|
|
|
|
|
|
#201787 - 07/01/02 01:22 PM
Re: Sampling on the 9000 Pro
|
Member
Registered: 02/04/02
Posts: 307
Loc: United States
|
Shakeel, I too did a lot of multisampling on the Yamaha pro when I had it, and these were from Akai CD's (Symphony of voices etc). When converted into Wav format from CDXtract on my PC, I loaded each sample into the Yamaha as AUDIO. I could multi sample each note like on a hardware sampler. Also, if you selected two samples, and used Delay + pan (left for one sample and right for the other), I found myself getting a VERY convincing sound, that I didn't think was possible from a mono sampler. It really sounded good indeed (The "Voices" were better than the internal ones when I finished with them). I didn't have it too long, as I upgraded to a Roland Piano Arranger, but in the short time I had it (couple of months or so), I spent a lot of time on this Yamaha. No, it’s not an Akai S5000, but it can be put to MUCH more use than adding “barking” sounds, and if you map them right, they will have more Bite too J5
_________________________
[i]With the ever increase in technology, the word "impossible" should be used with Caution - if at all..
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#201789 - 07/01/02 02:35 PM
Re: Sampling on the 9000 Pro
|
Member
Registered: 02/04/02
Posts: 307
Loc: United States
|
The Steinway Piano is a £70,000 + instrument used for (amongst other things) Concert Piano playing. Don't even attempt to create a Steinway on the Yamaha Pro Sampler...it won't happen.
However, with the Sounds I used as explained above (Symphony of voices), the results were very good, and more than satisfying. The Quality of the Samples used may have helped a bit even if the end result was a Monaural 16 bit 44.1 KHz sound. The reason Synth type sounds work better in this way, is that you can do more with them after you sample/load them etc (Delay, attack, release effect/flange/phaser, etc), not very useful for the named instrument in question (Steinway piano) on a keyboard/sampler like this. But with Synth sounds (especially soft attack ones like pads etc) the Yamaha produces very acceptable results, as long as you don't expect “Earth-shattering sounds, so to speak.
J5
_________________________
[i]With the ever increase in technology, the word "impossible" should be used with Caution - if at all..
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#201791 - 07/01/02 03:14 PM
Re: Sampling on the 9000 Pro
|
Member
Registered: 02/04/02
Posts: 307
Loc: United States
|
The Sounds I sampled were't synth ones, but real Choir samples created in a Cathedral (AylesburyI think) and when I put them on to the Yamaha pro, they came out sounding better than the onboard vocal sounds (choir) by a margin as well. I haven't got the Yamaha pro anymore, but I dug deep into the sampler, and really went to town with it. Synth sounds aren't the only ones you can make sound good on a Yamaha Pro - I proved that myself by creating vocal sounds from Akai CD's converted to wave...to sound better than the internal samples of the yamaha Pro IMHO.
There was a 1000 + other things I did during my recording, conversion, sampling, Effects routing, "delay timing", panning permutations, etc, that it would take a 10,000 word post to explain it only half of it!
Also, I was very suprised by the low noise level that was evident in this sampling keyboard.
J5
[This message has been edited by Jupitar5 (edited 07-01-2002).]
_________________________
[i]With the ever increase in technology, the word "impossible" should be used with Caution - if at all..
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#201794 - 07/01/02 03:58 PM
Re: Sampling on the 9000 Pro
|
Senior Member
Registered: 01/17/02
Posts: 3319
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|