|
|
|
|
|
|
#209128 - 06/30/01 01:45 PM
Re: 9000 notes......
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2195
Loc: Catskill Mountains, NY
|
Tom Tom,
There is not much I can do to tweak the clarinet or Growl sax on the 740. It doesn't have the same editing abilities as the 9000. In fact other than changing effects and using the mod wheel there is virtually no editing ability on it period. The good thing for me though is that I like most of the sounds enough that I don't need to do a lot of tweaking. The exception is of course if you have a program like XG works or maybe another program ( Cakewalk? ) with xg editing ability. Then you can do quite a bit to edit.. XG works also has a basic VL synth edit function which works rather nicely on saxes/ winds and string instruments. When I composed stuff and made midifiles, I'd often send the midfiles through xg edit to brush up a sound or two and add effects to my arrangement instruments. It works very nicely, but will only retain edits in realtime while you are connected directly to the software. Midifiles which have the edits placed into them will however retain those edits when played from disk with or without the software.
Don M.. Mildly surprised to hear that you miss the guitars on the 9k, but I guess that's why we always talk about apples and oranges ....The acoustics sounded very good to me on the 9k from what I remember of it though, but I haven't heard any arranger with electrics that I like overall better than the PA80. I don't care for the Yamaha electrics, particularly the harder edged ones.. but I think much of it is because I don't like Yamaha's guitar effects at all. I listened to that " Carlos " guitar demo from the 9k pro as well, but I don't care for it at all. I made my own " Carlos " performance preset on the PA80 using the New Strat voice and a custom voice which stared with the OD guitar sample.. Man I swear it sounds like the real thing. Even with all of that I still want to see Korg offer a sampling function so I can add even more guitar sounds.. but I can live nicely with what's on there already. If they did offer it as an expansion piece and they come out with a new OS as promised to allow full event level editing on the sequencer, I would have to rate this board at about the top of the arranger food chain for my needs. Still, I'll probably always use external sequencers for any serious editing so I am not overly concerned about the internal editing capabilities. Even as is I'm very satisfied with it and don't see it being replaced for quite a long time. Some of the sax sounds could be better for me tho.. although I can customize them and get them to sound very decent on the PA80. I didn't like some of the sounds at all on the MZ2000 but my favorite one was the Velo alto sax and the next was the feedback guitar. Neither my PA80 or the 740 has equivalents to those...but the PA80 can really get that Strat thing going on... man I love that sound... I also like many of the styles on the PA80. I always harped on how I like to make my own styles, particularly for composing, when I used the internals of the 740, 9000, MZ, Jammer, and converted styles from Technics, Solton, and Roland, but I like the ones enough on the PA80 that often I can literally get lost just playing to or along with them. I also like that Chord Variation function and see that as a real nice tool as I begin to do some of my own styles.
I'm looking forward to demoing the Karma software as well when it comes out. If it works the way I think it will it will be another great tool on for me to compose with..
Yep Uncle Dave.. sometimes I turn the aftertouch off as well.. especially when doing electric guitar solos... I have too hard a touch with the right hand sometimes and the aftertouch effects are often unwanted. When soloing the pitch and mod joystick ( with the mod effect set up the way I like for a particular instrument ) are all I need..
All in all I like the board enough that my 740 is beginning to collect dust ( or rather its dust cover is .. ) and my M1 is retained strictly as a collectors item. The key action may not suit true pianists at all but works fine for a player like me who was born and bred on organs and later the Korg Poly6. The action is a tad bit stiffer than the 740, which is almost too loose for me when soloing. I can not use heavily weighted or real "piano" feel keys for emulating many other instruments and get them to sound the way I'd like. AJ
[This message has been edited by Bluezplayer (edited 06-30-2001).]
_________________________
AJ
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#209132 - 07/02/01 09:39 AM
Re: 9000 notes......
|
Member
Registered: 01/30/00
Posts: 367
Loc: Indianapolis, IN, USA
|
Life is a circle that goes around round round. I can't keep up with you Dave. X1, PSR9000, VA-7, PA80, 9000PRO, and back to PSR9000. Two years ago you hated the PSR9000 and now it's great. Man, I got lost somewhere . . . no criticism is intended at all. I hope you like your keyboard no matter what you're playing. Besides, I'm sure you make them all sound great.
Steve
_________________________
Some see, some don't, some will, some won't
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#209136 - 07/04/01 08:40 AM
Re: 9000 notes......
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/01/99
Posts: 12800
Loc: Penn Yan, NY
|
They are very different animals, and as you know -I already made the switch from the PA to the PSR. I'll use the same report card for ya: 1)sounds - slight edge to PSR 2)styles - slight edge to PA 3)EZ to use - PSR, by a mile 4)size - PA, by a mile 5)weight - PA, again - BIG time 6)controllers - PSR - MUCH better 7)price - no brainer - PA 8)reliability - even 9)mic effects - both SOUND good, edge to PSR because of the flexibility So, out of 9 categories.....it's PSR - 9 PA - 10 The weight factor, and size gives the PA a slight edge over the PSR if you carry it around a lot. For me - the harmonizer was a larger priority because of the many ways to use it, Unfortunately, I will NOT be singing through it anymore, but I AM excited to use it as a guitar preamp. I am a "unique" user of these arranger keyboards, and my styles are NOT the norm, when it comes down to comparisons. I appreciate the fact that you value my opinions, but remember - they are the opinions of a player that breaks a LOT of rules of convention. My priorities still remain: Vocals, Bass & Drums. The arranger aspects are a great "icing" on the cake, but my needs are quite different from most other arranger players. I really don't consider myself an "arranger" player. I am a bass & chord man, that SOMEtimes uses the arranger to enhance the performance, and compliment my singing. I would never be happy listening to an arranger all night long, no matter which one it was. But that's just me. I have 30+ years in this business, and I'm very set in my ways. Too late to throw it all away now, just because the next wave of products is telling me to do it THEIR way. I want it MY way. Nuff said?
_________________________
No longer monitoring this forum. Please visit www.daveboydmusic.com for contact info
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|