Originally posted by Dnj:
all it means is they paid more for advertising nothing more.
Originally posted by Scott Langholff:
Actually, having been in music retail for 30 years plus, I'd say Donny is pretty close to the truth.
Hi,
Having worked in or around music retail, wholesale and manufacturing for the past 35 years, I will agree that there have been past editors and management of years gone by where it sure appeared that there was favoritism going on. But under the current crew at Keyboard, I don't think your comments are the least bit valid. Advertising or the lack thereof has absolutely nothing to do with the reviews that appear in their magazine. In fact, Ernie Rideout, editor-in-chief of Keyboard talked about this in his editorial a month or so ago. He explained the decision to replace the term
review with
Audition. And while the writing style, personal experience and musical tastes of each person doing an
Audition varies, which will have some bearing on the outcome, the goal is to be as un-biased as possible.
Case in point, Keyboard included the Genesys Pro S in their Arranger Keyboard article in the April 2007 issue and did a full review of the pRP700 in their March 2007 issue. Generalmusic hasn't advertised in keyboard magazine for years.
Dave
------------------
Wm. David McMahan
Nat'l Product and Support Manager
Generalmusic USA
GEM Community Forums [This message has been edited by WDMcM (edited 08-30-2007).]