|
|
|
|
|
|
#227338 - 02/18/08 02:51 PM
Proud owner of a new Pa2xpro
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/19/02
Posts: 2867
Loc: Tampa, FL
|
After 8 years of Yamaha keyboards, I have finally broke ranks and purchased a new Pa2xpro. Wow, really nice keyboard. I just went to the music store to check out some keyboards and low and behold, they had the Pa2xpro there. After spending some quality time with it, I bought their last one. I'm so confused by the operating system. I actually have to READ the manual! Yikes!!!! This is so much fun though. ------------------ Al Giordano http://www.arrangerworld.comTyros 2, Yamaha P-250, Korg Triton Extreme 76, Roland VK8-M, DW Collectors Series Drums, Roland SPD-S.
_________________________
Al
Pa4x - LD Systems Maui 28 - Mackie Thumps
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227339 - 02/18/08 03:28 PM
Re: Proud owner of a new Pa2xpro
|
Senior Member
Registered: 05/26/99
Posts: 9673
Loc: Levittown, Pa, USA
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227346 - 02/18/08 06:54 PM
Re: Proud owner of a new Pa2xpro
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/00
Posts: 43703
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227350 - 02/19/08 01:07 AM
Re: Proud owner of a new Pa2xpro
|
Senior Member
Registered: 02/23/01
Posts: 3849
Loc: Rome - Italy
|
Al, congratulations on your new purchase: I am sure that you will love it! My experience so far has been that, unlike the Tyros (but like the G-70), the PA2X Pro leaves the end user a lot of freedom to tweak it to his/her liking. Translated in plain words, it's like the folks at Yamaha have thought: "This keyboard is intended for this kind of users, who like these features and don't care for the rest. So let's give 'em what they want." And it's true that they have done all the homework before and the result is that you have a keyboard that out of the box sounds good or very good to 90% of buyers; the negative side, on the other hand, is that once you start dwelving in it, you discover how little choices you have to tweak it in depth and make it "yours". From this point of view the PA2X Pro is a tweaker's heaven; it's true that the folks at Korg apparently haven't done a good preliminary job like the folks at Yamaha, but it's true that in the past they have always updated their OS's on a regular basis (see the PA1X Pro), taking in account most users' requests. The end result is a product that is less subject to obsolescence (because you can import new styles and sample or import new sounds, including those from its concurrents, Tyros 2 or G-70 ) and is much more customizable. Final consideration: one thing that bothers me when I record something with my Tyros 2 is the risk to sound like countless of other Tyros owners, because the overall sound of the keyboard is the same, so you have to play your a§§ off to sound different, and also come up with special ideas about the arrangement, etc. This risk of "sounding the same" is not so pronounced with Roland or Korg, because you can customize and personalize even the way the keyboard sounds before you actually start playing notes. Hope that this makes sense. P.S.: Al, have you tried to load the set called "Real Drums?"
_________________________
Korg Kronos 61 and PA3X-Pro76, Roland G-70, BK7-m and Integra 7, Casio PX-5S, Fender Stratocaster with Fralin pickups, Fender Stratocaster with Kinman pickups, vintage Gibson SG standard.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227354 - 02/19/08 05:43 AM
Re: Proud owner of a new Pa2xpro
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/19/02
Posts: 2867
Loc: Tampa, FL
|
Thanks Dreamer, BTW, I listened to your song samples on Createsongstyles and they are terrific! Very nice. I have not loaded those RealDrums as yet off the CD, but I did notice they were there and quite intrigued by what they offer. I'm still trying to figure out why my microphone goes silent without the Harmony button pressed???? I actually have to power down and back up to restore the Microphone. I'm sure some performance setting is either muting the MIC or lowering the volume to zero (0). The other issue I'm having going from the Yamaha to the Korg is in selecting voice parts. On the T2, it's easy as pressing the voice part button, then just selecting a sound to go with it. with the Korg you have to make sure your on the home page on the screen, press the voice part, then Un-Mute it, then press sound source, then select the sound patch you want. Maybe i'm not doing it correctly, but that seems more difficult than on the Tyros 2. Al Originally posted by Dreamer: Al, congratulations on your new purchase: I am sure that you will love it!
My experience so far has been that, unlike the Tyros (but like the G-70), the PA2X Pro leaves the end user a lot of freedom to tweak it to his/her liking. Translated in plain words, it's like the folks at Yamaha have thought: "This keyboard is intended for this kind of users, who like these features and don't care for the rest. So let's give 'em what they want." And it's true that they have done all the homework before and the result is that you have a keyboard that out of the box sounds good or very good to 90% of buyers; the negative side, on the other hand, is that once you start dwelving in it, you discover how little choices you have to tweak it in depth and make it "yours".
From this point of view the PA2X Pro is a tweaker's heaven; it's true that the folks at Korg apparently haven't done a good preliminary job like the folks at Yamaha, but it's true that in the past they have always updated their OS's on a regular basis (see the PA1X Pro), taking in account most users' requests. The end result is a product that is less subject to obsolescence (because you can import new styles and sample or import new sounds, including those from its concurrents, Tyros 2 or G-70 ) and is much more customizable.
Final consideration: one thing that bothers me when I record something with my Tyros 2 is the risk to sound like countless of other Tyros owners, because the overall sound of the keyboard is the same, so you have to play your a§§ off to sound different, and also come up with special ideas about the arrangement, etc. This risk of "sounding the same" is not so pronounced with Roland or Korg, because you can customize and personalize even the way the keyboard sounds before you actually start playing notes.
Hope that this makes sense.
P.S.: Al, have you tried to load the set called "Real Drums?"
_________________________
Al
Pa4x - LD Systems Maui 28 - Mackie Thumps
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227355 - 02/19/08 05:53 AM
Re: Proud owner of a new Pa2xpro
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/00
Posts: 43703
|
Originally posted by Dreamer: Al, congratulations on your new purchase: I am sure that you will love it!
My experience so far has been that, unlike the Tyros (but like the G-70), the PA2X Pro leaves the end user a lot of freedom to tweak it to his/her liking. Translated in plain words, it's like the folks at Yamaha have thought: "This keyboard is intended for this kind of users, who like these features and don't care for the rest. So let's give 'em what they want." And it's true that they have done all the homework before and the result is that you have a keyboard that out of the box sounds good or very good to 90% of buyers; the negative side, on the other hand, is that once you start dwelving in it, you discover how little choices you have to tweak it in depth and make it "yours".
From this point of view the PA2X Pro is a tweaker's heaven; it's true that the folks at Korg apparently haven't done a good preliminary job like the folks at Yamaha, but it's true that in the past they have always updated their OS's on a regular basis (see the PA1X Pro), taking in account most users' requests. The end result is a product that is less subject to obsolescence (because you can import new styles and sample or import new sounds, including those from its concurrents, Tyros 2 or G-70 ) and is much more customizable.
Final consideration: one thing that bothers me when I record something with my Tyros 2 is the risk to sound like countless of other Tyros owners, because the overall sound of the keyboard is the same, so you have to play your a§§ off to sound different, and also come up with special ideas about the arrangement, etc. This risk of "sounding the same" is not so pronounced with Roland or Korg, because you can customize and personalize even the way the keyboard sounds before you actually start playing notes.
Hope that this makes sense.
P.S.: Al, have you tried to load the set called "Real Drums?" Andrea.....that was a dead on summation for sure....great post that explains it all in a nut shell.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227360 - 02/19/08 10:29 PM
Re: Proud owner of a new Pa2xpro
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/22/02
Posts: 6021
Loc: NSW,Australia
|
Hi Diki, as far as I'm aware it's used for programming guitar tracks from scratch & done in steptime. You get different strum types. These strum types are programmed in the lowest octave. The C gives a full down strum D a full up strum F full down mute body etc etc The next octave up records single strings. Next Octave up triggers the RX noises. The chord types are done via velocity ie a velocity of 1 gives a major chord, velocity 2 maj6th , right up to a velocity of 24 which is a diminished 7th. I had a breif play around with it a while back, it doesn't appear to work the way you think it does. Hopefully someone can clear this up. best wishes Rikki Originally posted by Diki: OK, my bad about Guitar Mode for PA1X. I thought I read somewhere they had updated the OS (or maybe they just announced they were GOING to...).
From what I gather, I was under the impression that Guitar Mode in Style Mode play was possible on the PA800/2X... The main difference from a style that was MADE using Guitar Mode is that, if you use Guitar Mode and Style Mode (at the same time), the Guitar Mode automatically maps your chords to authentic guitar voicings, whereas once it becomes a regular Style track, the regular rules for chord remapping and transposition apply, leading to a loss of the correct fingering and inversion...
Can someone confirm or correct me? I have been giving Roland a hard time for not integrating the two the way I THOUGHT Korg has done... Please don't tell me I've been abusing them erroneously!
_________________________
best wishes Rikki 🧸
Korg PA5X 88 note SX900 Band in a Box 2022
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227364 - 02/20/08 04:01 PM
Re: Proud owner of a new Pa2xpro
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14282
Loc: NW Florida
|
Here's what I THOUGHT was going on. Would someone who DOES kindly correct me... When you have a track that IS in Guitar Mode in a style, you still just play a regular chord in your left hand, correct? Then, all the strum notes, velocities, RX notes etc. are played by the style track (not by you in realtime), and the chord you played is remapped to a chord that is guitar correct.... Is that about it? You mention in one post that there ARE some styles with tracks (maybe only one per style?) that remain in Guitar Mode, while other guitar Parts are in normal... Here's the problem, or at least the difference, as I see it. Once again, please correct me if I'm wrong... The difference between a regular track, even though it has been recorded using a real guitarist with a MIDI guitar, and a Guitar Track, comes about when you play a chord that the guitarist DIDN'T PLAY. You have separate tracks for maj, min, 7th and diminished (that right?) on the Korg. So if you play those chords, you WILL get a correct guitar chord for those choices. BUT... if you play a chord that there is no EXACT recording of it, the NTT (note transposition table) will make the chord play the chord that you played, but NOT voiced the way a guitarist would. On the other hand... in Guitar Mode, it will ALWAYS remap whatever whacked out chord you play to something that a guitarist WOULD play. Big difference, IMO... For those that work with guitarists, or play one themselves, this difference between chord shapes is critical. There is something completely different between how a regular track does a Cm7+5 to an Fm7 than the Guitar Mode plays it. Guitarists don't whizz up and down the neck playing barré chords all night long. They play different shaped chords, depending on where they are. THIS is Guitar Mode's revolutionary change. So, does anyone have a detailed description of how the Korg DOES use Guitar Mode in live play, or did I pretty much get it right? BTW, I was somewhat confused by spalding's post here... " It would not make any sense to use guitar mode in a factory made style as it would (and could never) sound as natural as a real player. Guitar mode is used in an attempt to simulate a real player, not replace one." If simulating a real instrument is NOT trying to replace one, what is? I think the problem comes from relying on manufacturer hype, rather than your own ears. Sure, they used real guitar players to make the style in the first place. But the minute you start playing different chords than THEY laid down, you are no longer listening to a live player. You are listening to a machine interpret the live player's playing! And doing a pretty poor job of it! Guitar Mode is the beginning of the future... Parts that use genuine player techniques and chord re-voicing techniques to interpret your chord choices into genuine performances that a real guitarist WOULD play. On the Roland implementation of this feature, WHERE you play in the Chord Recognition Area determines the inversion of what is strummed. So play a C chord, then an F chord without moving your hand, and the guitar part plays a C chord, then an F chord without moving the chord. In other words, instead of a simple barré jump, it plays the F chord the way a guitarist would. As a different SHAPE, not the same shape higher or lower on the neck (which is what regular tracks do). Can the Korg do this? It's amazing when you hear it (if you already know what a guitarist WOULD play)... Now imagine piano parts that do the same thing (change inversion, rather than block transpose chords), horns that change inversion to keep voice leading correctly, strings, you name it... We're on the brink here folks, and it doesn't involve audio loops. It just takes the horsepower to model these more complex behaviors on to the sounds that use them. Guitar Mode is (hopefully) just the beginning....
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227366 - 02/20/08 06:52 PM
Re: Proud owner of a new Pa2xpro
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/22/02
Posts: 6021
Loc: NSW,Australia
|
Hi Spalding , thank you for the link, that is awesome. Be interesting to see if my Styleworks XT can read these. I went to the extent of loading in the original 1.01 operating system yesterday into my PA800 & saved a couple of styles. Still didn't work in Styleworks, but my Stylfactory software was at least able to read them. Only problem was my user created styles which were done on 1.51 operating system , wouldn't work, s I'm back to 1.51. You've saved me a heap of work, as I was going to have to copy all the styles as 1.01 if I wanted to use them in my Stylefactory software. Much appreciated. best wishes Rikki p.s. looks like I may have to start reading PA1X forum as well as the PA800 forum. haahaa Originally posted by spalding: Definately the PA1X can play PA 800 styles that were done pre version 1.02 and it does so well. There are more effects in the PA800 and so in some cases the wrong effects are in the styles but absolutelty for the majority of styles they work very well on the PA1X
Paolo Tramannoni who is a product manager for Korg Italy said
'With Pa1X, you can load Styles made with Pa800 v. 1.0x. You cannot load Styles made (or edited) with Pa800 v.1.5 or Pa2X (any version). The new Style format includes a Guitar track, that would make no sense in Pa1X. Therefore, these Styles cannot be loaded.
Best regards, Paolo'
And here is a link to all the styles on the Pa800 pre 1.02 version. I have them all on my PA1X hardrive http://www.korgforums.com/forum/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=30370
_________________________
best wishes Rikki 🧸
Korg PA5X 88 note SX900 Band in a Box 2022
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227367 - 02/20/08 08:05 PM
Re: Proud owner of a new Pa2xpro
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/22/02
Posts: 6021
Loc: NSW,Australia
|
Hi Diki, I played around with it last year when I first upgraded to 1.51. I don't think it works the way you think. Apologies Spalding it is recorded in realtime, but not in the same way as one would record a guitar track in my Ketron or PSR. A single note in the lowest octave of the PA800 ( without transposition) ie D will will create a full Up strum, C will create a full down strum etc etc. The next octave up the C note on the keyboard represents the 6th string of a guitar, the D note represents the 5th string, the E note represents the 4th string etc etc (these can be used for playing single strings for arpeggio's) the g# gives you a power chord, the F# mutes all the strings etc etc Next couple of octaves or so give you the rx noises, plucks , fret noises etc Also mentions something about selecting a capo?? It's not for revoicing a chord ieto turn a c3e3g3c4 chord into a voicing that a guitar would normally play.. The style I mentioned literally has bass, drum, percussion, nylon guitar track 1, brazillian guitar track 3, & REAL NYLON GUITAR on track 2 which has been assigned to Guitar Mode Track. It's only used for style parts. The 1.02-1.51 manual explains how it works http://www.korgpa.com/pa_root/en/products/pa800_man.html?en best wishes Rikki [QUOTE]Originally posted by Diki: [B]
_________________________
best wishes Rikki 🧸
Korg PA5X 88 note SX900 Band in a Box 2022
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227368 - 02/20/08 08:29 PM
Re: Proud owner of a new Pa2xpro
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14282
Loc: NW Florida
|
I guess I'm going to have to play one to find out for sure... It sure sounds pretty whacked out to me (unintuitive, if you like ). The way the Roland's work is that you hold down a chord with your left hand (any chord) and you have about two octaves or so to play it higher or lower (inversions and/or octaves). The arranger remaps that chord to a voicing that the guitarist would play, in that section of the neck. Play another chord (of the same type) in the same area, get another accurate guitar voicing, not just a barré jump. Different notes in the RH area do the strumming types (but first six notes with the actual single notes on it, for fingerpicking), up down hard soft, rakes, mutes, down-strokes on note down, up-stroke on release (VERY musical!), etc., but the squeaks are triggered by moving the chord, no need to play them! Taps and knocks round out the range. But here's where they messed up... Because of Roland's OS (no-one knows if it is stubbornness or a patent issue), there is always ONE non-transposing track (the Drum Track). So you can't put the note pattern that your RH would have played to get a particular strum and rhythm pattern into the Style Part, to trigger the Guitar Mode chord...! (Or as you change chords, the Track will transpose, and those strum TYPE notes will get shifted around to something totally different) So it appears on the one hand, the Roland system seems FAR more 'live play' orientated... you actually CAN play some pretty decent sounding guitar strumming and picking in realtime on the keyboard, and it all be guitar accurate, the Korg system, while seeming impossible to play 'live' to create the patterns, once you have done it offline, you CAN use the part as a trigger track for the Guitar mode in Style Play. It seems like we need a mind-meld between the two systems... Roland's ease of performing the strums in the first place, and Korg's ability to take that performance as a Style Track to trigger it automatically. Typical! Two half-assed solutions instead of one integrated one With any luck, these aren't patented systems, and one of the two will finish the job.... Any takers? [This message has been edited by Diki (edited 02-20-2008).]
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227369 - 02/20/08 09:10 PM
Re: Proud owner of a new Pa2xpro
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14282
Loc: NW Florida
|
Bill.... yes, some of that seems to make sense.
The thing is, although it's nice to have these as an option, I envision simply choosing the sound as an automatic map to the appropriate NTT, and also the ability to automatically figure out if a part is a single line (where you want the line preserved) or a chord part (where you want voice leading to make the chord changes more smooth. And preferably, both in the same part!
Some kind of background scan for this ought to be possible. As we all know, having endless possibilities is great for the tweak-heads amongst us, but even better is the machine taking care of all this in the background.
It's kind of like the T2/MotifXS SA controversy... The MotifXS players, despite having access to the SA nuts and bolts of control, actually PREFER the T2 versions of the sounds, where the SA is uneditable, but done right in the first place!
After all, what most of us want to do is simply concentrate on the chord input, and playing a great lead and comp. We don't want to have to worry about HOW the guitar part becomes something that amazes us... we don't want to have to think about how to get the auto Rhodes part to voice-lead smoothly. We just want the machine to do it!
I think the technology is there, now. It only requires the manufacturers to halt working on turning the arranger into a DAW (if we need one of those, most of us already got one!), and get back to concentrating on making a better ARRANGER.
Excuse me for wanting that!
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|