Registered: 05/26/99
Posts: 9673
Loc: Levittown, Pa, USA
You will pay more for that Roland model...but on the surface the E-09 looks better on paper..One thing that stands out..Roland 64 polyphony and Yamaha 32..I have had too many problems with PSR models with only 32 voice polyphony...No hands on experience of the two models...but I would go with the E-09..
Registered: 01/02/04
Posts: 7305
Loc: Lexington, Ky, USA
Got the E-09 recently from George Kaye. Plugged it in and played it for 5 minutes. I'll put another 1/2 hour or so on it and let you know. Already know I like it more than a Yamaha.
thank you for the replies. I only wanna know if there is a great difference between the quality instruments from the two arrangers. I like the E403 for the controls and the arpeggiator. Poly is not a problem for me
Big difference between a GW-7 and an E-09. I have not played the Yamaha in question, so I cannot speak to it. But, the E-09 is not worth $500 IMHO. I bought a new one on ebay. The keys are small and light. The sounds are very good and the rhythms are not bad. My complaint is mostly with the fact that sounds and rhythms are accessible numerically and only one item onscreen at a time. That means you must either have a list on hand or know the sound or rhythm - way too much trouble if playing at the same time. If you've ever played a more advanced arranger, you will not be satisfied with the E-09. If this is your first foray into the arranger market, you'll like the sounds and rhythms. My suggestion is to spend an extra $100 and get a used PSR 2000, 2100 or 3000. Look for a good deal on one of these and you'll be much happier and won't be looking to upgrade in three months. Good luck.
_________________________
Riding on the Avenue of Time cassp50@gmail.com