|
|
|
|
|
|
#190740 - 04/24/06 06:08 AM
Re: Quality virtual instruments for live performance
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2195
Loc: Catskill Mountains, NY
|
Nice collection of virtuals there. I like Chainer as well. it's one excellent host that is stable as a rock.
A local musician friend has Bandstand and my experiences with it were not very good. It took too long to load patches for it ( he has a very fast computer ) to be useful to me, and in the end he and I both agreed that it didn't sound a whole lot better than the freeware SGM180 soundfont that we A/B'd it against, in spite of having approx 10 times as much sample rom.
He just got Hypersonic 2 as well, dongle and all, and I went again to his place to demo it. I liked what I heard. I don't necessarily think the GM patches were superior to Bandstand's, but they loaded much faster. Also, for me, most of the Non GM voices were at least on par with their counterparts in my Motif ES, and in quite a few cases I liked them better.
I like the NI stuff as well. Although I'm tempted to try Arturia's Prophet, my experiences with their Moog and CSV80 emulations leaves me thinking I probably am better off sticking with the Pro 53. The Arturia emulations I mention sound wonderful, but they also suck up a ton of CPU and don't always respond the way they are supposed to inside of some of my hosts.
Absynth totally rocks, and in my mind covers much of the same ground as the Roland V synth, but with more patches that can actually sit well in a mix. B4 is for me better than having the real thing, mainly because it plays so well out of my four and a half pound laptop.
FM7 does the old yamaha DX7 very well, ( you can load the old hardware patch setups into it ) and it also goes beyond it. I'd probably get it if I didn't already have Sytrus, Image Line's FM based soft synth.
In addition to these my favs are : Korg legacy collection including the Wavestation, Polysix, and M1. Finally I have an M1 that works every time I fire it up, unlike my original hardware version. I doubt anyone could ever tell the difference in sound. The Poly six emulation is also dead on ( I had a Polysix as well ). I never had a Wavestation, but man it just rocks in software.
I also like the Plugsound Fretted, drum and keyboard modules.
My favorite analog emulator is still RGC Audio's Pentagon, although Imposocar, which goes after a different sound, is right up there as well.
Some great freewares are out there too: Minimogue VA sounds fat and even has a variable control to let you emulate the oscillator drift that a FReal Mini Moog would produce.
Synth 1 is an absolute killer freebie, based somewhat on a Nord Lead but also capable of sounds you'd likely never get from a Nord.
AJ
_________________________
AJ
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#190742 - 04/24/06 09:31 AM
Re: Quality virtual instruments for live performance
|
Member
Registered: 09/16/02
Posts: 1704
Loc: Toronto
|
Donny, IMO, it definitely will come, keyboards are basically dedicated cpu, with software, ROM, hard drive, monitor, etc.. Just like a real computer. The weakness in the softsynth world at the moment, IMO, is the size of the samples. If they were compressed, or maximized, as is done in hardware keyboards, softsynths would rule. The PSR3000 has a what, 64MB voice ROM. Frank has gigabytes of voices. Hypersonic 2 looks like a step in the right direction.
AJ, Can you elaborate on Hypersonic 2. Is it better then SGM180? What about the Organ emulations? Are there voices on Hypersonic 2 that are usueable as lead voices? The demos I've hear sound relly good as accompaniment. Did you hear the acoustic bass? I think this was a voice that sounded like a super articulated voice!!! Starkeeper
[This message has been edited by Starkeeper (edited 04-24-2006).]
[This message has been edited by Starkeeper (edited 04-24-2006).]
_________________________
I play Roland EM20 and Yamaha PSR550
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#190743 - 04/24/06 01:02 PM
Re: Quality virtual instruments for live performance
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2195
Loc: Catskill Mountains, NY
|
Donny,
If I had the technical ( computer ) skills needed, I'd consider building one myself, with all of the styles and sounds already inside, but with the option of course of adding any DX / VST plugs as well.
I think OMB is already good enough as far as navigation goes. As I said before, I find it just as easy to use as any arranger I've ever owned. The caveat of course is matching the right styles to the right sounds. It's pretty much the equivalent of importing styles from another arranger and trying to make them sound as good as ( or even better than ) your arranger's internal ones. Using all of the sound modules, samples and Vsti's I have, I can get the Korg styles, for example, to sound as good and in some cases better in my soft arranger than they sound on the PA80. This can however, take a lot of work, using several different modules / sample sets, etc, as I've yet to find any all in one soft modules that cover every type of instrument.
What really makes a difference to me are the lead voices though. My PA80 pales in comparison, and even the best Yamaha sounds lag behind for me.. and I happen to like many of Yamaha's lead voices better than their counterpatrts on the PA80.
Starkeeper,
I think SGM180 sounds come close to Hypersonic's GM set.. and I think both are very good. My SGM180 is modified though, so that also makes a difference. I like Hypersonic's GM set as well if not better than Bandstand overall. Mainly I liked that they loaded quickly. What I liked most about Hypersonic was the non GM ( lead ) voices. The basses and drums are excellent, along with many of the acoustic instruments, and there are a multitude of outstanding Digital synth patches and soundscapes. The latter is where HS2 really shines, and I always felt the Motif / Mo ES to be weak in the synth sound areas vs the other of the big 3. I didn't give the organs enough of a test drive though to say how much I like them vs other stuff I have.
Really, I think of HS2 as something like a Motif ES inside a computer, only with better sounds and effects, but also without the arps and sequencer. Then again that's what apps like Sonar, Cubase are for.... or for pattern building FL Studio, Orion, and Energy XT are for....
AJ
[This message has been edited by Bluezplayer (edited 04-24-2006).]
_________________________
AJ
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#190752 - 04/25/06 04:38 PM
Re: Quality virtual instruments for live performance
|
Senior Member
Registered: 05/26/99
Posts: 9673
Loc: Levittown, Pa, USA
|
AJ, Frank, Star...I have decided to purchase BandStand tomorrow..Prepaid order..Do you guys think ..I, as a happy Hyper Canvas user..will be pleased with Band Stand...
I am hoping I can use it in the same manner as Hyper Canvas..Forte host, VanBasco player, to play SMF's...and a real time part[s] live with a keyboard controller..
Pull no punches..Is it a good thing or not worth the upgrade...Since I have not been able to demo at any place[stores], only the MP3 demos/including the SMF to compare my Hyper Canvas...your input is vital...
In my comparison, some things I liked over the Hyper Canvas, and other things[clarity] I did prefer Hyper Canvas..
If this Bandstand is "buggy" ...it will drive me "Buggy"..
BTW, I tried to get the soundfonts up and running without success..
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#190755 - 04/25/06 09:17 PM
Re: Quality virtual instruments for live performance
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2195
Loc: Catskill Mountains, NY
|
I got one for you Fran. Kenneth Rundt's Synthfont. It's freeware. I had downloaded this quite a while back but never really tried it. It's available here: http://www.synthfont.com/ I just dl'd the updated version, set it up, made SGM180 the default Soundfont, and voila, it works like a charm, took less than 5 minutes to get it up and running after downloading. It plays my midifiles from within the program and allows me to load any soundfont I want, or any combination of soundfonts or vsti's. So if you wanted, you could assign B4 for an organ part, SGM180 for the rythym parts, and another Vsti, such as Plugsound's Fretted for the guitars, and then save this as an arrangement so it can be opened the same way next time. I think there is a vst version as well that will allow synthfont to open from within a host sequencer. Kenneth also provides a free software named "Viena", which is very much like the Vienna soundfont editor made available by creative for their Soundblaster sf compatible cards. The main difference is that you don't need a SB card to use Kenneth's version. AJ [This message has been edited by Bluezplayer (edited 04-25-2006).]
_________________________
AJ
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#190756 - 04/25/06 10:08 PM
Re: Quality virtual instruments for live performance
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
|
Originally posted by Frank L. Rosenthal: Fran, Bandstand is not ready for general live performances given it takes to long to load the instruments. This causes significant problems when there are changes in instruments in the middle of a style or midi file. The SGM180 would be a better choice until NI comes up with a smaller wavetable for Bandstand. For lead instruments there are better quality wavetables, e.g., Colossus, GPO, JABB, etc. I think that they should just like Kontakt and gigasampler make Bandstand samples play directly from disk. and so illiminating load times. Next to that Most vst's are only suited for studio and home use because of loading times. But there is a workaround for this problem Fran, if a midi track has instrument changes, set this part of your track as a different new track, most sequencershave more then 16 tracks, adn GM is still only 16 tracks. This will be a problem though if you use OMB styles that have midi instrument changes. Maybe you can make the style change output channel instead of instrument, I am just a starter with OMB though. [This message has been edited by Bachus (edited 04-25-2006).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#190757 - 04/25/06 11:34 PM
Re: Quality virtual instruments for live performance
|
Senior Member
Registered: 08/22/04
Posts: 1457
Loc: Athens, Greece
|
Fran, let me repeat what Frank said. Bandstand takes "ages" (5-20 seconds) to load all instruments when my keyboard sends program changes, and we are talking about drums, bass and 3 other instruments. (Styles in the Casio are 5 tracks). When you try to load a midi file, it takes a lot more. I had to play the midi file, wait till it got to the program changes in the first (empty) measure , pause it, let it load and then continue playing to listen to it. Program changes within the song were even worse. It sounds A LOT more "crisp" than Hypercanvas, especially if you play them head to head. It sounds equal or a little better than KeyRig GM that I think you already have. On the other hand, electric guitars were a lot better in Hypercanvas. Hypersonic 2 sounds as good as Bandstand in GM mode, and in synth mode will amaze you. Don't rush.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#190758 - 04/26/06 12:45 AM
Re: Quality virtual instruments for live performance
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/22/02
Posts: 6021
Loc: NSW,Australia
|
Hi Guys, I'm back, my laptop's up & running. I thought I'd fried it. Hubby's been stuck in bed for the last couple of months, so we weren't able to make the 2 hour trip to sydney to see if it was repairable.
Rang Dell to find out where to take it. The techie had me pulling it apart over the phone, removing battery, pushing buttons, then removing hardrive , then the memory chips. Still looked dead with just an occasional flicker. At the end of it all, I was offered an extension to my warranty & they'd fix it. $1,000AUD for the 1 year extension. I decided no, as for an extra $400 to $500 I'd get a brand new one with 1gig memory ( instead 0f 512mb, dvd burner & double size hardrive.
Anyway with nothing to lose I kept unplugging & swapping round the memory chips. All of a sudden it sprang back to life. So fingers crossed.
Best part is , I've got all my soundfont edits back & backed up this time, so I haven't lost months worth of work.
I'll give it a few more days, ( hopefully still working) and then I'll consider upgrading the memory & try & decide what new softsynths to add to the system.
Keep the suggestions rolling.
best wishes Rikki
_________________________
best wishes Rikki 🧸
Korg PA5X 88 note SX900 Band in a Box 2022
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#190763 - 04/26/06 07:58 AM
Re: Quality virtual instruments for live performance
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2195
Loc: Catskill Mountains, NY
|
I simply unzipped SGM180 into it's own folder in my Vst Plug in folder ( You could use any directory you choose ). Then in Synth Font's file menu, near the bottom it asks for default Font. just go to whereever you placed SGM180 and select it.
Fran, Synth Font is a good app, but I recommend Live Synth Pro over it. It's so straightforward to use, and the SGM180 actually sounds better in it. Why ? because the SGM180 also comes with built in Reverb and Chorus effects that will be activated and adjusted as per the data each particular midi file sends it. All you need to do is check the boxes in LSP for Chorus and Reverb.
Synth Font does not automatically use the included effects in SGM180, although you could add your own Vst effects. LSP is just more straightforward to use. Set it ( pick your Soundfont ) and Forget it.
It has been a long time since I downloaded it, so I'm also not certain whether SGM180 unzips to an SF2 file or a SF ark file. If it is SF2, it should load right up in your SF player, but if it's the latter, then you will need the SF ark extraction tool to get the Soundfont into it's proper state. The tool is available at either SF2Midi.com or Soundfont.it .
AJ
[This message has been edited by Bluezplayer (edited 04-26-2006).]
_________________________
AJ
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#190769 - 04/26/06 04:38 PM
Re: Quality virtual instruments for live performance
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/02
Posts: 5520
Loc: Port Charlotte,FL,USA
|
I know that Frank finds the Banstand too slow for live use at the present time. Has anyone tried Garritan Jazz and Bigband.
I am in the same boat, in that I am looking for a program to go into my Receptor that can handle fast program changes. I am looking at the other programs mentioned, as well.
_________________________
pa4X 76 ,SX900, Audya 76,Yamaha S970 , vArranger, Hammond SK1, Ketron SD40, Centerpoint Space Station, Bose compact
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#190773 - 04/27/06 12:32 AM
Re: Quality virtual instruments for live performance
|
Senior Member
Registered: 08/22/04
Posts: 1457
Loc: Athens, Greece
|
I did an A/B yesterday with Bandstand and Hypersonic2 GM. I loaded both of them on Forte, set HS2 in GM mode, set Midi Yoke as midi output on WinXP Control Panel and playd a midi file on Windows Media Player. Then I simply muted and unmuted the appropriate rack, to switch between them instantaneously, while the midi played. That way I can even have them both play at the same time.
I turned off reverb and chorus effects in both racks after a while.
Note: on 96 KHz, my PC could NOT cope with Bandstand on my attempt to play a busy style or a complex midifile. I had to turn Forte to 48KHz playback to be able to continue without hiccups.
On saxes, clarinets, flutes etc, Banstand wins... It feels more "real life" like, whatever that means. They sound more like instruments on a CD, vibrato and all. HS2 sounds more "keyboard like", much more "simple" sounding.
On the other hand, HS2 sounds like it has the high freqs turned up a little, it is more crisp.
Drums, I couldn't decide, maybe Bandstand has an edge, maybe it is just me.
After turning off the effects, I noticed that Banstand still sounds like it has some sort of Reverb built in the sounds, while HS2 sounds dry.
I have a lot of midis I found on the net over the years, that are specifically made for Roland Sound Canvas, even from Roland itself. These sound a better on HS2.
StarKeeper, Rikki, I still can't figure out how to use Cakewalk to play a midi file and have it sound from within Forte.
[This message has been edited by trident (edited 04-26-2006).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#190774 - 04/27/06 02:42 AM
Re: Quality virtual instruments for live performance
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/02
Posts: 5520
Loc: Port Charlotte,FL,USA
|
Frank Thank you for the info. I set up Colossus the same way, i.e. multi's on several channels. On Receptor, the load time is about 15 seconds for these large samples. Like you say, they are fine for leads.
The Colossus samples, being orchestral, need tweaking of ADSR, and modulation to sound like all around lead instruments. For example, the trumpet might need a shorter attack with delayed vibrato, and a dirtier filter setting. Do you find the other aforementioned products the same in that respect ?
Bernie
_________________________
pa4X 76 ,SX900, Audya 76,Yamaha S970 , vArranger, Hammond SK1, Ketron SD40, Centerpoint Space Station, Bose compact
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|