|
|
|
|
|
|
#197649 - 03/01/04 02:27 PM
Re: Roland exr-3 or exr-5
|
Member
Registered: 09/16/02
Posts: 1704
Loc: Toronto
|
I have not demoed the EXR-3 so my comments are based on the EXR-5 (which I have demoed) and the specs. 1. If you are currently using your computer to create music, then a disk drive on a keyboard would not be necessary. 2. My Roland EM20 has 7 watts per channel and my Yamaha PSR550 is 6 watts per channel, and this is adequate. But, the EXR-3 has 5 watts per channel???? hmmm. You want to hear it for yourself, to see if it is adequate. The voices would be exactly the same. Roland has many good voices. Many Roland voices are superior to the PSR550: trumpet, trombone, vibes, strings, brass, organs, piano, pan flute. Yamaha excels on the sweet voices. The electric pianos and organs are very good on the EXR-5. Starkeeper
_________________________
I play Roland EM20 and Yamaha PSR550
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#197653 - 03/02/04 10:11 AM
Re: Roland exr-3 or exr-5
|
Member
Registered: 12/04/01
Posts: 143
Loc: Madrid, Spain
|
Hi
I can remember EXR-5 has more voices than you say: not only 510 panel voices, but a XG voices bank and a GM2 voices bank too. Is it ok?
About piano voice, Fran Carango and George Kaye said that is from decent to good voice. And I can remember Bart (Burkels) said there is a piano voice better than 001: I may remember it was #003. Is it? We need a piano voice mp3 demo...
About sweet voices. Yes, Yamaha sweet voices are very good. But when I demoed EXR-5, I listened one flute and one sax very similar to "yamaha sweet voices"
Comparing with PSR550, I think EXR-5 looks a lot more serious and pro; PSR550 is a good kb, but it seems more like a toy. But... EXR-5 can't edit or modify styles at all, and PSR-550 can do it. It may be a great difference for some users: you may load all roland styles into EXR-5, but as you can't tune or adjust them to EXR-5, some of them aren't going to sound so well as desired.
[This message has been edited by Artaher (edited 03-02-2004).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#197659 - 03/04/04 12:57 AM
Re: Roland exr-3 or exr-5
|
Junior Member
Registered: 03/01/04
Posts: 8
Loc: Netherlands
|
Marc, If you wan't to see how these 2(and other similar) keyboards compare feature/function wise http://www.netzmarkt.de/thomann/pcompare41.html?sn=d7f1f9d45ef9350586e63b691907e7e5 has a nice overview. Just like you I would also like to see some additional kwalitative feedback from other forum-members on these two models. For me the reasons to choose for the exr-3 are: - positive end-user feedback on sound-quality - decent behaviour as a midi-controller and good compatibility wiht apps like ACID, Cubase and the likes - Key size and feel - 64 voice polyphony (although to be honest I don't know if this is a big plus compared to the 32 VP of the Casio) - USB connectivity - 16-track sequencer - I like the Look and Feel of the Roland (= subjective) On Bart's site http://members.chello.nl/burkels1/exr5/ you can see some reviews and download a nice demo. regards, Louis p.s. does anyone know why it is so difficult to get hold of Roland user-manuals (.pdf) whereas you can just download them from other manufacturers like Yamaha, Casio, etc.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|