|
|
|
|
|
|
#147657 - 11/05/04 01:52 PM
Re: PLG150-AP is shipping
|
Senior Member
Registered: 07/09/02
Posts: 1087
Loc: Atlanta, Georgia
|
Ok, I've spent about an hour and a half with the PLG150-AP installed in my 9000 Pro and have been comparing it to a 9000 Pro with the older PLG150-PF installed and a Motif ES 8.
First - well I'm not as blown away with the sound as I expected; there are some flaws with the sample transitions in the critical lower midrange that are very disappointing.
Let me start by saying that the AP has a good piano sound; better than the Motif ES famed triple strike "Full Grand" by far (which I always disliked) and better than the 9000 Pro's "Live!Grand" by far, and even better than the PLG150-PF's pianos but not by as much of a margin as the first two instruments I mentioned. The immediate thing I noticed was the high end notes sound extremely realistic with all the overtones I often miss with other piano emulations. It really sounds like an expensive grand piano when you tickle those high notes. The lower midrange sounds a little dull to me, but so do many real grand pianos... I adjusted the velocity curve to "Soft1" and that brought out a little more tone. With the velocity curve on "Normal" you practically have to beat the keyboard to death to get any brightness at all... unless of course you select some of the brighter presets that seem better suited to rock. And the bass piano tones are great with lot of resonance. It's the midrange tones just below middle C where most chording occurs that I dislike, and there is an obvious sample change from G# to A below middle C that outright sucks. From that G# down to D# the samples suffer from sample-slowdown syndrome and they don't sound as realistic as the rest of the tones. It's obvious no matter what preset you try. The PLG150-PF by comparison doesn't have this problem at all, but it sticks out like a sore thumb on the PLG150-AP. This is the AP's biggest flaw IMHO. BTW: the AP piano sounds very "stretch-tuned" to me with no non-stretched variations available.
The PLG150-AP seemingly has one purpose in mind: solo piano playing. It's more expressive than anything I've compared it to from Yamaha so far but I don't have a P250 or the like to compare unfortunately. But that damn lower midrange really seems like a small tragedy for what is otherwise a very nice expansion card.
A quick mention about the other sounds: they are all variations of the acoustic piano, with more/less reverb and EQ and then some have some S/H trickery with questionable usefulness. Pretty much what you expect... no EP's or clavs, although there is an imitation dulcimer patch.
Oh - need I mention that as usual with Yamaha the documentation is POOR! Not one word of how to use this card with the 9000 Pro yet again (I had a lengthy debate with Mark Anderson about this in regards to the PLG150-DR and he told me that they would address this problem in the future - they didn't). And there are parameters that have no definition/description at all in the thin manual, such as "DSP Stage2 (slow/fast)". This means what?
Yamaha includes a CD but there's only 324k of data on it which would've easily fit on a floppy, including demos and plug-in voice data for the Motif, S90, etc.
Is the PLG150-AP worth the money? IMHO, just barely... it could've been better.
[This message has been edited by The Pro (edited 11-05-2004).]
_________________________
Jim Eshleman
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|