|
|
|
|
|
|
#228990 - 03/11/08 07:57 AM
Re: AUDYA
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/00
Posts: 43703
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#228993 - 03/11/08 04:49 PM
Re: AUDYA
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14266
Loc: NW Florida
|
Originally posted by kbrkr: What more could/does the Audya bring to the table over the Korg Pa2xpro?
Maybe an open mind? No, seriously... Those demos sound amazing, but I wonder how much of it is the 'live loop' feature? You won't be able to use those drum breaks more than maybe a couple of times a night before your audience starts to notice that they are identical... Or your songwriting team go 'Not those again!'. And best of luck getting Ketron to release a whole bunch of them. It must cost a fortune to record all these loops with professional players in top notch studios, not to mention the difficulty in getting third-party developers to adopt the proprietary format. So don't imagine the style library will grow much after release (how many new 'live loop' styles have Ketron ADDED to the SD-1 since it's release - or how many third party 'live loop' styles have been made?). Then imagine all your favorite imported Yamaha or Roland or Korg styles sounding very poor in comparison, because the lack of 'live' drums (just like Ketron, now, actually!). And, of course, forget editing them. They are what they are, and that's all they can be. No 'tweaking' a kick pattern to fit a different tune better, or adjusting the guitar part (if it is a loop). I remain skeptical of the method, but I'm keeping an open mind until the final product hits the market. I only hope Ketron increase their distributor chain, because I, for one, am NEVER going to buy one, just to try it out! WAY too much money to chance on a lemon...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#228999 - 03/12/08 12:45 AM
Re: AUDYA
|
Member
Registered: 12/13/05
Posts: 664
Loc: Italy
|
The all Mp3 demos are really amazing, they sounds really good. But for me, all this demos have nothing to do with the arranger engine, they are all programmed under one SEQ. You can just hear that the all parts are played in realtime, Brass, E.Piano...are not patterns, it mean a standard SEQ song. After saw again the Video demos of NAMM: http://youtube.com/watch?v=Xy92wEdaZSo ( sounds there are recorded with a Mic Camera) but still you can hear a totally different sounds sets and arranger switch patterns bugs ( it mean a real OS status) that totally dont match with one of this new Mp3 demos. All the nice video demos are made with a Wav player and never with a true styles, this can make the MS too and much better, try there to transpose +5/-5 semitone or BPM timescratch... Is not a ketron fault but is only the Dream chip limitation, for your know, we have the same chipset on MS and we have ignored this all features because are really poor. Anyway, from today is open the Musikmesse and then for sure someone can compare and make some test if really the Audya arranger sounds same like this Mp3 and when really will be released. For sure soon someone will posting here some true news. Enjoy what you play cheers
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#229003 - 03/15/08 12:36 PM
Re: AUDYA
|
Senior Member
Registered: 02/23/01
Posts: 3849
Loc: Rome - Italy
|
AJ, so I guess it's correct to assume that -considering all the design issues you are still evaluating, like choice of the processor, vocalizer chip, etc- the Audya will not see the light before another six months, at least?
_________________________
Korg Kronos 61 and PA3X-Pro76, Roland G-70, BK7-m and Integra 7, Casio PX-5S, Fender Stratocaster with Fralin pickups, Fender Stratocaster with Kinman pickups, vintage Gibson SG standard.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#229004 - 03/15/08 01:20 PM
Re: AUDYA
|
Member
Registered: 12/13/05
Posts: 664
Loc: Italy
|
well, still in thi last video demo: http://www.ketron.it/musikmesse2008/Video/Sabato_02.wmv at posistion 17:40 you can hear the test of the transpose and timestrech, typical sounds and features of the Dream chip. ( tested here too with my evabord PCI) In the video have trasponed only +1 and -1, because if they transpone more, the Dream chip can not manage it right. The timescrech seem working, but when in the video have reduced to much the BPM, you can hear yourself that the phase and the sounds start to be ugly totally, then Fontanella have stopped asap. Fran have a MS with a old OS, but he can prove the transpose and timescrach quality of Elastique, Dream can never compete and still the P3 intel CPU too IF they will not buy the license like this all company: http://www.zplane.de/index.php?page=references Here a old video demo recoded with the cam mic, but anyway you can heard the good quality of the +7/-5 transpose and the BPM timescretch reduced clode to the zero: http://www.lionstracs.com/demo/video/2007/tiptranspose.wmv Anyway the Audya is one amazing keyboard, they make really a great work, but still remain in the closed and limited embedded system. Recycle then over and over the same audio loops in ROM for create new variation styles is not the right way. Enduse must have the freedom to load the all audio loops that they want and make new generation of styles with a totally different audio loops too. Sorry, but I have a totally different point of view...Open with Freedom... enjoy what you play [This message has been edited by LIONSTRACS (edited 03-15-2008).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|