|
|
|
|
|
|
#164941 - 04/17/03 11:22 PM
KP-100S Motion Sound: 'all in one unit' Stereo PA received today !
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/01/99
Posts: 10427
Loc: San Francisco Bay Area, CA, US...
|
UPS just delivered to me today, a Motion Sound: KP-100S 'all in one unit' stereo PA, which I had pre-ordered from our synthzone forum buddy & music dealer, Dan O'Neil a few weeks back: http://motion-sound.com/keypro_amplifiers.htm I was immediately impressed by the KP-100S's build quality, compact size, and relative light weight (38 lbs). I immediately hooked it up to my Tyros and was quite impressed by its sound, especially the bass, considering it has only 8" woofers. The 50 watts RMS/channel one unit design may prove to be the perfect small-medium sized gig 'stereo' solution, as it preserves the impressive stereo efx sound that so many keyboard sounds now rely on (ei: Yamaha's 'Live Grand'), of which becomes severely degraded (via phase cancellation) when played thru a mono system. I experimented briefly with the KP-100S's stereo enhancer feature and was quite impressed with the surround sound feel it provides. It's all a matter of taste but it's important to note not to set the enhancer level too high if you want to achieve a natural stereo sound. The amp also includes 3 band EQ and mic (both XLR & 1/4") mic inputs. The mic inputs are not important for me though because I typically send my vocals thru the Tyros vocalizer. KP-100S line inputs include two sets of 1/4" unbalanced stereo pairs. The KP-100S also includes a pair of (XLR) lineouts and a 1/4" output for connecting to a subwoofer unit. The KP-100S manual suggests placing the PA unit 'behind' you at about 2 feet above the floor, with your position at amplifer center for best expander stereo effect. It also adds, that placing the amplifier on the floor can provide more bass, but depending on how close you are to the KP-100S, you may not hear enough treble. Tilting the KP-100S back slightly can help direct more 'highs' toward you. In my initial tests, I had no problems hearing the highs and the bass was relatively decent, and if used in conjunction with the Tyros' subwoofer, the bass response was even MORE impressive. The thing I find most odd when utilizing the KP-100S alone w/o the Tyros speakers, is having the sound coming solely from behind me. Only time will tell if I'll be able to adjust to this or if I'll need to utilize the Tyros onboard speakers as well. I'm now searching for a suitable small tilt stand for the KP-100S, similar to the one 'the PRO' is using for his larger KP-200S setup, which will raise & tilt the KP-100S a couple of feet off the floor. I'd appreciate any suggestions. I may also consider ordering a custom KP-100S cover made by 'Le Cover': http://www.lecover.com/ LeCover offers both a non-padded or padded version. I'm curious if the padded cover is worth the extra expense or not. Recommendations? I'm interested in hearing feedback from other new Motion Sound KP-100S owners. Beakybird (Larry Levine): Realizing that you ordered your KP-100S about the same time I ordered mine, I assume you got yours now too, so curious to hear what you think of it. OK, I'll be posting more feedback in a few days, after taking this new baby for a test drive 'out on the road'. - Scott
_________________________
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#164945 - 04/18/03 07:09 AM
Re: KP-100S Motion Sound: 'all in one unit' Stereo PA received today !
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/08/02
Posts: 15576
Loc: Forest Hill, MD USA
|
Scott, What size room or audience do you believe the 100 is capable of handling? I would sure like to lighten the load for some of the smaller jobs I do on a regular basis--senior centers, retirement communities, private parties in homes, jobs that does not require huge speakers and 600 watts of power. Additionally, does the 100 have a pole-stand mounting bracket in the bottom, or must it be placed on a tilted stand? And finally, if this is not too personel, how much did it cost? The website made no mention of suggested list price.
Thanks,
Gary
_________________________
PSR-S950, TC Helicon Harmony-M, Digitech VR, Samson Q7, Sennheiser E855, Custom Console, and lots of other silly stuff!
K+E=W (Knowledge Plus Experience = Wisdom.)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#164950 - 04/18/03 12:18 PM
Re: KP-100S Motion Sound: 'all in one unit' Stereo PA received today !
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/01/99
Posts: 10427
Loc: San Francisco Bay Area, CA, US...
|
Originally posted by Beakybird: Scott, doesn't the amp has handles on the side, doesn't it? Unfortunately, the KP-100S doesn't include side handles like the KP-200S does. The KP-100S is considerably lighter though (38 vs 55 lbs) , so lack of side handles isn't as critical, but it would have been nice none the less. Btw: The "Motion Sound" KP-100S's small footprint size fits perfectly on the bed of my "Superlite" Handtruck: assuring maximum support & stability for quick ez transport along with the rest of the gear stacked on top: http://www.pstco.com/superlite_cobra.htm Originally posted by the Pro:
Since you sing a lot and I don't, perhaps you'll get a chance to address some of the questions others had about using the KP from behind you, ie: feedback problems. In initial tests, I've had no vocal feedback problems with the amp positioned behind me, as my body appears to block the mic from pointing directly at the PA unit. I'll report back more after taking it on my small job later today. Originally posted by Trtjazz:
Scott what I would suggest on your vocals, is run through the Tyros but in line out, send them out the sub 1 & 2 into the second channel of your KP. That way it will all be in the same mix source and you can take advantage of the stereo field for them too. Currently when performing live, I send both vocals & keyboard sounds out to the Motion Sound PA solely via the Tyros main output (L/L+R). I'm confused about how sending the vocals separately (via the Tyros sub1 &2 outs) to the 2nd input channel on the KP-100S will offer any advantages. The KP-100S provides 3 band overall EQ as well as a stereo enhancer, but it doesn't allow you apply these separately to only one of the two stereo inputs. Can you please provide more details on the advantage of sending out the vocals to the KP-100S separately? Curious how other Motion Sound users (KP-200S/KP-100S) configure vocals & keyboard with their Motion Sound units. Originally posted by travlin'easy: Scott, What size room or audience do you believe the 100 is capable of handling? . . . Additionally, does the 100 have a pole-stand mounting bracket in the bottom, or must it be placed on a tilted stand? And finally, if this is not too personel, how much did it cost? The website made no mention of suggested list price.Gary Gary: Though I haven't tried it out on the job yet, I expect it should handle the smaller acoustic jazz/pop lounge venues (up to 50 people) where heavy duty pumping bass isn't required, but I'll have to report back after taking it on a few gigs. The 100 doesn't include a pole stand mounting bracket on the bottom.The suggested list price for the KP-100S is $699. I got mine from DanO and his price is even a much better deal than the $599 price offered at Music 123.com. I was lucky enough to have mine drop shipped directly to my door from Motion Sound. Originally posted by The Accordionist: I purchased the Quik Lok BS-317 amplifier stand and it functions well. You may be able to get by with the smaller Quik Lok stand, however, since the KP-100S is only 35 pounds Anyone know the QuikLok model number of the recommended 'smaller' Quik Lok stand? Originally posted by The Accordionist:
I can't recommend LeCover enough. I have the regular, non-padded cover and it serves it's purpose well. I didn't opt for the 1/2" padded cover because it was more important to me that the cover be manageable and easy to stow away in my accordion case during a gig. The covers fit like a glove. I hope that when you say it 'fits like a glove' that it's not so snug that it's difficult to install or remove quickly & easily. The EV brand covers I purchased for my EV SxA100's are very awkward (time consuming) to install and remove because the fit is too snug and requires lifting the speakers and then struggling to fit them into the cover. I hope the Le Cover bags are designed better. Thanks for your good suggestion about going with the non-padded cover vs padded version, but I'm wondering if going the padded vs padded route might offer (because of padded rigidity?) easier cover installation/removal? Originally posted by The Accordionist:
I've been experimenting a lot with the KP-200S and have just now found the sweet spot to my ears. RJ Miller of this forum has been very helpful with suggestions via email on how he has set up his KP-200S. Can you possibly post here (or email me privately) RJ Miller's suggestions? Thanks to everyone for there input and replies. In the meantime, I'll keep you all posted on my progress with the KP-100S. Scott
_________________________
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#164953 - 04/19/03 12:26 AM
Re: KP-100S Motion Sound: 'all in one unit' Stereo PA received today !
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/01/99
Posts: 10427
Loc: San Francisco Bay Area, CA, US...
|
RJ: Many thanks for your input. I look forward to trying your Motion Sound setup suggestion out. - Scott Originally posted by trtjazz: Scott by sending them out seperately and into the 2nd channel of the KP you will have independant control over the vocals in the mix. Terry: I don't know about the Motion Sound KP-200S, but the KP-100S' EQ/mixer section does NOT support 'independent' mixer control over its 2 stereo input channels, but instead controls BOTH input channels (vocals & keyboard) together. However, with my current setup with both vocals & keyboard sound going out together via the Tyros' main stereo output channel (L/L+R), I'm still easily able to independently control the vocal mix from the Tyros itself, so don't see any advantage to sending the vocals & keyboard sounds out separately from the Tyros to my KP-100S PA unit. Perhaps the KP-200S is different than the KP-100S, allowing you to apply independent mixer control (eq, balance, etc) over each of its input channels, and that may explain Terry's reasoning. If I'm still missing something here, I hope that Terry (or someone else here) can provide more insight. Many thanks. - Scott
_________________________
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|