|
|
|
|
|
|
#227658 - 02/23/08 01:26 PM
Re: Is Roland e-80 superior in Styles than Psr-S900?
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/00
Posts: 43703
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227661 - 02/23/08 02:43 PM
Re: Is Roland e-80 superior in Styles than Psr-S900?
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/00
Posts: 43703
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227662 - 02/23/08 03:18 PM
Re: Is Roland e-80 superior in Styles than Psr-S900?
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/08/02
Posts: 15576
Loc: Forest Hill, MD USA
|
Telmo, Forget about the lighter keyfeel--you'll love it when you get old and joints in the hands go to hell. Now, the vocal processor is not great, but none are nearly as good as external or stand alone processors. However, you can make it do some wonderful things if you take the time to tune it to your voice. One of the forum members on the PSR-Tutorial has posted step by step instructions on how to really make those vocals shine using the onboard processor. Spend some time there, use the search engine and check this out. It could save you lots of money. Good Luck, Gary ------------------ Travlin' Easy
_________________________
PSR-S950, TC Helicon Harmony-M, Digitech VR, Samson Q7, Sennheiser E855, Custom Console, and lots of other silly stuff!
K+E=W (Knowledge Plus Experience = Wisdom.)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227664 - 02/23/08 06:55 PM
Re: Is Roland e-80 superior in Styles than Psr-S900?
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/08/02
Posts: 15576
Loc: Forest Hill, MD USA
|
Fran, I gotta' admit the G-70's harmonizer sounds darned good, better than most. I think the stand-alones have the edge, though, but much of this depends upon the voice the singer, and his or her ability to use complex, right-hand chords. Uncle Dave is the master at this, either with onboard of stand alone systems. My right had only has 5 fingers--his has 7 or 8. If you can't carry a tune in a 5-gallon bucket and don't have the magic hands, no harmonizer sounds good. Cheers, Gary ------------------ Travlin' Easy
_________________________
PSR-S950, TC Helicon Harmony-M, Digitech VR, Samson Q7, Sennheiser E855, Custom Console, and lots of other silly stuff!
K+E=W (Knowledge Plus Experience = Wisdom.)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227665 - 02/24/08 01:14 PM
Re: Is Roland e-80 superior in Styles than Psr-S900?
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14297
Loc: NW Florida
|
To try to answer the initial post... Yes, and no... Which styles? Every single arranger has got some styles that are better than other's, and some worse. If you narrow down the range of genres, perhaps we could be more specific. But you ARE comparing a $4000+ arranger with a $1600 one. Build quality, key-bed, weight ( ), sounds and OS differ radically between the two, but styles is a matter of preference, and no two people universally agree on what is 'superior' across the board. My take on this is that, on the whole, Yamaha's styles are quite complete, whereas Roland's are designed to leave room for you to play. Both sound excellent (I would give the edge in drums to the Roland's, but guitars go to the Yamaha's), but their approach differs. Me, I like to play as much as I can, so the Roland styles work best. Others just want to sing on top, or play a lead line, and the more busy Yamaha styles work better. But you have to make your own mind up, or at least narrow down your question for this to be more than a cheering section for the arrangers we already have (you'll rarely get a recommendation for an arranger from someone who uses something else!)...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227666 - 02/24/08 02:04 PM
Re: Is Roland e-80 superior in Styles than Psr-S900?
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/08/02
Posts: 15576
Loc: Forest Hill, MD USA
|
Well, I have no experience with the E80, however, I have played the S900, G-1000, G-800 and lots of others. For MY needs, the S900 would more than fit the bill. I like the fullness of the Yamaha styles, and yes, I am primarily a singer, so that would make sense. I perform a fair number of instrumentals too, mainly when folks just want background music during dinners. Again, I find it tough to beat those wonderful instrument sounds that I enjoy with Yamaha. When I want subtle styles, those with just drums and bass, or sometimes just bass, I usually use the lower variations, which quite frequently are not busy in comparison with the upper variations. And, when necessary, it's real easy to just turn off the segment of the style you want to customize it the way you want for a particular song, or medley. Diki, Have you ever played an E80? Just curious. Gary ------------------ Travlin' Easy [This message has been edited by travlin'easy (edited 02-24-2008).]
_________________________
PSR-S950, TC Helicon Harmony-M, Digitech VR, Samson Q7, Sennheiser E855, Custom Console, and lots of other silly stuff!
K+E=W (Knowledge Plus Experience = Wisdom.)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227668 - 02/26/08 09:31 AM
Re: Is Roland e-80 superior in Styles than Psr-S900?
|
Member
Registered: 02/21/05
Posts: 314
Loc: Allen, TX, USA
|
Originally posted by DonM: Only thing I didn't like about the styles is that there is no effective Break/fill. You can program a break, but it just stops--nothing plays for a beat. DonM Don, I had G70 for a week, and the same reason in your quote made me traded it, while I love everything else. Heck, I traded for PA1XPro, and I,m not happy with the fill in either, still keep it, but back to SD1 for me.
_________________________
Tye
SD9, Audya5, Genos, Roland XP60, 2 Yamaha DSR12, 2 Yamaha Sub, 2 Turbosound 2000
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227678 - 02/26/08 09:10 PM
Re: Is Roland e-80 superior in Styles than Psr-S900?
|
Senior Member
Registered: 05/26/99
Posts: 9673
Loc: Levittown, Pa, USA
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|