|
|
|
|
|
|
#238160 - 07/17/08 06:04 AM
Re: new pieces added !!
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/00
Posts: 43703
|
Originally posted by Diki: Beaky, that's not strictly a vibrato, but more of a tremolo, done only on the Irish Bagpipe (or Uilleann Pipes), not the Scottish ones, in general, and is done by fluttering your fingers over open lower holes on the chanter.
But it is definitely a sound that is not employed to every note in a phrase, but picked and chosen carefully, like a good use of the Leslie... (and if some notes require most of your fingers, you have none to spare for the flutter). Absolutely NEVER on just about every note, like the Yamaha demo.
Check out some early music by the Chieftains, for some pretty authentic playing (amongst many others ) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFzkWsMrNfk
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#238168 - 07/17/08 12:20 PM
Re: new pieces added !!
|
Senior Member
Registered: 07/21/05
Posts: 5375
Loc: English Riviera, UK
|
Hi John I see your point, but in the case of Wersi OAS instruments up to OAS 6, (OAS 7 is totally a different format using a combination of sampling and Sound Modelling) if it isn’t in the sample then you can’t edit it. As an example: Let’s say the attack of the Piano is 20ms, then while the editor can increase the attack, it can’t decrease the attack beyond 20ms as this information is not contained in the voice/sample. The same applies to modulation, if it is not contained within the voice/sample, then it cannot be added or modified. Samples themselves come in many forms, some sample the whole instrument and some in sections, e.g. the sound is sampled separately from the modulation and the 2 are combined at a later stage. (Hence the modulation becomes editable separately from the sound) There are many ways to sample, and just because you can’t edit something on one type of sample, doesn’t mean that it can’t be altered on other types of sample. In the end it all comes down to the designer who has to provide what the musician wants.
Regards
Bill
_________________________
English Riviera: Live entertainment, Real Ale, Great Scenery, Great Beaches, why would anyone want to live anywhere else (I�m definitely staying put).
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#238169 - 07/17/08 12:41 PM
Re: new pieces added !!
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14245
Loc: NW Florida
|
The thing is, Bill, if the sample is sampled with vibrato on it, that's it... you can't take it off. Let's not get confused with sounds sampled 'straight', and then an LFO is used to make the vibrato (which you CAN edit). Real instruments' vibratos are FAR more complex than a simple LFO on the pitch. Volume, timbre AND phase are ALL modulated in a 'real' vibrato, much of it under physical control of the player. It is different from player to player (you can often tell who you are listening to solely by the way they use their vibrato), and from song to song (vibrato is often altered depending on tempo). But sampling them has it's Achilles heel... First of all, if you don't sample each and every note separately, they speed up when the sample is transposed (or slow down), you can't control when they come in, and this changes as it is transposed, too, and you can do nothing about the depth and speed. This is all made less important if you have a GIGA sized set of samples, but on the regular ROM of most arrangers, there's just not enough space for all that. Would that you COULD take sampled vibrato off when needed, but it's just not doable. I prefer samples without vibrato, most of the time, and use a pitch strip to induce a real vibrato (one that isn't mechanically regular, like an LFO) for the best sound, if I can. But I LOVE vibrato'd samples as layers for straight ones (or two different vibrato'd samples together). It gives a great thick sound..
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|