|
|
|
|
|
|
#201250 - 08/17/03 05:43 AM
Re: Arrangers v. other keyboard types
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/01/99
Posts: 12800
Loc: Penn Yan, NY
|
A better question would be to reverse the situation.
"What can I do on a kn7000 that CAN'T be done on a Motif?"
Many workstations have extensive editing and sampling, but no arranger features. Some feature elaborate arpeggiators that can give you a "psuedo-arranger" in a very rigid, techno kind of way, but to lay down trax...you need to do each part separatly. eg: drums(a pattern, or from scratch) bass (Played live) strings, horns, piano, etc......
get the picture? Also, the pro workstations are usually bulit for road use and have better feeling key beds, and heavier cases. No speakers either.
A kn7000 has a terrific sound engine, but I've never gotten "inside" one to comment on the actual synth section. These comments are generalized to include my experience with hundreds of arrangers over the years. Hope something I said helps !
An arranger is a great way to lay down basic trax in a studio (or bedroom), and you can build on your progect from ther. Many players have trouble writing drum parts, and bass lines.....arrangers take all the worry out of that kind of task.
I have one arranger and at least one hefty module in my studio at all times. That gives me both worlds to use.
_________________________
No longer monitoring this forum. Please visit www.daveboydmusic.com for contact info
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#201255 - 08/17/03 05:16 PM
Re: Arrangers v. other keyboard types
|
Member
Registered: 11/14/02
Posts: 328
Loc: Ontario,Canada
|
The synth in a PSR740 is similar to that in the MU80/100 series but with only 16 parts and fewer voices. If you look in the back of the 740 manual you will see a great deal of sysex. Yhis is not for the faint hearted but you will learn a lot from it. From the console you have access to three insertion DSPs and one for the Vocal Harmony. All you can do is set the dry/wet parameter for each effect and combine the DSPs in only a half dozen ways. There is also a variation DSP which is only accessible when recording styles. However, when you use sysex via a computer connection, you can use all 5 DSPs as insertion or use the Variation DSP as a system DSP in any combination. This is in contradiction to the manual which is not altogether truthful and is missing a great deal of info. You can apply one or all DSPs to a part or apply them separately or in combination to different parts. The parts aren't accessible from the console except for the mod and pitch bend wheels but you get full access via sysex. Each part has reverb, chorus, vibrato etc. independent of the DSPs and you can select any of the voices for each part or layer them on to one channel. There are several ways to get this access, the cheapest being one of the XG editors such as XG Edit, XGGold or XGPad. These editors only give you access to two DSPs and only the XG voices as they were designed for the stand alone synths. The best method is to use XGworks, particularly for the 740 as the XG editor is excellent and will give you access to the whole synth. However, you need my set of updates to get the full capability. I sent them to Nigel but I have yet to find them on the Synth Zone. Maybe Nigel will read this and tell us where he has hidden them. Meanwhile you can find them on Jorgen's website at home7.inet.tele.dk/js/musik/740pages/ . Look under PSR software. I use the 'to host' connection to my 740 as my laptop doesn't have a midi port but does have a serial port. In any case, the 'to host' connection is 20% faster than standard midi. Avoid a USB to midi connection as it has poor latency. Maybe USB 2.0 will be better. Bryan
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#201261 - 08/18/03 09:28 PM
Re: Arrangers v. other keyboard types
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2195
Loc: Catskill Mountains, NY
|
A few examples of some differences and some of the things I can do with my Motif that I cannot do at all or do quickly with my PSR2000 and / or my PA80:
Access raw samples so that I can add a guitar picking or fret noise sound to my acoustic guitar patches to add some realism. In addition, I can assign these sounds by velocity so that they'll only sound in a certain velocity or pitch range. I can use 4 samples per voice then layer 4 voices into a performance. I can access the raw samples on the PA80, but I cannot edit with as much detail, although very good editing for an arranger.. maybe as good as any arranger out there. No capacity for this on the 2k.
I can sample with the Motif.. and to a lesser extent with my PA80 arranger.
With the Motif, assign many various controller parameters to: my mod wheel, my assignable knobs ( that can be controlled in real time ), or to a pedal or breathe controller.
Add a breathe or wind controller to the Motif to give a more real feel and sound to my wind instrument emulations ( works especially well on sax / horn flute sounds )
Add expansion boards with new sounds including physically modeled sounds to the motif.
Motif : Assign arpeggiations of any kind to custom made sounds from my Analog modeling board without using the internal arpeggiator. In other words the arp is built right into the sound with custom note lengths, timings, and scales.. and another arp can be assigned from the kbs main arpeggiator and can be varied back and forth in real time.
Better key feel on the Motif.
In short.. there are many differences for me ( including others that I haven't mentioned ) that make each type of board useful for me depending on what I want to do. I've gone the xg edit route with the 740 and 2k.. and yes..there is some decent editing available.. Still this is not comparable at all to the editing capabilities of a dedicated synth like the Motif, nor is it accessable in real time in the same way ( you are tioed to a computer with xg editing ). The PA80 has much more editing power than any of the Yamaha ararngers I've owned, but still doesn't compare to what I can do on the Motif..
AJ
_________________________
AJ
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|