|
|
|
|
|
|
#131773 - 03/13/05 02:04 PM
Simulation - How close a real B3?!
|
Member
Registered: 02/20/05
Posts: 88
|
I am a huge fan of organs. I've been doing gigs with solos on Roland VK series organs and real leslie cabs and it feels great! But I really want to get the vibes on the real thing without spending as much as the real thing costs. I want to go with a keyboard/software, where do I land? Well, when it comes to keyboards I think Roland is the company that makes the best organ simulations. However, I think software based simulation is getting closer to the real thing. In my opinion it is generally the rotary speaker effect that they cannot simulate well enough, the organ sounds themself seem to get pretty dark and real.(I have heard real B3s only on records) An interesting peace of software is NI B4. I have only tested it with a bad sound card but I thought it could compete with the organs in the Yamaha Tyros. What would be interesting to test would be B4 with a real leslie cab! Have any of you tried such a combination? What do you think? Well, anyways, here is a comparison between the real thing and the NI B4. In my opinion the rotary effect of the B4 is not as good and the sound is a little sharper which makes a difference. Check it out: Comparison between a real B3 and NI B4BTW, what do you think about the B3 sounds in the Roland G-70? I have only heard the demos, but I thought it was good sounding, much better than for instance the Korg PA-1X...! Best regards, YamahaAndy [This message has been edited by YamahaAndy (edited 03-13-2005).] [This message has been edited by YamahaAndy (edited 03-13-2005).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#131790 - 03/17/05 02:25 PM
Re: Simulation - How close a real B3?!
|
Senior Member
Registered: 01/02/04
Posts: 7305
Loc: Lexington, Ky, USA
|
My "portable" Hammond set-up is a Hammond XB-2 and a Motion Sound top rotor box (don't think Motion Sound sells this one anymore-it it is a small box with horns-about 18 lbs).
I use the Hammond on the bottom of the rack and my Ketron on the top. That way, I have left-handed bass through the Hammond when I need it, and doppler effect when I need organ sound. I use a channel on the PA for the bottom rotor simulator (15" cabinets).
Occasionally, for big jobs, I use a tube 147RV Leslie with the XB-2. That's better!
Still, I wouldn't want to move it, but a REAL B-3 with a 147 is THE BEST! My one night a week job at a country club let's me play "old school" without having to move the "monster". Luckily, when I was playing B-3 all the time, the jobs were all "house" jobs, so I only moved every few years or so.
Russ
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#131791 - 03/17/05 02:29 PM
Re: Simulation - How close a real B3?!
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2195
Loc: Catskill Mountains, NY
|
You'll need a decent to good quality soundcard, preferably with ASIO type drivers. Otherwise you will notice latency, or delay between the time you press a note or use a pitch wheel and the time you actually hear it. Even a Soundblaster is ok, if it has updated kx drivers, or you use the freeware ASIO4all, which pretty much makes any soundcard ASIO compliant. There is a link to Asio4all on the main SZ page BTW.
For now, if you are using a lesser soundcard, try ASIO4all and see if that eliminates the sticky note problem.
You'll need a host. If you just want to try out one softsynth, with no added vst effects, try Tobybear's freeware Simple VST Host, available at KVR audio. It works fine. Otherwise, you'll need a soft sequencer / daw ( Sonar, Cubase, FL studio, edtc ) or a standalone app like Xlutop chainer ( approx 49 Usd ) or Brainspawn Forte. There are even a few freeware daws out there that now support multiple Vst instruments and effects.
Does this stuff tie me to the computer ? Absolutely. Does it hamper my music making ability ? Only if I let it. Often I used to start a piece out on hardware, but the finished product would go to software if I thought it would be sonically better ( usually it is ). But... using a simple app like Chainer has freed up so much of the technical workings for me, that it feels like I'm playing a real instrument again. My laptop is simply another module now, and I use Chainer to host the instruments. I keep all of my Vst instruments and effects on the laptop, but I generally use no other daw software on it, except that I keep One Man Band on it for live work and Adobe Audition on it so that I can make it a portable daw for recording away from the home studio. I also kept FL studio on it in case I want to make quick beats away from home.
All of the daws and actual software programs ( Band in a Box, FL Studio, Sonar, jammer pro etc ) now reside and are primarily used on my PC, and I connect the laptop output to the PC's daws by going right through my hardware mixer, just like all of my hardware instruments do.
AJ
[This message has been edited by Bluezplayer (edited 03-17-2005).]
_________________________
AJ
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#131797 - 03/18/05 05:36 PM
Re: Simulation - How close a real B3?!
|
Member
Registered: 02/27/04
Posts: 741
Loc: Victoria, British Columbia
|
If and when I need a B3 sound, I get what I need (and then some)..from my T3. It's just a matter of going into it and editting the parameters and tweaking 'til you get the sound you're after. That said, unless you run it out of a 15" or better, I honestly can't see where you'd get that full sound required, short of using an honest to goodness B3 with a leslie cabinet. I get a lot of fellow kb players that I associate with commenting on the great B3 sounds I'm able to achieve. Sure..I'd love to park myself behind a B3 for real, but when you're gigging regularly....one little problem arises.... .. Transportation. My 3 cents worth....with apologies to Frostbyte. btw: The CX-3 is a very sweet ride. I just wish they didn't cost so much up here in Canucklehead Land. ...Just my thots. ------------------ ...shboom[This message has been edited by shboom (edited 03-18-2005).]
_________________________
...shboom
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|