|
|
|
|
|
|
#146600 - 05/14/06 05:29 AM
Re: How important is the weight of a instrument
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/08/02
Posts: 15576
Loc: Forest Hill, MD USA
|
The physical weight of a keyboard has absolutely nothing to do with it's quality of sound or construction. A good example of this can be readily seen when tape recorders first came on the market, many of which weighed nearly 100 pounds and sported huge reels holding inch-wide audio tape. Even at high speeds the recordings were noisy and required lots of editing and filtration to insure a good quality end product. Today, tape recorders are essentially a thing of the past. They've been replaced by lightweight digital recorders that provide outstanding recording quality that is noise free. Some weigh less than 10 pounds and include an excellent, multi-channel mixer that's part of the package. The same is now true with keyboards. I've read posts where individuals touted their keyboards as the best because the housing was made of heavy-guage steel. "Yep, I can drop this off a 10 store building, run over it with a truck and it will still play." You must be kidding! Why in the hell would anyone in their right mind want a keyboard that weighs 50 to 60 pounds? It will not play or sound any better than one that weighs 30 pounds, and if you play for a living, and lug the equipment around 7 days a week, you'll be damned glad your keyboard, amp, mixer, etc.. is made of lightweight material that's easy to transport. If your keyboard never leaves the house, weight is of no consequence. If you hope to perform for a living, buy something that is lightweight, sounds great and has a user friendly operating system. Keyboards were never made to be dropped, banged around, slammed into walls, run over by a truck or pounded upon with your fist--they were meant to be played. Cheers, Gary ------------------ Travlin' Easy
_________________________
PSR-S950, TC Helicon Harmony-M, Digitech VR, Samson Q7, Sennheiser E855, Custom Console, and lots of other silly stuff!
K+E=W (Knowledge Plus Experience = Wisdom.)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#146601 - 05/14/06 05:47 AM
Re: How important is the weight of a instrument
|
Member
Registered: 08/12/02
Posts: 673
Loc: malaga, spain
|
If you have an X stand,how about fixing an end plate onto your keyboard stand so that when you have finished your gig, you tilt the board and stand together down onto your trolley,so now your board and stand is nearly verticle,close up the legs and away you go.To set up, have your board verticly on trolley lower legs into position and lever your board into horizontal. easy 8> )
remember the story of a lorry that got stuck under the bridge ,it held up traffic for hours,all the officials was saying if you move the lorry the bridge may collapse,if you put hydrolics under the bridge the lorry won,t be damaged so you can drive it out,but no-one would take the responsiblity of the best choice. A little boy said, WHY DON,T YOU LET THE AIR OUT OF THE TYRES OF THE LORRY and then both will be ok.
[This message has been edited by nardoni2002 (edited 05-14-2006).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#146602 - 05/14/06 05:51 AM
Re: How important is the weight of a instrument
|
Member
Registered: 05/08/06
Posts: 464
Loc: Southeastern PA, USA
|
I have a love/hate relationship with the weight of my Roland FP5. It is a weighted key, 88-key instrument. I am a classically trained pianist and a gigging jazz musician. I love the feel of playing with the instrument. It affords me the opportunity to explore a wide range of expression in my playing. I hate lugging it around. On a gig, add to that a stand, amplification, cable/stuff bag and the hate just grows. Some people may say a cart is the solution. That helps if the gig is handicap-accessable all the way to the stage. If not, your language gets very colorful as you unload/reload the cart to get passed steps.
I use the softcase for the Yamaha S80 with this keyboard. It fits the Roland perfectly, has wheels and a strap. I can strap it to my back and wheel it and move it around hands-free. That part is easy. Lifting it in/out car and on/off stand at home and the stand at the gig is a little less fun. There has been plenty of times the keyboard sat in the case and not on my stand at home because I didn't feel like dealing with it or knew I had another gig coming up soon and would just have to pack it up again.
For the future I am looking at 61 keys for the main keyboard with a 2nd 88 key controller that I will use when needed. For me, in the perfect world, Yamaha comes out with a 76 key arranger. If I only played the keyboard at home, or took it out only on a very rare occasion, I wouldn't care about weight. Otherwise, it is of high priority.
[This message has been edited by RobertG (edited 05-14-2006).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#146606 - 05/14/06 07:54 AM
Re: How important is the weight of a instrument
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/01/99
Posts: 10427
Loc: San Francisco Bay Area, CA, US...
|
I've spent too many years in envy of fellow band members able to simply carry (in one hand) their music instrument to/from rehearsals & gigs, while I had to struggle carting around my 70+ lb keyboard, suffering back aches along the way to go back to that. Now that my keyboard transport weight is finally begining to inch in the direction of my non-keyboard gigging musician brothers and sisters, (Tyros2: 32 lbs) no longer am I willing to transport a keyboard over 40 lbs. Considering the fact that a keyboard's appropriately protective case can easily weigh 20+ lbs, a 49.6 lb keyboard like the Roland E80 with appropriate case will weigh 70+ lbs. In addition to weight, the keyboards dimensions (length/width & depth), bulkiness, and balance ergonomics, are other critically important transport factors to consider. It's far more difficult to manuever a 76 or 88 note long keyboard than a shorter 61 note one, and if the majority of the keyboard's weight rests on one end only, this makes it more difficult to manuever still. Balancing keyboard sound quality, with transport weight and size (61 vs 76-88 keys) are important considerations for the gigging musician. - Scott
_________________________
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#146614 - 05/14/06 03:52 PM
Re: How important is the weight of a instrument
|
Senior Member
Registered: 06/25/99
Posts: 16735
Loc: Benton, LA, USA
|
Fran, the Roland G800 I had started falling apart a month after I bought it. The spring in the Joystick broke, the buttons started sticking and getting to where you had to push them very hard to make them work. Even the paint wore off where you had to remember what button did what. Maybe they improved all that in the G1000. Or maybe I had a lemon. Anyway, in all the years I've played Yamahas, with assorted side journeys with Ketron, Korg, and Technics, I have never had one mechanical problem with them. Not being a piano player, I also don't like the heavy keys. And even when I had onboard speakers, most nights I disabled them. Isn't it great we have so many choices now? Anyway, your compromises are different from mine! DonM
_________________________
DonM
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#146618 - 05/15/06 08:07 AM
Re: How important is the weight of a instrument
|
Member
Registered: 12/03/99
Posts: 732
Loc: Phoenix, AZ USA
|
I second the opinion that for home users weight is not important, but for the people who gig with their instruments, the LIGHT WEIGHT IS OF PARAMOUNT IMPORTANCE.
Fran,
Yes, I too still like my 41 lb G1000, but the problem is when we say that, Roland interprets it as saying that it's OK for them to make the weight of the next instrument (G70) 3 lbs more. That is not the case at all with me - I would rather that the G1000 (and all newer instruments) weigh 35 lbs or less - and that is quite possible to do without sacrificing the key action, or build quality. I like having a metal frame (to protect against minor bumps which may otherwise crack a cheap plastic case), but it is not necessary anymore with current plastic technologies. Even with the metal case, if the manufacturers were more concerned about the weight and ergonomics, instead of the asthetic look of the instruments, instrument they could easily have built a 76 key instrument weighing only 35 lbs. Ketron does it. Why not Roland or Korg (or GEM)? Is it because they are targeting their big boards for home or studio, and not for gigging?That is the only explanation I can think of.
There are people whose technique relies on having fully weighted keys with realistic action - those do weigh more, though not necessarily in the 60 lbs range. But for the majority of us, satisfied with good semi-weighted action (which is what the best thing that most portable arrangers provide anyway), the instruments MUST be made easy to carry around.
The good styles and sounds do not weigh a lot. There are laptop computers, with relatively large screens, keyboards, lots of memory and large hard drives that weigh less than 3-4 lbs, fully capable of reproducing even the best sounds and styles (and doing a lot more too). The arranger makers may not have the engineering resources lf the large PC makers, but with just a little thought they should be able to easily make a 7 lb module, and the equivalent electronics to go inside a keyboard (without needing a case) could be even lighter. What does a portable piano weigh? around 30 lbs (with 88 weighted keys). The arranger version should make it 37 lbs. A 76 key controller? you do the math. Anything more to me is the gigging performers' needs.
Regards, Alex
_________________________
Regards, Alex
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|