|
|
|
|
|
|
#151875 - 04/28/05 10:38 AM
Re: OT: A civil discussion about OT threads
|
Senior Member
Registered: 08/28/04
Posts: 2206
Loc: Louisiana, USA
|
Jim, I am not sure this version of UBB forum software can do a Sticky.
Okay, you asked for suggestions. Here's one.
Everyone send Nigel $5. If he so chooses to accept this suggestion. Obviously, it's his call. With the contributions, he can update the UBB software.
The latest versions of UBB (by Infopop) are fantastic. I made forum suggestions months ago and Nigel said this version could not do it. So, an update COULD do it.
For instance, I really like to know where a person is from. I mean, country, at least. It helps to know if you are communicating with someone outside your own country. It can even explain potential misreads in what they wrote.
All kinds of bells and whistles. Like show how many posts someone has made. For instance, if you see a ridiculous post by someone and you see "1" post, that's a red flag.
Another thing newer versions do that is SO helpful is show who posted LAST to a thread. You can tell if you've already read the thread.
As for OT threads, one more time, I see it as a total non-issue. You and I obviously differ on that. If OT threads ARE to be an issue, I'd like to know the score. Are they going to be allowed or not?
I also note someone did an OT today and did not preface it with "OT." People forget to do this but if you are drafting a Sticky, you could say "Please write "OT" before each off-topic post."
If a Sticky is drafted, here's another suggestion. Drives me bananas on ANY forum. I even wrote up a webpage but haven't posted it. It's about Subject titles. 95% of the titles on this particular forum are good. These are bad...
Hey look! I have a question Ever seen this? Question
You get the idea.
Sometimes, there are gems underneath titles I never click on, I am sure.
One more. This is annoying. People who 'chat' back and forth about stuff that should be done via email. We're all guilty occasionally but sometimes, it gets out of hand. You waste your time reading stuff they should be discussing privately... post after post.
_________________________
~ ~ ~ Bill
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#151878 - 04/28/05 11:23 AM
Re: OT: A civil discussion about OT threads
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/01/99
Posts: 10427
Loc: San Francisco Bay Area, CA, US...
|
Originally posted by Sheriff: Oh, you think that you are other than other musicians? Wow, I have to stomach this toad... Sheriff, I'm shocked at your acerbic reply to Jim (the Pro), especially after having thought you to be such a friendly ez going player here. I need to stand up to personally vouch (having met him personally) that Jim is neither a toad or bad person. On the contrary, he & his wife Sheila are a terrific couple that I throughly enjoyed meeting while in Florida. Jim (Esh) I suppose just can't hold back expressing strong & often controversial sentiments (some which I agree and others I do not). Originally posted by Sheriff: I thought this forum is called SynthZone which means to me a zone for synthesizers not for arrangers... Yes, the overall Synthzone website itself is intended for synthesizer enthusiasts, but this specific forum entitled: "General Arranger Keyboard Forum" is specifically dedicated to 'Arranger Keyboard' discussion, of which there is NO OTHER place on the web of its kind where we can freely discuss & openly express our opinion on any/all brands of arrangers & arranger keyboard music making without fear or censorship. Because there are already countless scores of Synthesizer forums out there to visit already, Some degree of OT-other music related, or personal trivia is of course expected (and welcome by me) of course, but I concur with Jim that PRESERVING the focus of our forum as an ARRANGER KEYBOARD specific discussion group essential. Just my opinion as usual. Scott
_________________________
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|