Hi,
keybplayer, roel: the VST plugins are for windows but thanks to Linux's magic you can run windows VST apps and reroute the audio and midi ports to native linux ports.
With the added benefits of the greater stability and real time performance Linux offers over Windows.
Since the VST plugins are written for the x86 (intel/amd etc) CPU they will run at full speed under Linux, it's just about rerouting audio/midi and GUI calls to the linux APIs.
(plugzilla and muse research receptor use similar methods but for the average customer it's not apparent that their run linux inside).
The B4 sounds just as it sounds, bit for bit exactly as on Windows.
Regarding the soundcapabilities of the mediastation you have to see the system as a whole.
Dream DSPs are good but DSP technology alone is not going to be the solution for all audio needs of keyboarders. (Because any DSPs are not as flexible as modern CPUs with lots of RAM)
This is why the Mediastation offers choice: Dream DSPs (with up to 256MB samples) + Gigabyte samples streamed directly from disk (for getting faithful reproduction of natural instruments), additive/subtractive synthesizer, VST plugin hosting and more technologies will be added over time (through free, one-keypress internet updates).
roel you wrote "Show us ... how does it sound without NI or other softsynths. (softsynths are everywhere and NOT new at all)".
This sentence does not make sense when refering to the Mediastation because you have to look at the Mediastation as a whole and not only the DSP part.
The DSPs are comparable to other keyboards DSPs (Ketron and others use Dream DSPs too) but as said above cannot compete with the flexibility of modern 3GHz CPUs with hundreds of MBs of RAM.
The Mediastation tries to get out the maximum of each technology by combining and integrating them in an easy to use hardware.
If you want to save then then a low cost PC + softsynths is still the cheapest solution to make music but strangely enough musicians still buy lots of keyboards.
There is certainly a revolution going on about how music is made but musicians still need hardware to interact, an alphanumerical keyboard and a mouse are not the right interface to musicians, especially those that are not too PC-savy. They need buttons, faders, knobs, and at max a touchscreen.
On the other hand traditional MIDI keyboards that are engineered using the usual embedded design and custom chips/DSP cannot compete with the innovation rate that the PC sector is experiencing.
The Mediastation's goal is combine the best of both worlds.
Of course there is still some scepticism since we are following a new approach/philosopy and we are in some sense rewriting the rules how keyboards are built.
Those that stated the earth was not flat were hanged and burned too :-)
Anyway my personal opinion is:
- embedded design is going at much slower pace than PC technology, this keeps prices high and performance/features/flexibility low
- traditional keyboard makers have invested heavily in their legacy embedded technology and don't want to risk venturing in new territories since the old "warmed-up soup" still sells well and probably a new line of PC based keyboards would destroy the value of their legacy stuff.
Probably over time, PC-based MIDI keyboards will not need DSPs inside anymore so that MIDI sound generation can be done entirely in software driving the price of the keyboard even lower.
But for now Lionstracs has decided it's not fleasible yet to go without DSPs.
Not to mention the whole opensource philosophy.
Keyboard makers are usally extremely secretive because they fear the competition.
We take a different approach, the same that made Linux so successful: sharing as much technology we can with others to spur innovation, drive down prices and increase the quality of audio software.
Of course someone can/will be able to copy parts of our software. That's permitted by the license as long as they release all modifications (see GNU GPL license).
In this times of globalization the only chance to survive is to stay ahead of the competition by constantly innovating.
The times you developed a product and then sold the same overpriced legacy stuff for decades are fading, everyone knows that but no one admits it publicy.
As for audio demos, don't worry more stuff will follow, for now the Musikmesse is using up all the resources.
I hope at least a couple of SZ users can come to our booth at Musikmesse so that they can report here what they saw and heard in an unbiased manner.
Here are a few liturgical organ demos which are provided by an opensource organ engine which runs on the Mediastation and the upcoming organ:
(to play .ogg files on Windows you need winamp or other playes since the mediaplayer does not play them without installing additional codecs)
http://users.skynet.be/solaris/linuxaudio/downloads/564-adagio.ogg http://users.skynet.be/solaris/linuxaudio/downloads/triosonata.ogg http://users.skynet.be/solaris/linuxaudio/downloads/prelude-C.ogg To ansver roel's question about the Lionstracs made organ (but it will be sold under the organ's company name): it's based essentially on the same technology so both instruments will provide similar features.
That way you can choose between 1 manual mediastation, 2 manual mediastation, 2 manual organ with pedals, speakers, amp builtin.
cheers,
Benno