Registered: 05/26/99
Posts: 9673
Loc: Levittown, Pa, USA
Rolandfan , I checked the manual and cannot find that to be a fact,,,I cannot believe Yamaha would use that kind of rom memory in a home keyboard when they do not use it in their flagship workststions..besides the Tyros sounds too thin to be.. If you find it in the manual, tell me where?
Registered: 09/22/05
Posts: 256
Loc: Hilton Head, SC, USA
In many ways I think we've been stroked by manufacturers to think that 185 or even 300 MB of WAVE ROM is a lot. I've been working with Colossus, which is a 32 GB (not MB) sound library. The sound difference between Colossus and my Motif ES 8, which has what Yamaha calls "a whopping 185 MB of WAV ROM", is a no-brainer - Colossus sounds much better in every way. And the way Colossus works is simple: the attack of the sample is loaded into RAM for on-demand playing while the rest of the sample plays direct-from-disk off a hard drive. Colossus is now available on the Muse Receptor for live use without a computer. I think companies like Y/R/K could make keyboard workstations that delivered GB's of WAV ROM in the same manner if they wanted to, but as long as they can sell their comparitively limited hardware at high prices then they have no incentive to do it.
[This message has been edited by Esh (edited 10-04-2005).]
Fran when Yamaha introduced Tyros 1 almost every advertisement mentioned 96 mb....This time the adverts didnt say anything....and if its not in the manual then I dont know why someone said it was 300mb... Yamaha always mentions the mb amount.....lol not this time
Unfortunately some folks think it is more effective and fun to immaturely shine a bright offensive light directly into someone's face and embarass them in order to make their self-rightous point for everyone else to see, rather than to let their inward light exude a gentle glow to which people are attracted. Maybe there's just not much inside to start with. MT7:5
Going back to the topic, I think that the sheer quantity of ROM does not mean anything; what matters is the "quality" of the sounds. Kurzweil succeeded in packing one of the most used digital pianos (by professional players) in just 12 Mb.
_________________________
Korg Kronos 61 and PA3X-Pro76, Roland G-70, BK7-m and Integra 7, Casio PX-5S, Fender Stratocaster with Fralin pickups, Fender Stratocaster with Kinman pickups, vintage Gibson SG standard.
stop this nonsense ! i also found the word offensive but did not comment. I am sure it wasnt meant to offend and i am sure that most here would not deliberatly try to offend others sensibilities. Lets just let it stop here. Now we know some people are ofended by certain words lets not use them unless we have to. Its really that simple
The size of the wave is one variable which determines the overall quality of the virtual acoustic instrument. All things being equal, the larger the sample the better the instrument emulates the real thing. As you know serious composers or screen writers either use the real instrument or those (virtual instruments) in the GB range. They usually do not use, e.g., pianos found in workstations or arranger keyboards but rather something like Bardstown's Bosendorfer 290, etc.
I am certain for live performances most virtual instruments found in workstations or arrangers are sufficient
[This message has been edited by Frank L. Rosenthal (edited 10-06-2005).]