|
|
|
|
|
|
#185359 - 10/01/02 11:15 AM
Re: JBL Eon vs. EV sx- series
|
Member
Registered: 10/05/01
Posts: 299
Loc: Providence, RI USA
|
Originally posted by Scottyee: I prefer going the active monitor route for one piece gigging convenience. The EV SxA100's are 43 lbs ea but include a built amp, hi/lo EQ, and 2 inputs (XLR & 1/4'). I auditioned the SxA100s with the JBL Eons (side by side) and chose the EVs because I prefered their easier to carry ergonomic shape and size. I found the Eons slippery and more difficult (un-even weight distrubution) to carry. Angelo, both the Eons & EVs are good choices, but you really need to audition them side by side yourself. I recommend you burn a few of 'your own' recorded songs onto a CD and then taking the CD to a music store to perform a side by side comparison (on the JBL's, EV's, as well as on other PA speakers) to determine which speakers bring out the best for YOUR type/style and taste in music. It's important to remember that sound is a VERY subjective thing. I also suggest (if weight/size is an issue) that you pick up and move each speaker to find out for yourself just how easy they are to lift & carry. Good luck. - Scott Scott, Thanks for your input. As you may know, I do mostly ballads. How's the 12' vs. 15' as far as low end freq? Although it's mostly slow dance material I do, I'd like a little kick to it.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#185364 - 10/03/02 02:03 PM
Re: JBL Eon vs. EV sx- series
|
Member
Registered: 11/09/01
Posts: 217
Loc: Westfield, Massachesetts, USA
|
Angelo, Greetings from western mass...I flew a mission out to No mans land today and overflew your neck of the woods...anyhow, After checking out the same choices you did (I actually narrowed it down to the Mackie 450's and the Ev sx-100's)I went with the EV's because in a side by side test (cd's, keyboard etc...cranked real loud, and soft)they were slightly below the 450's in sound, but in weight and price, they were the winners. One thing to note, the mackies are rated at 300 watts for the woofer and 100 for the horn (mid high freqs)..The ev's list as the same, but as dynamic watts. The average rated power is only 150 watts and 80 respectively. The mackies are clear winners here and in sound clarity. I will go with the EV's until I think I need more bang for the buck, then I'll shell out for the Mackies. But my feeling is I'll daisy chain more sx-100's becuase they do sound great with ballds and keyboards / vocals. As a side not, I also picked up the Mackie subwoofer becauser it did blow the ev sub out of the water (IMO) nice and clean. 979.00 though (and 100lbs). best of luck Brian
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#185366 - 10/03/02 06:05 PM
Re: JBL Eon vs. EV sx- series
|
Member
Registered: 11/09/01
Posts: 217
Loc: Westfield, Massachesetts, USA
|
I bought the active speakers because I didn't want to carry amps and such with me...I need a clean set-up..I'm sure guys have great ideas on a sleek amp setup too, but for me, I like the portability, weight and the fact that it's all in one package. I paid $510 a piece through SAM Ash with 15 months interest free/no payments. That way I can work and pay the buggers off without touching my regular income. Shipping was 20 bucks a pop, so you may want to deal with a local guy and if he'll give you a deal, with tax included, you may get them cheaper..it all depends. I'm all for supporting the local guys, but no one wanted to deal with the EV's...I missed the $349 guitar center give away...I called 2 GC's in texas, but they had only 2 left and were holding them...oh well...they're worth every bit of the 510 I paid and more...you'll love e'm...to be honest, the eon G2's were pretty good too..but the EV's caught my ear for some reason...Best of luck...Brian
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|