|
|
|
|
|
|
#153240 - 11/10/01 03:08 PM
Advice, buying arranger
|
Junior Member
Registered: 11/10/01
Posts: 3
|
Hi!
This is my first post but I've read this board for a short while. I've played electronic organs for 25 years, Italian, Hammond, Yamaha, but my current organ has past 10 years and I've decided to buy an arranger keyboard instead. While there is no dealers in my area I'm doing research on the webb before taking my car out for a one day trip. So far I've found out that I've got PSR9000, KN6500, PA80, SD1 and VA7 to choose from. Internal speakers or 76 keys are secondary issues. I play mostly pop, rock, ballads, gospel, country but also love playing hymns using just organ vocies. Most important to me would be good styles in those areas, good solo voices and good organ voices. I don't need vocal harmonizer but want to have aftertouch. I will probably not use any sequencer much but want to be able to load lot of new styles. Can someone give me some advice on which, lets says maybe two, boards that may be most interessting for me to check out. Have I missed any board in my list? Anything special I should think of, as a keyboard newbie, when visiting a dealer? Can I expect the dealer to be able to give me advice for my needs and "show what the boards goes for" before trying myself?
Thanks BH
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#153241 - 11/10/01 03:59 PM
Re: Advice, buying arranger
|
Member
Registered: 10/09/01
Posts: 82
|
BH, You opened up a can of worms for all of us to climb out of the walls, all with subjective opinons as to what we like. In arranger keyboards I've had a PSR 9000 and now have a PA 80. I think both are excellent arranger boards, but I will key in on one thing you said and that is the organs....I think the PA has better organs digital drawbars etc. I think the 9000 has better pianos, the rest is probably a closer coin flip. I think the PA 80 operates a bit easier for me than my 9000 did. The PA has tons of downloadable styles, today I think Fabio put 200+ styles up for download free from all different genres. I think the final decision will come down to you sitting and playing both for sound and user friendliness, because you'll like some things better on one then something better on the other etc. Not knowing a whole lot about you off the top of my head, I would think the VA 7 might be more than you're looking for a bit more difficult to get around, a bit more expensive than the PA anyway and I think you'll find it has more features on it then I think you need or want. As far as having a salesperson that is knowledgable.....in my experience don't count on it, do your homework and just call on them for two things. 1. Could you plug this in please 2. How much. Terry
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#153246 - 11/11/01 07:48 AM
Re: Advice, buying arranger
|
Member
Registered: 06/09/01
Posts: 993
Loc: Belo Horizonte,Minas Gerais,Br...
|
Hello BH. I live in Belo Horizonte, Brasil and at last years(20)working as profi musician and music software teacher.I had played a extensive amount of arr. kbs as Yamaha(5700,6700,6000, 630,8000,730,740,9000)Korg(I3,I2,I30)Roland(E20,30,70,86,96,G800,G1000,Em2000,VA7)and Technics(1500,1600,5000),each one with good and bad features.The dream Kb would have: -Easy operation and good voices as a Yamaha 9000 -Friendly screen as a Technics -Good styles as a Korg or Solton -Good Midi files operation as a Roland. -Excellent harmony interface as 9000.
and NO!!!
-Weight of Yamaha 9000. -Korg's difficulty to read fast change of chords(sometimes a broken change) -Technics incapacity to make midi files with real time acc and bad acc. sounds with transpose. -Touch screen , variphrase(a expensive joke)and poor styles of Roland VA7. I think that you must read all George Kaye and AJ evaluations. Another important topic is evaluate the technical support in your country.
Brazilian regards Chico
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#153253 - 11/16/01 10:34 AM
Re: Advice, buying arranger
|
Senior Member
Registered: 06/25/99
Posts: 16735
Loc: Benton, LA, USA
|
Hi TGALF, I had a PA80 for a couple of months. Now have a PSR2000. Must say up front I am slightly prejudiced for Yamaha because they are so much easier to play in real time. Anyway I'll give my opinions of your questions, for what they are worth. (FREE)
1. Sound Quality- Is Korg really the first mid priced Arranger that is built on a professional sound engine? WOuld Yamaha use the PSR sound engine in their professional keyboards? (I know sound is subjective but overall impression is what I am looking for).
Korg sounds are good, but so are Yamaha---very subjective. There are some sounds I prefer on each keyboard.
2. Keyboard Style Versatility- are we stuck with the built in styles; who has better support new styles; which has the better quality styles overall?
Thousands of style for Yamaha are freely available. There are also lots of Korg styles around, but not all work easily in the PA80. Korg styles are generally more involved, longer (up to 12 measures). Yamaha styles are simpler but more versatile. Yamaha has greater selection of fills, intros, endings. If your making your own styles, Korg allows you to build differing patterns according to chord type (for example, minor, major 7 minor7, dim, etc.) Yamaha allows extensive editing, and seems to be a little easier. Again, I'm used to working with Yamaha.
3. Inputs/Vocal effects/Karoake- Does one of these kayboards do an abviously better job when a mic is plugged in? Does the Yamaha have only 1 input? Which has the better Karoake functions?
Yamaha wins the mic question hands down, in my opinion. Has dedicated mic e.q., effects, compressor, noise gate. Only one input, but you can run a line in from a mixer and use as many mics as you want. Korg has two inputs. The harmonizer on the Korg is primitive compared to Yamaha. It sounds good, but there are no options to change harmony types, gender, number of voices--no editing of harmonizer, at least yet. The Korg recognizes .kar files in addition to .mid files. .kar files must be converted to .mid before Yamaha will read them. Korg has an add-on Video Out board available. 2000 doesn't. It is built into 9000 and Pro.
4. Built-in speakers- is one obviusly better than the other or are they both similar in this area?
Both are good. I think 2000's are louder, but this may not be correct.
5. Sequencer- which has the better grade sequencer for importing/exporting and editing reqular sequences?
I didn't really explore either sequencer much, other than to play back. The Korg has two sequencers so you could fade in/fade out songs. Yamaha has Easy Record mode. Just punch a button and start recording. You can later go back and add more tracks. I don't remember if Korg has this feature. Probably does.
The difference in price becomes more apparent if I have to but the vocal/guitar input board for the Korg. What are some of the best prices in the USA?
2000 is around $1100-1200, depending on package. Don't know Korg best price. [/B][/QUOTE]
Other observations: Korg has Joystick Controller, Yamaha has two wheels. I sorta like the Joystick, but am used to the wheels. Yamaha has two foot assignable foot pedals. With Korg, you will definitely need the optional 5-switch pedal. I had trouble finding one locally, and they are rather expensive. Korg main pluses (to my way of using it): Joystick, live drum sounds. Yamaha main pluses: Vocal functions, ease of operation. Good luck with your decision. You really need to spend time with each of them before you decide what's best for you. There are several places that will give return or exchange privileges. DonM
_________________________
DonM
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#153254 - 11/16/01 12:16 PM
Re: Advice, buying arranger
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2195
Loc: Catskill Mountains, NY
|
I agree in many ways with Don's evaluations of the boards, but he and I also both understand that what features are important to one person are less so to another. I think some of what makes certain features important depends too upon what you would primarily use your board for.
You can get a real good feel for what these boards can do on this forum, but I think the last thing that Don said his post is also the most important as well. I also highly recommend that you to listen to and demo both boards for yourself if at all possible, preferably on a day when you have plenty of time to experiment with both. If you are real fortunate, you might live near a guy like George Kaye or Dan O'Neill, someone who not only sells the boards, but actually knows how they work, and is willing to really work with you, but too often this is not the case.
Having said that, I lean a bit toward the Korg overall for sounds and styles, but will generally agree with Don that the Yamaha seems easier to use. ( In fairness though the PA80 has more functions overall, and like Don, I'm more used to Yamaha's O'S in general ). The PA80 is also due for a major O/S update shortly, which promises to add sampling and some other function add ons as well. To answer your 5 priorities more specifically, here goes my opinion for what it's worth. I own both boards and have them sitting here in this room right now.
1. Both have good very samples and sounds. I use guitar sounds a lot and in a composition I can get the PA80s to sound more realistic. The other 2 areas in sound where I think Korg wins is on drums and synth sounds. The rest are a tossup for me, ( both excellent ) although I might even lean slightly toward the Yamaha on saxes and on the acoustic pianos. The "pro" factor really comes in the editability, particularly if you like to modify synth sounds. I think the PA80 has the best synth edit ( sound editing ) capabilities of any major arranger on the market, and is comparable to many "pro" workstations / synths.
2. I always thought that Yamaha styles ( even in the 9000 to an extent ) were a bit canned sounding, but then again I play a good bit of jazz and fusion and almost any styles really limit what I can do in those genres. They would work very well for an entertainer playing live to a crowd. The 2000 styles seem a bit better too, than some of Yamaha's other boards. I like the PA80 styles better overall, but one criticism is only 2 fills per style, although with the new o/s there will be 4, just like the in the 2000. Both pattern sequencers ( for making and changing styles ) are very easy to use for me, and both give good detailed functions.
3. I'm not generally a singer per se, and don't use the vocal functions that often, so I'll defer to what Don and others have said, meaning that overall I think they prefer the 2000.
4. Both are good as Don says. I think he might be right too, the 2000's seem a bit louder, but both produce excellent sounds. Both boards still sound pretty much the same when I put them through studio monitors or record them, which tells me that the built in speakers offer an excellent accounting to the true sounds that the boards are putting out.
5. Both have very good sequencers for arranger boards, although Korg's will not have editing down to note level until the new O/S comes out. Still, for me, neither will replace my software sequencers. Editing with a mouse and a dedicated sequencer is always quicker and easier for me, but for the first time, I'd have to say I have 2 boards that I can do very useful sequencer work on without having to be hooked up to a computer.
Final thoughts:
No doubt the PSR2000 is an excellent value for its price. Both boards sound good and I'm not willing to part with either. For me, if I want a board that is closer to a pro workstation / synth in features and functions, then the PA80 is it hands down, but at a savings of several hundred dollars, for home use, use as a solo performer, and ease of use in general, you can't go wrong with the 2000 either. I much prefer the joystick over the pitch wheel too. I have had to replace pitch wheels over the years in different boards because I play them pretty hard, but I've never had a problem with the j/s on my Korg M1 after years of use and abuse.
Good Luck,
AJ
_________________________
AJ
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|