|
|
|
|
|
|
#168800 - 11/08/07 06:39 AM
How can manufacturers make Arranger KB's EASIER to Operate in Your opinion?
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/00
Posts: 43703
|
Sliders, OS, Buttons, Touch screens, non in-depth multi page menu functions, Lots of on the Fly parameter changes, MULTI-tasking Modes, style,smf,mp3 all at the same time,plugins, bigger non glare displays.....etc etc ......
and there are so many more....what about yours?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#168801 - 11/08/07 06:46 AM
Re: How can manufacturers make Arranger KB's EASIER to Operate in Your opinion?
|
Senior Member
Registered: 04/13/05
Posts: 5126
Loc: USA
|
Originally posted by Dnj: Sliders, OS, Buttons, Touch screens, non in-depth multi page menu functions, Lots of on the Fly parameter changes, MULTI-tasking Modes, style,smf,mp3 all at the same time,plugins, bigger non glare displays.....etc etc ......
and there are so many more....what about yours? Touch screens, sliders and Songbook features as already seen on the PA800 and PA2xPro
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#168809 - 11/08/07 03:13 PM
Re: How can manufacturers make Arranger KB's EASIER to Operate in Your opinion?
|
Senior Member
Registered: 07/21/05
Posts: 5386
Loc: English Riviera, UK
|
Originally posted by mr9000: One thing i'm increasing wanting is a "lock" feature,where i could freeze single voices while changes others.. AND a Operating system where you can go into the 'custom voice' area that WOULD allow any R2, R3 Left voice not having to be in the R1-position feature for R1/R2/R3 & left! After getting a voice sounding real great,say in the R2 spot,i have spent so much time copy entire voice setup into R1,,not good time wise. I could go on and on on this topic. Just select the layer R1, R2, L1 etc that you wish to change and the rest of the voices (Layers) will stay the same. When you have edited a voice, just save it in a user sound slot, (Normally a couple of button presses) and you can then use it anywhere you like. (That way you don’t have to keep modifying it every time you want to load it into another layer) Or am I missing something? Bill
_________________________
English Riviera: Live entertainment, Real Ale, Great Scenery, Great Beaches, why would anyone want to live anywhere else (I�m definitely staying put).
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#168813 - 11/09/07 12:19 PM
Re: How can manufacturers make Arranger KB's EASIER to Operate in Your opinion?
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14266
Loc: NW Florida
|
I think the main thing that all arranger manufacturers can do to make them easier to operate is to ensure that the registration data memorizes the COMPLETE state of the instrument. No more 'this data is stored here', 'that data is stored there', and 'the MIDI setup is stored here'...
If you want to go from one registration using internal sounds to a reg. that uses a few external modules (where most arrangers will make you change MIDI configurations), or change chord recognition modes mid song, or just about anything that currently involves at least two separate load functions, it should ALL be one button.
ONE registration to bind them all...
And another thing...? Make sure that changing from ANY registration to any other registration is completely seamless. No voices get cut off, no glitches in the sound while parameters change, no hiccups in timing, no nothing. You should be able to change EVERYTHING on the fly without the slightest loss of flow.
Lastly... FAR more comprehensive 'HOLD' functions. You should be able to put a HOLD on just about anything, from Tones to Split points, to recognition modes, to tempi, and not have OTS over-ride or new registration change your 'held' parameters. Most arrangers can hold SOME parameters, but none (AFAIK) give you a comprehensive set. Everyone uses an arranger differently, expecting one limited set to cover ALL the possibilities is unrealistic.
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|