Thanks very much Bill, I may give them a ring to see if I can get a hands on demo somewhere.
So, to Media Station users, is there a control surface that runs under Linux, or is there enough hardware functionality built into Media Station to avoid the touch screen without losing too much. There is a Linux screen reader, but I don't know how developed it is. So, for now, I'd be concentrating on hardware-based solutions for accessibility.
A couple of other points on this thread. Whereas the Stevie Wonders of this world may have armies of techs to do stuff for them, the rest of us don't and, besides, I'd rather be able to do stuff for myself where possible. I think Ray Charles used to do his own editting.
Lastly, I agree with Frank that the use of the word "latency" in this thread is somewhat confusing. As somewhat who bought an Audigy sound card when he shouldn't have, I know what latency as normally described is - delay between triggering a signal and hearing it. I think that "loading time" would be a better description for Spalding's insistence that this keyboard should do what no other computerised system apparently can, IE load massive sample libraries in no time at all. As someone else said, that's not going to happen without gigs of memory.
My accessibility concerns are not mere special pleading. You'll notice how many professional engineers use a control surface in the studio. Many of the touch screen and menu driven interfaces so loudly marketed by manufacturers are actually put in place because they're cheaper to manufacture, not because they're more convenient for you. Obviously, I prefer separate knobs and buttons for every function; but maybe some of you would too. Who remembers the little programmers that Roland used to sell with their synths? I loved those.
------------------
Reg
Skype name regwebb
_________________________
Reg
Skype name regwebb