters, (bummer)
So far I'm still on the fence.
the drums and bass are much more in your face and live sounding which gives me the feeling of a more motivating playing experince, but not sure if I like the rawness of the whole thing yet,
Tonight I'll put them both through my Bose PAS's and see what's I think
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#120003 - 01/03/07 05:30 PM
Re: My first 5 minutes with the SD5
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/24/99
Posts: 1675
Loc: Milford, CT, USA
|
Thanks AJ.
Did you get my email?
I started looking into the manual more and found some more answers,
yes there is an easy and fast way to go from style to midi file and back.
Is there a way to use arrangement D instead of the riff feature?
Also another T2 vs SD5. Styles are more live band with the SD5, meaning longer style bars with small variations within to give small changes so there is less of a canned style sound.
seem to be missing some key styles and sounds from the SD1, hopefully i can add them.
almost everything is accessabel through buttons, barely any hidden menus
i think i'm right with the limited 8 characters on file names, damn damn damn.
GREAT..GREAT..Great midi file playback.
there are 16 assignable tabs that are amazing, great idea. it's basically having 16 more buttons that you can decide will do anything you want them to.
much better reg system ( excluding the 8 character limit )
getting back to sounds. within arranger playing the SD5 sounds which I thought were lacking are perfect in the mix. the T2 sounds are great but all those nuances get lost within the style, so they actually start to sound a little thin,
I need to sleep, can't even type correctly.
I'm hoping to get the SD5 ready for a gig in 2 weeks,
I might be selling the T2, can't completely decide yet.
Later
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#120011 - 01/05/07 04:38 AM
Re: My first 5 minutes with the SD5
|
Member
Registered: 10/02/04
Posts: 113
Loc: UK
|
Originally posted by Dnj: Mike nothing new about your opinions ...we all know the differences in sound between these two.. That was partly my point - I didn't have any first hand knowledge of how these two sounded, and don't have any bias either way between the two makes. My reaction to these files was therefore not 'preconditioned' in any way by previous contact with these instruments. Originally posted by Dnj: ....& I cannot argue your points given above...But...there is MUCH More to the "complete" package then just the sound & herin lies the differences in opinions and choices for each players needs....ergonomics, navigation, on-board features, weight, display, key-feel, support, etc etc etc .....for recording that would be another story, but for performing live you really have to dig into your soul & personal needs as a musician! ) Totally agree - which is why I have ended up using top end arrangers from Korg & Roland in recent years. Not because either make is inherently better or worse than Yamaha or Ketron (or any other obvious competitor, for that matter) but because the instruments I chose were best suited to my purpose. As a simple example to confirm exactly what you are saying, I absolutely hate pitch bend wheels, much prefering a side-to-side lever. As a result, I don't even bother auditioning any of the Yamaha range as they all use a wheel for this function. I make heavy use of pitch bend, so it doesn't matter how good the rest of an instrument is, if this 'must have' lever is not present it won't be on my try-out list. Others feel the same way regarding 76 note keybeds. In my case, I've had both 76 & 61 & can live with either. But you're absolutely right - an arranger is very musch a sum of it's parts. It isn't always the best sounding one that gives the most ultimate satisfaction. Usability is just as important. Regards - Mike
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|