Originally posted by Dnj:
Mike nothing new about your opinions ...we all know the differences in sound between these two..
That was partly my point - I
didn't have any first hand knowledge of how these two sounded, and don't have any bias either way between the two makes. My reaction to these files was therefore not 'preconditioned' in any way by previous contact with these instruments.
Originally posted by Dnj:
....& I cannot argue your points given above...But...there is MUCH More to the "complete" package then just the sound & herin lies the differences in opinions and choices for each players needs....ergonomics, navigation, on-board features, weight, display, key-feel, support, etc etc etc .....for recording that would be another story, but for performing live you really have to dig into your soul & personal needs as a musician! )
Totally agree - which is why I have ended up using top end arrangers from Korg & Roland in recent years. Not because either make is inherently better or worse than Yamaha or Ketron (or any other obvious competitor, for that matter) but because the instruments I chose were best suited to my purpose.
As a simple example to confirm exactly what you are saying, I absolutely hate pitch bend wheels, much prefering a side-to-side lever. As a result, I don't even bother auditioning any of the Yamaha range as they all use a wheel for this function. I make heavy use of pitch bend, so it doesn't matter how good the rest of an instrument is, if this 'must have' lever is not present it won't be on my try-out list. Others feel the same way regarding 76 note keybeds. In my case, I've had both 76 & 61 & can live with either.
But you're absolutely right - an arranger is very musch a sum of it's parts. It isn't always the best sounding one that gives the most ultimate satisfaction. Usability is just as important.
Regards - Mike