SYNTH ZONE
Visit The Bar For Casual Discussion
Page 2 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >
Topic Options
#258314 - 02/26/09 06:41 PM Re: Are Arrangers really headed for the refuse heap?
miden Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 01/31/06
Posts: 3354
Loc: The World
Quote:
Originally posted by Diki:
Oh, and you MIGHT have noticed that the Oasys and the K2600 (the 2600X was an 88 weighted version of the less expensive 2600 76 note version) have both been discontinued.


Just as a matter of interest, I remember reading a quote at the Karma forums, I think it was, that Korg are to release (well were, before this financial hoo-ha) the Oasys MK II later this year.

I don't know how "informed" the poster was, but there you go.

By the way, Diki I totally agree with you that the makers HAVE to target the under 30's market with arrangers if they are to survive.

In my view, I think THAT is indeed what will happen with the next generation. Makers will simply add the arrnager engine to the workstation.

I would not be surprised to see Roland be the first to do this with their G series.

You have got to admit Roland do some dumb things, but when they do something right it's brilliant.

Dennis

PS: Not that I would be interested, as I have bought my last hardware keyboard

Top
#258315 - 02/26/09 07:05 PM Re: Are Arrangers really headed for the refuse heap?
Diki Offline


Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14269
Loc: NW Florida
Seems like Yamaha is FAR ahead of Roland in this regard. The XS needs so little corrected for it's OS to be arranger capable, and then it's simply a case of newer arps (which could probably be imported fro the MIDI output of current arranger's patterns, Intro endings, fills, etc) to make it usable.

But without Music Finders, lyric displays and a revised system for accessing those styles (oops, arps!), they still have a ways to go to equal the shear user friendliness of the arranger.

But Yamaha have made a start... Roland, not so much
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!

Top
#258316 - 02/26/09 07:36 PM Re: Are Arrangers really headed for the refuse heap?
miden Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 01/31/06
Posts: 3354
Loc: The World
Yes, true. Yamaha would certainly get the jump on most, with perhaps the M3 a close second?

LOL, just add the engine to a workstation, get Stevie to rave about it, and then watch the orders come in...Well maybe thats a bit simplistic but you get what I mean.

Roland have gone off the boil I reckon. Starting late last year and so far this year..It's hard to know where they are going really..

Dennnis

Top
#258317 - 02/26/09 07:40 PM Re: Are Arrangers really headed for the refuse heap?
DanO1 Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 01/31/01
Posts: 3602
Loc: Maryland
Quote:
Originally posted by Diki:
Sorry, Dan, but Y K & R's current TOTL offerings are a good grand LESS than the Audya. That's a HUGE spike up in price. Without much in the way of trickle down MOTL products, Ketron have bet the farm that arranger players are willing to fork out $1500 more than a T3 for the Audya.

Kind of reminds me of the demise of organs, to be honest. They went upscale, and priced themselves out of the game...


I guess it is the immediate doom & gloom you predict that gets on my nerves..

In 1988 I sold Yamaha PSR-90's for $899.00 & I purchased a PSR4600 for $1200. The Korg M-1 sold for $1500.00. I sold Lowrey Home Organs for $30,000.00 ... People do all kinds of things... I guess value is perceived in different ways and I have to learn to disregard your comments.
_________________________
dansmusicgear@aol.com
https://www.reverbnation.com/danoneil?profile_view_source=profile_box

Top
#258318 - 02/26/09 09:30 PM Re: Are Arrangers really headed for the refuse heap?
Kingfrog Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 03/24/08
Posts: 1099
Loc: Myrtle beach SC
Quote:
Originally posted by Diki:
Seems like Yamaha is FAR ahead of Roland in this regard. The XS needs so little corrected for it's OS to be arranger capable, and then it's simply a case of newer arps (which could probably be imported fro the MIDI output of current arranger's patterns, Intro endings, fills, etc) to make it usable.

But without Music Finders, lyric displays and a revised system for accessing those styles (oops, arps!), they still have a ways to go to equal the shear user friendliness of the arranger.

But Yamaha have made a start... Roland, not so much


Indeed they did and if the Fantom would have made such a start instead, I would have bought it....I actually may have passed on the T3 altogether if I bothered to deep research the Motif instead of assuming it would be another a hip hop loop manufacturing station or feared the learning curve of the beast. Nothing would thrill me more than having it be able to replace the T3 in its entirety. I would love to bank $2500...But the XS won't replace it but enhance the overall experience.

Perhaops the T4 or Motif ZS with meld the two.....but I doubt Yamaha wants that.
_________________________
Yamaha Tyros 4
Yamaha Motif XS8
Roland RD700
Casio PX-330
Martin DC Aura
Breedlove ATlas Solo
Bose MOD II PA

Top
#258319 - 02/26/09 11:46 PM Re: Are Arrangers really headed for the refuse heap?
miden Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 01/31/06
Posts: 3354
Loc: The World
Quote:
Originally posted by Kingfrog:
Perhaops the T4 or Motif ZS with meld the two.....but I doubt Yamaha wants that.



Maybe they won't have a choice King, and will do it just to stay competitive??? We CAN hope

Dennis

Top
#258320 - 02/27/09 02:27 AM Re: Are Arrangers really headed for the refuse heap?
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote:
Originally posted by DanO1:
I sold Lowrey Home Organs for $30,000.00 ... People do all kinds of things... I guess value is perceived in different ways and I have to learn to disregard your comments.


I will be astonished if Lowrey survived the current financial unpleasantness. Even with Kawai propping them up.

Top
#258321 - 02/27/09 07:06 AM Re: Are Arrangers really headed for the refuse heap?
DanO1 Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 01/31/01
Posts: 3602
Loc: Maryland
Many people probably do not know that Ketron supplied many of the styles for Lowrey...
_________________________
dansmusicgear@aol.com
https://www.reverbnation.com/danoneil?profile_view_source=profile_box

Top
#258322 - 02/27/09 08:21 AM Re: Are Arrangers really headed for the refuse heap?
Dnj Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 09/21/00
Posts: 43703
Just use what you have and practise much more to sound better versus thinking a new keyboard will do that for you.

Top
#258323 - 02/27/09 09:00 AM Re: Are Arrangers really headed for the refuse heap?
cgiles Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 09/29/05
Posts: 6703
Loc: Roswell,GA/USA
As long as technology makes life easier, the products of that technology will survive. As long as human beings are lazy (and proud of it) and instant gratification is the order of the day, painless weight-loss scams and arranger keyboards will be with us. In other words, forever. So forget those boring music lessons. Just keep bugging the manufacturers for more of those features that allow us to play less but enjoy it more. Let's face it, arranger keyboards are the porn of the music business. Think about it, instant gratification, no partner necessary, nothing to learn; a perfect analogy. They'll both be around forever. Stop worrying guys. Everything's cool.

chas
_________________________
"Faith means not wanting to know what is true." [Nietzsche]

Top
Page 2 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Moderator:  Admin, Diki, Kerry 



Help keep Synth Zone Online