|
|
|
|
|
|
#200521 - 11/18/03 11:43 PM
Re: Problems with Tyros
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2195
Loc: Catskill Mountains, NY
|
I have no regrets whatsoever Tom, but I fully understand your concern about the styles. For me, the PA80 and the ES go very well together, and I agree about the solo voices. There are a scant few on the PA80 that I would prefer over the ES, and not all that many over the PSR / Tyros stuff either, with maybe the drums and bass being the big exceptions for my tastes.. I just like some of those better on the PA than on the Yamaha arrangers ( well the 2000 anyway), but not necessarily better than the ones on the ES.
I too find quite a few of the PA80 solo voices to be weak, but ... when used in combos ( layered in performance mode), they can really come to life. Still, it rocks for synth sounds and editing power. On the ES though, so many of the sounds are already great without a lot of tweaking needed.
The PA80, and my MZ2000 before it, had the best organ sounds ( my absolute favorite staple sound ) for my ears. I liked them better than any of the Yamaha boards I had, including the classic Motif. Then the ES came along and changed all of that. It has one of the best C3 emulations I've ever heard with the possible exception of what I hear in the Native Instruments B4 software.
I've thought about upgrading from the PA80 to the PA1x, so I may wait to see whether I think it's worth the upgrade ( when the PA1x speaker version comes out ), but in spite of the marvelous demos I hear from the PA1x, it may not be so much better to me than the PA80 is, that I will find it to be worth all that money. I'll have to find one to demo.
I may very well decide to just add the Tyros to the current lineup ( and keep it all ) instead. Meanwhile, at home, I just use the Yamaha styles via One Man Band and played through the ES. Of course I need to tweak the voices on the ES to match.. Not exactly what I would want to do in a live situation though, and not all that convenient if I just wanna "plug and Play" here in the home studio either.
I think the combination of a PA80 and Tyros is a real winner Tom. It was actually a tough choice for me between the Es and the Tyros, but for me, I just gotta have at least one good workstation. It's looking a lot like the Tyros is the next board that I want. I do miss some of the stuff from the PSR2000. I just don't miss the key feel at all.
AJ
[This message has been edited by Bluezplayer (edited 11-18-2003).]
_________________________
AJ
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#200525 - 11/19/03 10:53 AM
Re: Problems with Tyros
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2195
Loc: Catskill Mountains, NY
|
Tom,
I would love to have had the opportunity to acquire an A-100. A friend who I played guitar with some years back had one with a leslie 147 and you could replicate that B3 or C3 sound with it very nicely.
I have used the PA80 to drive the Motif. There are a few things that have to be done, whether I use OMB or the PA80. Either I tweak the styles themselves ( program / patch / bank #s / effects ) so that I get a decent sounding result, or.. make a user mixing template in the ES and set the bank and patch filter to "on". Either way, it's a of of work to just play a style, although the second way is certainly faster. The advantage of the first method is that if I save the style after the tweaks, it's permanent. It can be permanent on the Es too, but I don't like using up all of my mixer templates on styles.
Way too much work for me to use it this way in a live setup, and really, if I am looking to use a style in the studio, normally it's because I want to practice with a "band". Although it isn't a strict rule for me, I generally don't use a lot of style parts in my own compositions ( of course there are exceptions ).
I guess it all depends on what you want the board for Tom. The ES sounds, especially drums and bass, acoustic / electric guitars ( gotta love that 59 combo patch ) , and organs, hold their own vs anything I've ever heard that wasn't that real thing ( the real thing being the real instrument itself ). I'm not sure that the Tyros matches it in every sound, but it has a ton of good sounds itself, and if the styles are very important to you, the Tyros might be a good way to go. I'm with you on the Roland stuff. The XP80 and XP30 ( the latterI thought was a great value for what it cost ), were the last Roland's that I would have considered. The Fantom has an awesome OS and features, but for my subjective ears, the EP's are dull if not awful in a few cases ( the wurli sound comes immediately to mind ), and the organs.. I just can't see anyone mistaking them for the real thing, even in mix.
AJ
[This message has been edited by Bluezplayer (edited 11-19-2003).]
_________________________
AJ
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|