data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd138/bd138be806dc3036c72bd2457edacc2f38fc79d7" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2d38/b2d38f8c57e991cf12d415332a6471ca796ec558" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd272/bd27242b05f6e7d3016a736ea6d6bf6ac54b1006" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3a3d/f3a3d42336338693357c5a4305ea9aa68399d0a4" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a91d/1a91d13ad5020ab7eed6f0ac09362687b38a8b15" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5530/c553053c5a46f2a2cd045824eedcacf1fef2f8c8" alt="" |
#191493 - 03/03/03 08:14 AM
Re: Is anyone making their own custom Styles?
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2195
Loc: Catskill Mountains, NY
|
Originally posted by KN_Fan: Thanks Don/Blues for your comments.
I should probably be a bit more clear with what I do with Technics composer. Instead of creating your typical 1-2 bar "styles", what I do is record a song (original or not) in chunks. Say..a song is divided into an intro, Verse I, Verse II, and ending. I'd need at least 4 User "pattern" (and I program each to contain anything from 2 bar to 4 or 8 bars each)...and I play the portions of the song real-time. I think Tyros kinda have the same thing (from reading all the posts in this forum), but I don't have the opportunity to try the Tyros here in my area, nobody carries it. PA80's "TOTALLY RE-programmable" 40+ user pattern styles, may have been the answer for me, but I picked the Studio instead cause I was too impressed with the sounds.
Even our fellow Synthzone member, Scott helped me a lot in brainstorming..
At this point I'll have to make the best of my Studio.
KN_Fan KN, I'm sure you'll do fine with the "Studio". I understand the thought of.. " I want this board for this feature but I'd like feature B from Board B too. Workstations are no different from arrangers, in that each has it's particular strengths and things that they do a little ( or a lot ) better than the next one. Both the Motif and Triton Studio are great choices in my mind. Truth be told, the Fantom has some features and a few sounds that I like a lot too. If I only had the money, I'd have 'em all. Better yet, I wish I could combine the best of the three in one board ( yeah right..lol ) What I lack in features that I want in my particular board is often compensated via software. I think what you described above could be more easily accomplished with the help of software ( that is if you don't object to or have a logistical problem with going through your computer ). Have you ever seen the program " The Musical Wizard " ? It is a pattern sequencer that allows for either detailed step recording or real time recording. IT used to cost about 50 bucks or so, ( back when it was the "Drumz Wizard" ), but is now released as freeware as the creators still provide it but no longer support it. It might be a good program for doing what you describe above. The link is: http://www.mclink.it/personal/MC3796/ . If it will help you, that's great, and if not, it costs you nothing. Cheers KN, AJ
_________________________
AJ
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61061/61061327cdead71355b04a35f88f5e7fd734afdc" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff162/ff1629f98bf4ae627e659c3bc432a358a32de046" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58f78/58f78c92db255ba25a8046646ae02cbd64292a0a" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ebeb/7ebeb8ca63d5aeece05276daa03600ca03ff2e89" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de938/de9381f76e4ac0b0cb0a4e437a0118dc4d3c4a84" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f543/8f543622f1a563c9b4afe09e49d3d9b9004253d3" alt="" |
|
|