|
|
|
|
|
|
#159226 - 04/21/06 08:47 PM
Ketron SD5 Review
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/01/02
Posts: 1790
Loc: Medina, OH, USA
|
I recently had the pleasure of joining up with AJ and some other nice folks at his Jacksonville Ketron workshop. On display was the Midjay, EXP SD1, and the new SD5. It was a very enjoyable, entertaining, and educational afternoon. I give my highest recommendation to attend one of AJ's workshops, should you have the opportunity... you will learn much and have a good time.
The SD5 keyboard is 61 keys, velocity sensitive with 6 vel curves and aftertouch. It utilizes a pitch and modulation joystick. The layout is similar to the SD1, with the most noticable difference being the inclusion of onboard speakers, which are very good sounding.
290 orchestral preset sounds, > 1000 percussive sounds, 32 part multitimbral, 110 user voices, 10 digital drawbar effects 120 programs, 4 voices, 4 splits, sustain, port, vel switch, several program modes, 292 second voices, 24 new drum sets, drum mixer, manual drums, 62 live drum sets. The arranger includes new Real Latin, Unplugged (emphasis on guitars and bass, no drums), and Ballroom.
New features include Riff, Arranger Mute, After Fill, Smart 7th, Alternative Bass, Swing Bass, and Professional Guitar templates.
The SD5 does not have a sequencer, but will record real time (one take) to disc (HD or FD) and will play SMFs with karaoke and Txt files, converts .kar & Midi type 0 files to 1. Jukebox, Intelligent transposer, song chain, drum & bass, lead on/off, and drum remix.
Options include video interface, vocalizer, hard disc, pattern expansion, and footswitch. Size and weight are ~ same as SD1, 46" long and 37 lbs.
Some of the features I was especially impressed with... velocity affects not only loudness, but also the timbre of many of the voices. This is due to not only sampling but also modulation in the creation of these voices. New sound card, 128 polyphony. Organs and guitars are totally new and more realistic, with the guitars now rivaling the best of Yammy, IMO... and the organs more B3ish. Bass voices all new.
Many buttons (> 100), which are now better organized and leaving nothing important buried in a submenu.
After Fill... a new feature that is easy to explain. With AF engaged, you can assign a fill (drum fill) to the keyboard aftertouch, therefore your hands not leaving the KB! Way cool!
Riff... a new feature, which is also very cool, but not so easy to explain. I'll give it my best shot.
Riff allows the KB to learn from you, from how you are playing (most importantly, your chord progressions) and the style you are playing. Then, when you stop playing, the KB will continue with that same progression. This allows you to use both hands to play lead (eg piano), or to do whatever you'd like with your left hand..... like keep it on the joystick if you are playing guitar or saxaphone (imo, how can you play a realistic sounding sax or blues guitar without keeping your left hand on the stick or wheels).
The most simple example I can think of... "Evil Ways". If you start with Gm7 and C7 and then kick in Riff, it'll keep those two chords going until the cows come home, or until you turn off Riff. However, Riff can learn a pattern/chord progression... and apply it... up to 32 measures! That can be whole song!
Got that so far? OK, now it gets more complicated. Riff is not simply a loop playing over and over. On the contrary, it makes the progression with little redundancy, therefore sounding more realistic, as would a real live band playing. Also, as you continue to play melody, Riff will become progressively more complex, adding more sounds or voices, with each repeated progression. However, it will also "get out of the way" (tone back a little) when you are playing, so as to not compete with your lead, or melody. Make sense? Hope so... the feature sounds really good.
The final production SD5 will have 2 Riff modes. One mode will lock in, therefore the same riff will sound, with predictability. The other will be the learning, or random mode (more unpredictable, like real guys in a real band).
AMSP? Nothing announced yet, but from inuendos I'm picking up, with vocalizer and HD probably close to 3K.
I really liked the SD5. The only 2 downers for me personally... no second mic input, but that's minor... and only 61 keys, not so minor. Some of the new features enable you to make more music with less button pushing, allowing you to better relate with and enjoy your audience. That's important to me. Combined with some really great sounds, the SD5 is a winner... and one I'd like to own.
Glenn
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#159237 - 04/25/06 06:20 AM
Re: Ketron SD5 Review
|
Member
Registered: 12/03/99
Posts: 732
Loc: Phoenix, AZ USA
|
Guys, no adding the sequencer would not add the weight. But it would make it harder for the customers to justify buying the SD1. The same can be said about the sampler, and probably about the 76 keys as well (the SD5 appears to be as long as the SD1).
If you remember AJ's posts before the release of SD5, it seemed like Ketron was intending to repackage their technologies (and make some improvements) and make a low-cost instrument. I think even the professional OMB entertainers would find having a playback-only sequencer a sufficient compromise.
My concern is that at $3000 MSRP (without a vocal processor), the SD5 is NOT a low-cost instrument by any means. I believe that the PSR3000 sets the price point for the "low-cost professional instrument", at about $1500 street. Korg PA50 and Roland are close to that - actually closer to PSR1500 (without vocal harmony).
As far as the new features go - having the 16 extra buttons is nice, but their placement, where they can only be accessed by the left hand, is questionable - they should be right in the middle. I guess the Riff functions are interesting, but they are relatively smal software enhancements, and if they are really that useful, I would guess that every SD1 owner should demand a software update, which will include them.
I am going to reserve my judgement as to whether the SD5 is worth its asking price until I get to see/hear/play it. However, at first glance this is not a low-cost offering that many manufacturers produce when repackaging their 4-year old technologies and producing a dumbed-down "middle of the line" instrument.
_________________________
Regards, Alex
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#159242 - 04/26/06 06:30 AM
Re: Ketron SD5 Review
|
Member
Registered: 12/03/99
Posts: 732
Loc: Phoenix, AZ USA
|
Spalding,
look for AJ's posts from about 8-12 months ago: he was actually asking members on this forum what would be a good compromise set of features for a lower-end arranger, and then he announced the SD5. Although it is mainly a repackaging of the selected SD1 technologies, it also has some new features and larger polyphony. Overall, I think this was a good attempt to produce a mid-level arranger (though my concern about price still stands).
Indeed, SD1 is a fairly old instrument (by today's standards), having been around for 4(?) years. However, Ketron has been pretty good issuing software updates which significantly improved the instrument over previous versions; they have even updated the sound set. Many times I have seen the manufacturers advertise instrument as being software upgradeable, but then these software upgrades are just bug fixes of the things that should have been working from the start. So in effect, this is just a way to turn the user into a beta-tester. While initial SD1 patches were all correcting bugs, some of which were fairly serious stability problems, the later software updates went beyond that. I wish Roland had done that with my G1000.
As far as completeness of the instrument goes - we all have different needs, and yours may well be different from mine. I need high polyphony and abhor heavy weight of the likes of latest Rolands and Korgs. Playing mostly live, I don't care about recording with the sequencer. Whenever I need to do a multi-track recording (which is very rarely), I am at home near a computer, where even a $60 PowerTracks provides loads more functionality than any built-in sequencer. I can see how someone else may want an all=in-one instrument, and don't care about the weight. This is why it is great that there is more than one model of an arranger on the market, and we have the freedom to choose, instead of being confined to a single one. Regards, Alex
_________________________
Regards, Alex
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#159247 - 04/26/06 10:57 AM
Re: Ketron SD5 Review
|
Member
Registered: 12/03/99
Posts: 732
Loc: Phoenix, AZ USA
|
Originally posted by spalding: ...Just makes no business sense to omit it. It having one would enable just 2 additional purchases of the isntrument , wouldnt that justify having one ? Would the inclusion of a sequencer have turned people off the SD5 or increased the sales of the SD1 ? I mean how hard could it have been to implement the existing SD1 sequencer into the SD5 ? Spalding, You are preaching to the converted (in a manner of speaking). I too would like a full-featured instrument (with vocal harmony, 16 track sequencer, a 100 GB hard disk, MP3 record/playback capability, etc), with 128 note polyphony, built in speakers, and light weight (30 lbs) sold for cheap ($1000). Only I also want 76 keys on it. We are both out of luck - this is not likely to happen. Even if manufacturers could build a keyboard like that for $1000, they are not going to sell it for that if they can charge more. Hence, we either have to get a top-of-the line keyboard (and pay accordingly), or compromise. Finding it cumbersome to carry my 40 lb G1000, I don't want to get a 50 lb monstrosity, be it a Korg or a Roland. If someone wants to combine their gig with weight-training, the heavy weight will not be a deterrent to them. My problem is that there is no keyboard for any money that combines the requirements I listed as important to me, but that is a different story. Getting back to your "makes no business sense" phrase - it may not make sense, but it is being done all the time. Remember Intel 486SX chip? - it was manufactured exactly the same as the regular 486 (DX), but then Intel would actually expend some effort to DISABLE the floating point processor already on the chip, so that they could have a lower-price, lower functionality offering which would not directly compete with their high-end product. I guess, Ketron decided to force you to choose between the sD5 and SD1, which, in addition to a full sequencer, also gives you a longer keyboard, sampling, built-in vocalizer, and hard disk. Regards, Alex
_________________________
Regards, Alex
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#159249 - 04/28/06 06:04 PM
Re: Ketron SD5 Review
|
Member
Registered: 12/03/99
Posts: 732
Loc: Phoenix, AZ USA
|
I can not dispense advice regarding Ketron products, as I do not own one. I do know that their styles sound very engaging, though I think that after a while you may start wishing for less busy styles.
As far as navigation goes - IMO Ketron's system is a bit different from most other ones, and on several occasions that I had tried Ketron products, I felt a bit confused by their teminology (and I am not a technically illiterate person), and some of the details of their OS.
The only suggestion I can give you is - make sure you try the product you are considering, before paying money for it. This is especially the case with Ketron. If there is no dealer in your area, perhaps you can arrange with Ketron (or AJ) to buy an instrument with a 30-day return.
Regards, Alex
_________________________
Regards, Alex
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#159251 - 04/30/06 07:46 PM
Re: Ketron SD5 Review
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/22/02
Posts: 6020
Loc: NSW,Australia
|
Hi Alex, I have to agree with you. Some of the terminology is confusing. I'm used to calling styles : " Styles " not patterns. Intro's/endings, variations fills, "Style Parts" not " Sections " Drums, bass , guitar, phrases "Tracks" not " Parts" I read the SD1+ manual about 3 times before it really started to sink in. It is poorly written. There's no drum maps. I think some of the owners don't realize all the drums available to them (and the drums are an awesome feature of the keyboard.) Don't think I've come across anyone yet who's used the "audio loop" function in a style. It's pretty amazing when you can sync an audio drum loop in a style. It's a pity when a poorly written manual lets a great keyboard down. Spending the time learning the functions I wanted, was well worth it. best wishes Rikki http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/makingstyles/ [QUOTE]Originally posted by Alex K: [B] As far as navigation goes - IMO Ketron's system is a bit different from most other ones, and on several occasions that I had tried Ketron products, I felt a bit confused by their teminology (and I am not a technically illiterate person), and some of the details of their OS.
_________________________
best wishes Rikki 🧸
Korg PA5X 88 note SX900 Band in a Box 2022
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#159252 - 06/07/06 03:48 PM
Re: Ketron SD5 Review
|
Moderator
Registered: 03/21/01
Posts: 3600
Loc: Middletown, DE
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|